You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by André Warnier <aw...@ice-sa.com> on 2009/05/23 18:25:56 UTC
Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [more results]
Christopher Schultz wrote:
Chris, there's something wrong with this post.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [more results]
Posted by Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 5/25/2009 1:30 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Caldarale, Charles R
>> Subject: RE: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [more
>> results]
>
> There are some extracts from the 2007 O'Reilly Tomcat book about
> benchmarking on somewhat newer hardware than Chris is using:
> http://www.devshed.com/c/b/BrainDump/
>
> The interesting articles are dated 02-12-09 through 03-05-09 (silly
> American date format), with actual results in the second page of the
> 02-26-09 article:
> http://www.devshed.com/c/a/BrainDump/Tomcat-Benchmark-Procedure/1/
Interestingly enough, their results suggest that the "Tomcat HTTP JIO"
connector (presumably the basic Coyote connector without APR) performs
the best. The workload (50k requests) relative to the type of machine
used (64-bit, presumably fast CPUs) seems like too little work to get a
good sample.
Note that they use requests-per-second as their metric and not transfer
rate, but those numbers are so closely related as to be synonymous for
comparison purposes.
I will have to start testing prefork httpd (my current configuration)
against worker httpd to see how they compare.
- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkodYCEACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDWpQCfWunji/z1ZbxxX5fAklWm1rsh
/6gAn3P42e4TFPtIIgVyUz1uP8vGTOmZ
=yMwV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
RE: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [more results]
Posted by "Caldarale, Charles R" <Ch...@unisys.com>.
> From: Caldarale, Charles R
> Subject: RE: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [more
> results]
There are some extracts from the 2007 O'Reilly Tomcat book about benchmarking on somewhat newer hardware than Chris is using:
http://www.devshed.com/c/b/BrainDump/
The interesting articles are dated 02-12-09 through 03-05-09 (silly American date format), with actual results in the second page of the 02-26-09 article:
http://www.devshed.com/c/a/BrainDump/Tomcat-Benchmark-Procedure/1/
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
RE: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [more results]
Posted by "Caldarale, Charles R" <Ch...@unisys.com>.
> From: André Warnier [mailto:aw@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [more
> results]
>
> Chris, there's something wrong with this post.
You have to use lemon juice and a heat source to read it...
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org