You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/02/10 09:20:41 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33485] New: -
apr_file_flush on unbuffered files vastly more expensive on Windows
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33485>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33485
Summary: apr_file_flush on unbuffered files vastly more expensive
on Windows
Product: APR
Version: HEAD
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: APR
AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org
ReportedBy: carnold@apache.org
Calling apr_file_flush on an unbuffered file is a no-op in the Unix and OS/2
implementations, however on Windows it is a call to FileFlushBuffers which can
be an incredibly expensive call. I ran into this when the Windows build of
log4cxx was 100-fold slower when writing to file than the Linux build.
I've worked around the problem in log4cxx, however this seems like a landmine to
catch unsuspecting developers.
As it currently stands, apr_file_flush on Win32 leaves the buffered and
unbuffered files in different states. If buffered, it flushes the APR
maintained buffer but doesn't flush the OS buffer by calling FileFlushBuffers.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org