You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ratis.apache.org by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> on 2017/05/02 00:23:42 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] 0.1-alpha release
Hi,
After a short list of sub-tasks under RATIS-53, we are very close to
have our first 0.1.0-alpha release. We may be able to call a vote in
a week or so.
Again, please let me know if you like to include any particular items
to the release.
Thanks for the support!
Nicholas
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the supporting, Let's roll our first release. I
> will start preparing it. I guess we don't have any particular
> features need to be included in it (please let me know if I am wrong).
> However, we still have to make sure the license are fine and the
> release artifact can be built. Will file a JIRA.
>
> Nicholas
>
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 3:27 AM, Jing Zhao <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Jitendra Pandey <ji...@hortonworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 0.1.0-alpha will be better. Three digit versions are better to distinguish
>>> major, minor and maintenance releases.
>>>
>>> On 3/23/17, 2:08 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >How about the versioning? Should we start with 0.1-alpha or
>>> >0.1.0-alpha? The latter seems better.
>>> >
>>> >Tsz-Wo
>>> >
>>> >On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Jitendra Pandey <jn...@gmail.com>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >> +1
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>
>>> >>wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Sounds good. But we have to get the licenses and the rest of release
>>> >>> process in line (tarballs, etc). Should be doable.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Enis
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Anu Engineer
>>> >>><ae...@hortonworks.com>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> > +1, good idea. Early use in SCM will give some real world usage via
>>> >>> CBlock
>>> >>> > and Ozone.
>>> >>> > --Anu
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On 3/22/17, 4:10 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > >Hi,
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > >I propose to release 0.1-alpha so that the downstream projects can
>>> >>> > >start integrating ratis. One example is HDFS-11519.
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > >The release is in alpha quality with no guarantee on stability. We
>>> >>> > >should add such warning in the README. What do you think?
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > >Tsz-Wo
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] 0.1-alpha release
Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.
Just have successfully generated and uploaded all the artifacts for
Apache Ratis 0.1.0-alpha rc0. Will call a vote in a separated thread.
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/0.1.0-alpha/rc0/
Thanks.
Nicholas
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After a short list of sub-tasks under RATIS-53, we are very close to
> have our first 0.1.0-alpha release. We may be able to call a vote in
> a week or so.
>
> Again, please let me know if you like to include any particular items
> to the release.
>
> Thanks for the support!
> Nicholas
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks a lot for the supporting, Let's roll our first release. I
>> will start preparing it. I guess we don't have any particular
>> features need to be included in it (please let me know if I am wrong).
>> However, we still have to make sure the license are fine and the
>> release artifact can be built. Will file a JIRA.
>>
>> Nicholas
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 3:27 AM, Jing Zhao <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Jitendra Pandey <ji...@hortonworks.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 0.1.0-alpha will be better. Three digit versions are better to distinguish
>>>> major, minor and maintenance releases.
>>>>
>>>> On 3/23/17, 2:08 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >How about the versioning? Should we start with 0.1-alpha or
>>>> >0.1.0-alpha? The latter seems better.
>>>> >
>>>> >Tsz-Wo
>>>> >
>>>> >On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Jitendra Pandey <jn...@gmail.com>
>>>> >wrote:
>>>> >> +1
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>
>>>> >>wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Sounds good. But we have to get the licenses and the rest of release
>>>> >>> process in line (tarballs, etc). Should be doable.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Enis
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Anu Engineer
>>>> >>><ae...@hortonworks.com>
>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> > +1, good idea. Early use in SCM will give some real world usage via
>>>> >>> CBlock
>>>> >>> > and Ozone.
>>>> >>> > --Anu
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > On 3/22/17, 4:10 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > >Hi,
>>>> >>> > >
>>>> >>> > >I propose to release 0.1-alpha so that the downstream projects can
>>>> >>> > >start integrating ratis. One example is HDFS-11519.
>>>> >>> > >
>>>> >>> > >The release is in alpha quality with no guarantee on stability. We
>>>> >>> > >should add such warning in the README. What do you think?
>>>> >>> > >
>>>> >>> > >Tsz-Wo
>>>> >>> > >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>