You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Senaka Fernando <se...@gmail.com> on 2008/04/08 11:47:54 UTC

[drlvm][gc] Replacing gc.process with constant

Hi all,

It seems that the string "gc.process" is used in many places within the gc
source. Wouldn't it be better to define this in some common include?

Regards,
Senaka

Re: [drlvm][gc] Replacing gc.process with constant

Posted by Senaka Fernando <se...@gmail.com>.

OK! No issues.

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Xiao-Feng Li <xi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's for verbose info output. "gc.process" is simple enough.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -xiaofeng
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Senaka Fernando <se...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >  It seems that the string "gc.process" is used in many places within the
> gc
> >  source. Wouldn't it be better to define this in some common include?
> >
> >  Regards,
> >  Senaka
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
>

Re: [drlvm][gc] Replacing gc.process with constant

Posted by Xiao-Feng Li <xi...@gmail.com>.

It's for verbose info output. "gc.process" is simple enough.

Thanks,

-xiaofeng

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Senaka Fernando <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>  It seems that the string "gc.process" is used in many places within the gc
>  source. Wouldn't it be better to define this in some common include?
>
>  Regards,
>  Senaka
>



-- 
http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com