You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@mesos.apache.org by "Greg Mann (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/03/08 21:02:38 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (MESOS-7222) Load authenticator modules as singletons

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Greg Mann updated MESOS-7222:
-----------------------------
    Description: 
The Mesos master/agent code currently loads separate instances of an authenticator module for each realm that it's installed into. {{initializeHttpAuthenticators()}} is [called multiple times|https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/a310bcc10b872b44fe6083756030daa96c21d141/src/master/master.cpp#L599-L638], and each invocation [creates an instance|https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/a310bcc10b872b44fe6083756030daa96c21d141/src/common/http.cpp#L987-L988] of the module.

It would be better to create a singleton of each authenticator module. These could be stored in a map, indexed by the module name. Note that libprocess's {{setAuthenticator()}} helper currently accepts an {{Owned<Authenticator>}} and takes ownership of each module instance. In order to pass ownership of authenticator singletons to libprocess, {{setAuthenticator}} could be changed to something like the following:
{code}
Future <Nothing> setAuthenticator(
    const map<string, Owned<Authenticator>> authenticators,
    const map<string, string> authenticatorRealms);
{code}

Note that the current situation would cause a legitimate bug in the case of a stateful authenticator module which is dynamically updated at runtime. This could lead to inconsistent state across the module instances, when the author intended for them to share a single global state.

  was:
The Mesos master/agent code currently loads separate instances of an authenticator module for each realm that it's installed into. {{initializeHttpAuthenticators()}} is [called multiple times|https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/a310bcc10b872b44fe6083756030daa96c21d141/src/master/master.cpp#L599-L638], and each invocation [creates an instance|https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/a310bcc10b872b44fe6083756030daa96c21d141/src/common/http.cpp#L987-L988] of the module.

It would be better to create a singleton of each authenticator module. These could be stored in a map, indexed by the module name. Note that libprocess's {{setAuthenticator()}} helper currently accepts an {{Owned<Authenticator>}} and takes ownership of each module instance. In order to pass ownership of authenticator singletons to libprocess, {{setAuthenticator}} could be changed to something like the following:
{code}
Future <Nothing> setAuthenticator(
    const map<string, Owned<Authenticator>> authenticators,
    const map<string, string> authenticatorRealms);
{code}


> Load authenticator modules as singletons
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-7222
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7222
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: security
>            Reporter: Greg Mann
>              Labels: authentication, libprocess, mesosphere, tech-debt
>
> The Mesos master/agent code currently loads separate instances of an authenticator module for each realm that it's installed into. {{initializeHttpAuthenticators()}} is [called multiple times|https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/a310bcc10b872b44fe6083756030daa96c21d141/src/master/master.cpp#L599-L638], and each invocation [creates an instance|https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/a310bcc10b872b44fe6083756030daa96c21d141/src/common/http.cpp#L987-L988] of the module.
> It would be better to create a singleton of each authenticator module. These could be stored in a map, indexed by the module name. Note that libprocess's {{setAuthenticator()}} helper currently accepts an {{Owned<Authenticator>}} and takes ownership of each module instance. In order to pass ownership of authenticator singletons to libprocess, {{setAuthenticator}} could be changed to something like the following:
> {code}
> Future <Nothing> setAuthenticator(
>     const map<string, Owned<Authenticator>> authenticators,
>     const map<string, string> authenticatorRealms);
> {code}
> Note that the current situation would cause a legitimate bug in the case of a stateful authenticator module which is dynamically updated at runtime. This could lead to inconsistent state across the module instances, when the author intended for them to share a single global state.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)