You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pig.apache.org by Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> on 2008/07/24 01:09:20 UTC
[VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3)
Hi,
Hopefully the final candidate.
http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/
<http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/>
Please, vote by end of day on Monday, 7/28.
Thanks,
Olga
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3)
Posted by Benjamin Reed <br...@yahoo-inc.com>.
+1 Looks good
ben
Alan Gates wrote:
> +1.
>
> It builds, documentation looks good, tutorial looks good.
>
> Alan.
>
> Olga Natkovich wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Hopefully the final candidate.
>> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/
>> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/>
>> Please, vote by end of day on Monday, 7/28.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Olga
>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3)
Posted by Alan Gates <ga...@yahoo-inc.com>.
+1.
It builds, documentation looks good, tutorial looks good.
Alan.
Olga Natkovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hopefully the final candidate.
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/>
>
> Please, vote by end of day on Monday, 7/28.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Olga
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 4)
Posted by Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org>.
+1 This looks good to me!
Doug
Olga Natkovich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have released one more candidate that makes the following changes:
>
> (1) Expands README to include more information about the project
> (2) Removes hadoop16.jar as it is not longer used
> (3) Adds release notes to the candidate directory
> (4) Adds "incubating" to the name of the distribution to comply with the
> incubator policy.
>
> The new artifacts are available at
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/
>
> Please, vote within next 72 hours. We need 3 +1s from committers and
> mentors to move to the PMC vote.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Olga
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 4)
Posted by Alan Gates <ga...@yahoo-inc.com>.
+1.
Alan.
Olga Natkovich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have released one more candidate that makes the following changes:
>
> (1) Expands README to include more information about the project
> (2) Removes hadoop16.jar as it is not longer used
> (3) Adds release notes to the candidate directory
> (4) Adds "incubating" to the name of the distribution to comply with the
> incubator policy.
>
> The new artifacts are available at
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/
>
> Please, vote within next 72 hours. We need 3 +1s from committers and
> mentors to move to the PMC vote.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Olga
>
[VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 4)
Posted by Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Hi,
I have released one more candidate that makes the following changes:
(1) Expands README to include more information about the project
(2) Removes hadoop16.jar as it is not longer used
(3) Adds release notes to the candidate directory
(4) Adds "incubating" to the name of the distribution to comply with the
incubator policy.
The new artifacts are available at
http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-4/
Please, vote within next 72 hours. We need 3 +1s from committers and
mentors to move to the PMC vote.
Thanks,
Olga
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3)
Posted by Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org>.
+1: unit tests pass, keys & hashes match, licensing looks good.
Doug
Olga Natkovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hopefully the final candidate.
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/>
>
> Please, vote by end of day on Monday, 7/28.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Olga
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3)
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> ...The keys are at
> /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/pig/KEYS on people.apache.org....
Ok thanks, with this I give my +1 to this release.
-Bertrand
>
> I will attach rat the report to release JIRA.
>
> Olga
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: bdelacretaz@gmail.com [mailto:bdelacretaz@gmail.com] On
>> Behalf Of Bertrand Delacretaz
>> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 6:06 AM
>> To: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3)
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Olga Natkovich
>> <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>> > ...Hopefully the final candidate.
>> > http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/
>> > <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/>
>> >
>> > Please, vote by end of day on Monday, 7/28....
>>
>> The only thing missing for me to vote is the PGP key
>> (0x06687D96) used to sign the release, could you add it to a
>> KEYS file under
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/pig/trunk/ ? See
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sling/trunk/KEYS
>> for an example. Uploading that key to public key servers like
>> pgp.mit.edu as well would be good.
>>
>> Apart from that the release looks ok, here's what I checked:
>>
>> md5 (2b0a1196a146cff1bc8e3c806ff36858) of pig-0.1.0.tar.gz
>> matches md5 file.
>>
>> LICENSE, NOTICE, README are present and look good to me.
>>
>> The jar files and their licenses, under lib/, look good to me.
>>
>> Apache rat does not report any "important" files without an
>> AL license header. I would suggest attaching the rat report
>> to a JIRA issue in case Incubator people ask about it. And
>> there's a number of test *.pig files that do not have the AL
>> header, if the pig language allows comments (I hope it does
>> ;-) it might be good to add that for future releases.
>>
>> I didn't do any technical tests, not even tried to build Pig
>> from that release, that doesn't matter from my "mentor but
>> not user" point of view.
>>
>> -Bertrand
>>
>
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3)
Posted by Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Hi Torsten,
Let me ask the question a different way - are you ok +1 this release or
do you feel that release instructions and hadoop cleanup needs to happen
first.
Re-rolling packages is not a problem but getting everybody's attention
proved to be fairly time consuming.
Thanks,
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Torsten Curdt [mailto:tcurdt@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 12:22 AM
> To: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3)
>
>
> On Jul 29, 2008, at 00:23, Olga Natkovich wrote:
>
> >> Well, the idea of incubation is to gather a community (besides the
> >> legal aspect). I would suggest to at least provide more detailed
> >> instruction how to get the things working in the wiki. Or
> did I miss
> >> those?
> >
> > I was going to put instructions into the release notes once the
> > release is ready.
>
> IMO this should be part of the release process so the
> instructions can be tested as well.
>
> >>>> Why are both hadoop 0.16 and 0.17 included?
> >>>
> >>> The idea was that people can build with 1 version back.
> >>
> >> That sounds like a good idea ..at least in theory :)
> >>
> >>> However, at this
> >>> point it is not possible since hadoop interfaces change
> >> between each
> >>> version. We can remove hadoop16 I think. Do we need to do
> >> this cleanup
> >>> prior to the release?
> >>
> >> It's a bit awkward to have 0.16 in there if you cannot use
> it at all.
> >
> > Ok. It just if we have to reroll the packages and start
> process over
> > one more time. I was wondering if this was worth starting over.
>
> That's really up to you guys. If you have the release
> procedure properly automated I'd say: do it.
>
> >> (That said I was about to send a question to the dev list
> about using
> >> 0.16 with pig. I need to get it working with 0.16. Will that be a
> >> major hurdle? But let's discuss that in another thread)
> >
> > It is possible, but you would have to take pre hadoop-17
> snapshot of
> > the code. It is quite stable but you would be missing out
> on the work
> > that has been done since.
>
>
> Bugger I was hoping to see a tag for it. Which revision would that be?
>
> cheers
> --
> Torsten
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3)
Posted by Torsten Curdt <tc...@apache.org>.
On Jul 29, 2008, at 00:23, Olga Natkovich wrote:
>> Well, the idea of incubation is to gather a community
>> (besides the legal aspect). I would suggest to at least
>> provide more detailed instruction how to get the things
>> working in the wiki. Or did I miss those?
>
> I was going to put instructions into the release notes once the
> release
> is ready.
IMO this should be part of the release process so the instructions can
be tested as well.
>>>> Why are both hadoop 0.16 and 0.17 included?
>>>
>>> The idea was that people can build with 1 version back.
>>
>> That sounds like a good idea ..at least in theory :)
>>
>>> However, at this
>>> point it is not possible since hadoop interfaces change
>> between each
>>> version. We can remove hadoop16 I think. Do we need to do
>> this cleanup
>>> prior to the release?
>>
>> It's a bit awkward to have 0.16 in there if you cannot use it at all.
>
> Ok. It just if we have to reroll the packages and start process over
> one
> more time. I was wondering if this was worth starting over.
That's really up to you guys. If you have the release procedure
properly automated I'd say: do it.
>> (That said I was about to send a question to the dev list about using
>> 0.16 with pig. I need to get it working with 0.16. Will that
>> be a major hurdle? But let's discuss that in another thread)
>
> It is possible, but you would have to take pre hadoop-17 snapshot of
> the
> code. It is quite stable but you would be missing out on the work that
> has been done since.
Bugger I was hoping to see a tag for it. Which revision would that be?
cheers
--
Torsten
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3)
Posted by Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com>.
> Well, the idea of incubation is to gather a community
> (besides the legal aspect). I would suggest to at least
> provide more detailed instruction how to get the things
> working in the wiki. Or did I miss those?
I was going to put instructions into the release notes once the release
is ready.
>
> >> Why are both hadoop 0.16 and 0.17 included?
> >
> > The idea was that people can build with 1 version back.
>
> That sounds like a good idea ..at least in theory :)
>
> > However, at this
> > point it is not possible since hadoop interfaces change
> between each
> > version. We can remove hadoop16 I think. Do we need to do
> this cleanup
> > prior to the release?
>
> It's a bit awkward to have 0.16 in there if you cannot use it at all.
Ok. It just if we have to reroll the packages and start process over one
more time. I was wondering if this was worth starting over.
> (That said I was about to send a question to the dev list about using
> 0.16 with pig. I need to get it working with 0.16. Will that
> be a major hurdle? But let's discuss that in another thread)
It is possible, but you would have to take pre hadoop-17 snapshot of the
code. It is quite stable but you would be missing out on the work that
has been done since.
Olga
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3)
Posted by Torsten Curdt <tc...@apache.org>.
> Tanks for your feedback. My comments are inline.
>
>> The README is *really* *really* minimalistic.
>
> Do you think we need to update it prior to the release?
Well, the idea of incubation is to gather a community (besides the
legal aspect). I would suggest to at least provide more detailed
instruction how to get the things working in the wiki. Or did I miss
those?
>> Why are both hadoop 0.16 and 0.17 included?
>
> The idea was that people can build with 1 version back.
That sounds like a good idea ..at least in theory :)
> However, at this
> point it is not possible since hadoop interfaces change between each
> version. We can remove hadoop16 I think. Do we need to do this cleanup
> prior to the release?
It's a bit awkward to have 0.16 in there if you cannot use it at all.
(That said I was about to send a question to the dev list about using
0.16 with pig. I need to get it working with 0.16. Will that be a
major hurdle? But let's discuss that in another thread)
Congrats to the RC. That's already a major step.
cheers
--
Torsten
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3)
Posted by Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Hi Torsten,
Thanks for your feedback. My comments are inline.
> The README is *really* *really* minimalistic.
Do you think we need to update it prior to the release?
>
> Why are both hadoop 0.16 and 0.17 included?
The idea was that people can build with 1 version back. However, at this
point it is not possible since hadoop interfaces change between each
version. We can remove hadoop16 I think. Do we need to do this cleanup
prior to the release?
Olga
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3)
Posted by Torsten Curdt <tc...@apache.org>.
The README is *really* *really* minimalistic.
Why are both hadoop 0.16 and 0.17 included?
cheers
--
Torsten
RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3)
Posted by Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Hi Bertrand,
Thanks for the review. The keys are at
/www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/pig/KEYS on people.apache.org.
I will attach rat the report to release JIRA.
Olga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bdelacretaz@gmail.com [mailto:bdelacretaz@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Bertrand Delacretaz
> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 6:06 AM
> To: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3)
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Olga Natkovich
> <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> > ...Hopefully the final candidate.
> > http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/
> > <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/>
> >
> > Please, vote by end of day on Monday, 7/28....
>
> The only thing missing for me to vote is the PGP key
> (0x06687D96) used to sign the release, could you add it to a
> KEYS file under
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/pig/trunk/ ? See
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sling/trunk/KEYS
> for an example. Uploading that key to public key servers like
> pgp.mit.edu as well would be good.
>
> Apart from that the release looks ok, here's what I checked:
>
> md5 (2b0a1196a146cff1bc8e3c806ff36858) of pig-0.1.0.tar.gz
> matches md5 file.
>
> LICENSE, NOTICE, README are present and look good to me.
>
> The jar files and their licenses, under lib/, look good to me.
>
> Apache rat does not report any "important" files without an
> AL license header. I would suggest attaching the rat report
> to a JIRA issue in case Incubator people ask about it. And
> there's a number of test *.pig files that do not have the AL
> header, if the pig language allows comments (I hope it does
> ;-) it might be good to add that for future releases.
>
> I didn't do any technical tests, not even tried to build Pig
> from that release, that doesn't matter from my "mentor but
> not user" point of view.
>
> -Bertrand
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 3)
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> ...Hopefully the final candidate.
> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/
> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.1.0-candidate-3/>
>
> Please, vote by end of day on Monday, 7/28....
The only thing missing for me to vote is the PGP key (0x06687D96) used
to sign the release, could you add it to a KEYS file under
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/pig/trunk/ ? See
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sling/trunk/KEYS for an
example. Uploading that key to public key servers like pgp.mit.edu as
well would be good.
Apart from that the release looks ok, here's what I checked:
md5 (2b0a1196a146cff1bc8e3c806ff36858) of pig-0.1.0.tar.gz matches md5 file.
LICENSE, NOTICE, README are present and look good to me.
The jar files and their licenses, under lib/, look good to me.
Apache rat does not report any "important" files without an AL license
header. I would suggest attaching the rat report to a JIRA issue in
case Incubator people ask about it. And there's a number of test *.pig
files that do not have the AL header, if the pig language allows
comments (I hope it does ;-) it might be good to add that for future
releases.
I didn't do any technical tests, not even tried to build Pig from that
release, that doesn't matter from my "mentor but not user" point of
view.
-Bertrand