You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@db.apache.org by Bryan Pendleton <bp...@gmail.com> on 2016/09/24 16:11:33 UTC

db/site versus db/site-cms

Hi all,

I suspect I'm not the only person who's been confused by

     https://svn.apache.org/repos/db/site

versus

     https://svn.apache.org/repos/db/site-cms

Is there any reason I can't, or shouldn't, do a 'svn delete' on
the entire db/site tree, leaving only the db/site-cms tree?

thanks,

bryan

Re: Fwd: db/site versus db/site-cms

Posted by Bryan Pendleton <bp...@gmail.com>.
> website source BEFORE we migrated to the svnpubsub system [...vs...] AFTER that transition?

> I don't recall needing to access any of the BEFORE versions.

Thanks Rick, that was exactly the question.

I'll maybe ask one more time on private@db, and then I'll do
the 'svn delete', because I think it will be clearer to explicitly
delete the no-longer-used files.

thanks,

bryan

Re: Fwd: db/site versus db/site-cms

Posted by Rick Hillegas <ri...@gmail.com>.
On 10/29/16, 5:10 PM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
> > Hm, I'm getting "page not found" errors on those links.
>
> Oops! Let's try again:
>
>>> From: Bryan Pendleton <bp...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I suspect I'm not the only person who's been confused by
>>>
>>>     https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/db/site
>>>
>>> versus
>>>
>>>     https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/db/site-cms
>>>
>>> Is there any reason I can't, or shouldn't, do a 'svn delete' on
>>> the entire db/site tree, leaving only the db/site-cms tree?
>
> Do those links work better?
>
> thanks,
>
> bryan
>
>
Does the former link point to the website source BEFORE we migrated to 
the svnpubsub system and the latter link point to the website source 
AFTER that transition? If that's the case, then I can't imagine any use 
for the old material. We migrated four years ago. In those four years, I 
don't recall needing to access any of the BEFORE versions.

Have I garbled this?

Thanks,
-Rick

Re: Fwd: db/site versus db/site-cms

Posted by Bryan Pendleton <bp...@gmail.com>.
 > Hm, I'm getting "page not found" errors on those links.

Oops! Let's try again:

>> From: Bryan Pendleton <bp...@gmail.com>
>>
>> I suspect I'm not the only person who's been confused by
>>
>>     https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/db/site
>>
>> versus
>>
>>     https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/db/site-cms
>>
>> Is there any reason I can't, or shouldn't, do a 'svn delete' on
>> the entire db/site tree, leaving only the db/site-cms tree?

Do those links work better?

thanks,

bryan

Re: Fwd: db/site versus db/site-cms

Posted by Rick Hillegas <ri...@gmail.com>.
On 10/29/16, 4:32 PM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
> I'm not sure anyone saw this on general@db, so trying again on 
> derby-dev...
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: db/site versus db/site-cms
> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:11:33 -0700
> From: Bryan Pendleton <bp...@gmail.com>
> To: general@db.apache.org
>
> Hi all,
>
> I suspect I'm not the only person who's been confused by
>
>     https://svn.apache.org/repos/db/site
>
> versus
>
>     https://svn.apache.org/repos/db/site-cms
>
> Is there any reason I can't, or shouldn't, do a 'svn delete' on
> the entire db/site tree, leaving only the db/site-cms tree?
>
> thanks,
>
> bryan
>
Hm, I'm getting "page not found" errors on those links.

Fwd: db/site versus db/site-cms

Posted by Bryan Pendleton <bp...@gmail.com>.
I'm not sure anyone saw this on general@db, so trying again on derby-dev...


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: db/site versus db/site-cms
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:11:33 -0700
From: Bryan Pendleton <bp...@gmail.com>
To: general@db.apache.org

Hi all,

I suspect I'm not the only person who's been confused by

     https://svn.apache.org/repos/db/site

versus

     https://svn.apache.org/repos/db/site-cms

Is there any reason I can't, or shouldn't, do a 'svn delete' on
the entire db/site tree, leaving only the db/site-cms tree?

thanks,

bryan