You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by "Clara Xiong (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/09/24 19:10:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (HBASE-26297) Balancer run is improperly triggered
by accuracy error of double comparison
Clara Xiong created HBASE-26297:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Balancer run is improperly triggered by accuracy error of double comparison
Key: HBASE-26297
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26297
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Balancer
Environment: {code:java}
{code}
Reporter: Clara Xiong
{code:java}
protected synchronized boolean areSomeRegionReplicasColocated(Cluster c) {
regionReplicaHostCostFunction.init(c);
if (regionReplicaHostCostFunction.cost() > 0) {
return true;
}
regionReplicaRackCostFunction.init(c);
if (regionReplicaRackCostFunction.cost() > 0) {
return true;
}
{code}
The values are in double data type. we often run into unnecessary runs.
{code:java}
2021-09-24 12:02:41,943 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer: Running balancer because at least one server hosts replicas of the same region.
2021-09-24 12:01:42,878 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer: Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 2400001 ms to try 3048341 different iterations. Found a solution that moves 81 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 1.7429830473781883E-4 to a new imbalance of 1.6169961756947032E-4.
{code}
As in another PR, we should use a delta minimum value instead of 0 for double comparison.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)