You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by Ed Staub <es...@comcast.net> on 2010/08/10 00:28:29 UTC

{VOTE???} Release Maven 3.0-beta-3

In the discussion over the weekend, it seemed like a high value was placed
on having a beta-3 that differed from beta-2 only (or almost only) in the
Aether and Guice changes.

 

Given that, should a second vote get started for beta-3 ASAP, so that
there's as little other change between them as possible?

 

(It may be the plan to base beta-3 off the beta-2 tag, rather than trunk.
If so, ignore this suggestion!)

 

-Ed Staub (not a committer)

 


Re: Release Maven 3.0-beta-2

Posted by Manfred Moser <ma...@mosabuam.com>.
Hi all!

Thanks for the great release. I thought I let you know that the new beta-2
release works like a charm for Android projects using the Maven Android
Plugin.

On to trying the new site plugin next ..

manfred
http://www.simpligility.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org


Re: {VOTE???} Release Maven 3.0-beta-3

Posted by Arnaud Héritier <ah...@gmail.com>.
There were a long long discussion about that on this mailing list and we decided to push a beta-2 without and can now integrate them.
A beta 3 wil be published with these changes ASAP

On Aug 10, 2010, at 11:34 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote:

> Don't we need to have guice/aether merged in -before- we can talk about the
> release?
> 
> Or has the great merge already happened?
> 
> -- 
> Pull me down under...
> 
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Ed Staub <es...@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> In the discussion over the weekend, it seemed like a high value was placed
>> on having a beta-3 that differed from beta-2 only (or almost only) in the
>> Aether and Guice changes.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Given that, should a second vote get started for beta-3 ASAP, so that
>> there's as little other change between them as possible?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> (It may be the plan to base beta-3 off the beta-2 tag, rather than trunk.
>> If so, ignore this suggestion!)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -Ed Staub (not a committer)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org


Re: {VOTE???} Release Maven 3.0-beta-3

Posted by Mark Derricutt <ma...@talios.com>.
Don't we need to have guice/aether merged in -before- we can talk about the
release?

Or has the great merge already happened?

-- 
Pull me down under...

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Ed Staub <es...@comcast.net> wrote:

> In the discussion over the weekend, it seemed like a high value was placed
> on having a beta-3 that differed from beta-2 only (or almost only) in the
> Aether and Guice changes.
>
>
>
> Given that, should a second vote get started for beta-3 ASAP, so that
> there's as little other change between them as possible?
>
>
>
> (It may be the plan to base beta-3 off the beta-2 tag, rather than trunk.
> If so, ignore this suggestion!)
>
>
>
> -Ed Staub (not a committer)
>
>
>
>