You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2006/02/09 07:54:59 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36306] - Collection of fixes to address Checkstyle complaints
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36306>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36306
------- Additional Comments From fzammetti@omnytex.com 2006-02-09 07:54 -------
I know there has been some recent headway in all this, which is great! I also
know that Wendy has offered to deal with some of the remaining issues, which
seem to almost entirely be simple commenting fixups (or additions of missing
comments). I have offered to help her in that task this weekend. Initially
I'm thinking of tackling the action package. Does that present any conflict
for what you planned Wendy?
One question... do we need to define any style rules for comments? For
instance, I tend to want to line things up, i.e. the parameter, return and
exception comments on a method I like to have lined up in terms of their
starting column... somestimes this leads to some short lines though because of
making sure to keep the line lengths below 80. Other people prefer not
bothering with that and let it simply flow naturally. Do we have a preference
here? More to the point, will Jalopy enforce any particular style? If it
does I suppose this is a moot point, it would work either way.
Similarly, what about the order of tokens? @parameter, @return, @exception
vs. @exception, @parameter, @return for example. What about spaces between
the description of the method and the start of the tokens?
Am I perhaps being too anal about it? :) Maybe none of this is important.
Like I said, if Jalopy can deal with all of this, then no worries I suppose.
Just want to make sure what I do is quickly and easily acceptable is all, and
consistent with the effort Wendy and/or others put in.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org