You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Pavel Tupitsyn (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/08/01 17:36:20 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1915) .NET: Ignite as Entity Framework Second-Level Cache

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15402473#comment-15402473 ] 

Pavel Tupitsyn commented on IGNITE-1915:
----------------------------------------

1) We use GetOrCreateCache deliberately. If there is a user-defined cache with specified name, it will be picked up. User has full control over the cache configuration.
2) Having multiple databases is very unlikely, and user should understand the consequences of using the same cache for them. Single DB is the most frequent use case, and we want to reduce configuration efforts for it.
3) Changed to long
4) TODO
5) Fixed

> .NET: Ignite as Entity Framework Second-Level Cache
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-1915
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1915
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: platforms
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.4
>            Reporter: Pavel Tupitsyn
>            Assignee: Pavel Tupitsyn
>              Labels: .net, roadmap
>             Fix For: 1.7
>
>
> Entity Framework is #1 ORM for .NET
> We should provide easy solution to boost Entity Framework performance with Ignite.
> EF5 and EF6 have different 2nd level cache mechanisms (EF5 has a built-in one, EF6 requies more customization or a 3rd party lib like https://efcache.codeplex.com/). For now, let's do EF6 only.
> This should be in a separate assembly and a separate NuGet package.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)