You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Daniel Fagerstrom <da...@nada.kth.se> on 2004/12/01 13:49:01 UTC
Re: svn commit: r109328 - in cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: . src/blocks/template
src/blocks/template/conf src/blocks/template/java src/blocks/template/java/org
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/jexl
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/script
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag/samples
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/util src/blocks/template/samples
src/blocks/template/test src/blocks/template/test/org src/blocks/template/test/org/apache
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/je! xl src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/util
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/util
lgawron@apache.org wrote:
>Author: lgawron
>Date: Wed Dec 1 03:51:37 2004
>New Revision: 109328
>
>URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=109328
>Log:
>initial (very initial) cocoon-template-block
>Added:
> cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/template/
> cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/template/conf/
> cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/template/java/
> cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/template/java/org/
> cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/
> cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/
> cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/
>
>
Thanks for commiting the template stuff !
But do you really think that it is worth the effort to keep 2.1.x
syncronized with trunk wrt template at this early stage of development?
I'd prefer to sync it when we are a little bit more shure about what
interfaces we should have and so on.
/Daniel
Template block ( was Re: svn commit: r109328)
Posted by Ugo Cei <ug...@apache.org>.
Il giorno 01/dic/04, alle 17:04, Upayavira ha scritto:
> Or remove it. Because if you leave something that isn't going to be
> maintained there, it will give users the wrong impression.
+1 on removing it from 2.1 for exactly this reason.
Ugo
P.S. folks, can you please a) avoid quoting the whole fscking thread
just to add a few words at the end? And b) edit the subject so that
it's more meaningful and shorter than the one created by SVN? Thanks
;-)
--
Ugo Cei - http://beblogging.com/
Re: svn commit: r109328 - in cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: . src/blocks/template
src/blocks/template/conf src/blocks/template/java src/blocks/template/java/org
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/jexl
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/script
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag/samples
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/util src/blocks/template/samples
src/blocks/template/test src/blocks/template/test/org src/blocks/template/test/org/apache
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/je! xl src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/util
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/util
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@upaya.co.uk>.
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>
>> Upayavira wrote:
>>
>>> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>>>
>>>> Upayavira wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for commiting the template stuff !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But do you really think that it is worth the effort to keep
>>>>>>>> 2.1.x syncronized with trunk wrt template at this early stage
>>>>>>>> of development? I'd prefer to sync it when we are a little bit
>>>>>>>> more shure about what interfaces we should have and so on.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fine by me. Still we can sync once a few revisions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We can do that, but then we have to change the code so that it is
>>>>>> Java 1.3 compatible (or just turn of compilation of the block in
>>>>>> 2.1.x by default). The code contains some java.nio stuff which
>>>>>> IIRC not is contained in 1.3.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Really, this should be developed in trunk, and then back-ported
>>>>> when it reaches a level of stability (unless we get 2.2 out quick
>>>>> enough :-) )
>>>>>
>>>>> Trunk is where new stuff goes, IMO.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I see, sorry for the mess.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No probs. That's what the rest of us are here for!
>>>
>>>> Should I disable the block build by default ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Erm. In trunk, I would leave it enabled. After all, it is just
>>> another unstable block.
>>
>>
>> I mean 2.1.x
>>
> Disable it in 2.1.x.
Or remove it. Because if you leave something that isn't going to be
maintained there, it will give users the wrong impression.
It can always be re-added when the trunk version has reached a level of
maturity.
Regards, Upayavira
Re: svn commit: r109328 - in cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: . src/blocks/template
src/blocks/template/conf src/blocks/template/java src/blocks/template/java/org
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/jexl
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/script
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag/samples
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/util src/blocks/template/samples
src/blocks/template/test src/blocks/template/test/org src/blocks/template/test/org/apache
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/je! xl src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/util
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/util
Posted by Daniel Fagerstrom <da...@nada.kth.se>.
Leszek Gawron wrote:
> Upayavira wrote:
>
>> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>>
>>> Upayavira wrote:
>>>
>>>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip/>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for commiting the template stuff !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But do you really think that it is worth the effort to keep
>>>>>>> 2.1.x syncronized with trunk wrt template at this early stage of
>>>>>>> development? I'd prefer to sync it when we are a little bit more
>>>>>>> shure about what interfaces we should have and so on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fine by me. Still we can sync once a few revisions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We can do that, but then we have to change the code so that it is
>>>>> Java 1.3 compatible (or just turn of compilation of the block in
>>>>> 2.1.x by default). The code contains some java.nio stuff which
>>>>> IIRC not is contained in 1.3.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Really, this should be developed in trunk, and then back-ported
>>>> when it reaches a level of stability (unless we get 2.2 out quick
>>>> enough :-) )
>>>>
>>>> Trunk is where new stuff goes, IMO.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I see, sorry for the mess.
>>
>>
>>
>> No probs. That's what the rest of us are here for!
>>
>>> Should I disable the block build by default ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Erm. In trunk, I would leave it enabled. After all, it is just
>> another unstable block.
>
> I mean 2.1.x
>
Disable it in 2.1.x.
/Daniel
Re: svn commit: r109328 - in cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: . src/blocks/template
src/blocks/template/conf src/blocks/template/java src/blocks/template/java/org
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/jexl
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/script
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag/samples
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/util src/blocks/template/samples
src/blocks/template/test src/blocks/template/test/org src/blocks/template/test/org/apache
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/je! xl src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/util
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/util
Posted by Leszek Gawron <lg...@mobilebox.pl>.
Upayavira wrote:
> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>
>> Upayavira wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <snip/>
>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for commiting the template stuff !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But do you really think that it is worth the effort to keep 2.1.x
>>>>>> syncronized with trunk wrt template at this early stage of
>>>>>> development? I'd prefer to sync it when we are a little bit more
>>>>>> shure about what interfaces we should have and so on.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fine by me. Still we can sync once a few revisions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We can do that, but then we have to change the code so that it is
>>>> Java 1.3 compatible (or just turn of compilation of the block in
>>>> 2.1.x by default). The code contains some java.nio stuff which IIRC
>>>> not is contained in 1.3.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Really, this should be developed in trunk, and then back-ported when
>>> it reaches a level of stability (unless we get 2.2 out quick enough
>>> :-) )
>>>
>>> Trunk is where new stuff goes, IMO.
>>
>>
>> I see, sorry for the mess.
>
>
> No probs. That's what the rest of us are here for!
>
>> Should I disable the block build by default ?
>
>
> Erm. In trunk, I would leave it enabled. After all, it is just another
> unstable block.
I mean 2.1.x
--
Leszek Gawron lgawron@mobilebox.pl
Project Manager MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67 http://www.mobilebox.pl
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812 fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65
Re: svn commit: r109328 - in cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: . src/blocks/template
src/blocks/template/conf src/blocks/template/java src/blocks/template/java/org
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/jexl
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/script
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag/samples
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/util src/blocks/template/samples
src/blocks/template/test src/blocks/template/test/org src/blocks/template/test/org/apache
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/je! xl src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/util
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/util
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@upaya.co.uk>.
Leszek Gawron wrote:
> Upayavira wrote:
>
>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>>>
>>>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <snip/>
>>>
>>>>> Thanks for commiting the template stuff !
>>>>>
>>>>> But do you really think that it is worth the effort to keep 2.1.x
>>>>> syncronized with trunk wrt template at this early stage of
>>>>> development? I'd prefer to sync it when we are a little bit more
>>>>> shure about what interfaces we should have and so on.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fine by me. Still we can sync once a few revisions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We can do that, but then we have to change the code so that it is
>>> Java 1.3 compatible (or just turn of compilation of the block in
>>> 2.1.x by default). The code contains some java.nio stuff which IIRC
>>> not is contained in 1.3.
>>
>>
>>
>> Really, this should be developed in trunk, and then back-ported when
>> it reaches a level of stability (unless we get 2.2 out quick enough
>> :-) )
>>
>> Trunk is where new stuff goes, IMO.
>
> I see, sorry for the mess.
No probs. That's what the rest of us are here for!
> Should I disable the block build by default ?
Erm. In trunk, I would leave it enabled. After all, it is just another
unstable block.
Regards, Upayavira
Re: svn commit: r109328 - in cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: . src/blocks/template
src/blocks/template/conf src/blocks/template/java src/blocks/template/java/org
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/jexl
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/script
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag/samples
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/util src/blocks/template/samples
src/blocks/template/test src/blocks/template/test/org src/blocks/template/test/org/apache
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/je! xl src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/util
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/util
Posted by Leszek Gawron <lg...@mobilebox.pl>.
Upayavira wrote:
> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>
>> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> <snip/>
>>
>>>> Thanks for commiting the template stuff !
>>>>
>>>> But do you really think that it is worth the effort to keep 2.1.x
>>>> syncronized with trunk wrt template at this early stage of
>>>> development? I'd prefer to sync it when we are a little bit more
>>>> shure about what interfaces we should have and so on.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Fine by me. Still we can sync once a few revisions.
>>
>>
>>
>> We can do that, but then we have to change the code so that it is Java
>> 1.3 compatible (or just turn of compilation of the block in 2.1.x by
>> default). The code contains some java.nio stuff which IIRC not is
>> contained in 1.3.
>
>
> Really, this should be developed in trunk, and then back-ported when it
> reaches a level of stability (unless we get 2.2 out quick enough :-) )
>
> Trunk is where new stuff goes, IMO.
I see, sorry for the mess. Should I disable the block build by default ?
--
Leszek Gawron lgawron@mobilebox.pl
Project Manager MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67 http://www.mobilebox.pl
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812 fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65
Re: svn commit: r109328 - in cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: . src/blocks/template
src/blocks/template/conf src/blocks/template/java src/blocks/template/java/org
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/jexl
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/script
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag/samples
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/util src/blocks/template/samples
src/blocks/template/test src/blocks/template/test/org src/blocks/template/test/org/apache
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/je! xl src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/util
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/util
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@upaya.co.uk>.
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>
>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>
>
> <snip/>
>
>>> Thanks for commiting the template stuff !
>>>
>>> But do you really think that it is worth the effort to keep 2.1.x
>>> syncronized with trunk wrt template at this early stage of
>>> development? I'd prefer to sync it when we are a little bit more
>>> shure about what interfaces we should have and so on.
>>
>>
>> Fine by me. Still we can sync once a few revisions.
>
>
> We can do that, but then we have to change the code so that it is Java
> 1.3 compatible (or just turn of compilation of the block in 2.1.x by
> default). The code contains some java.nio stuff which IIRC not is
> contained in 1.3.
Really, this should be developed in trunk, and then back-ported when it
reaches a level of stability (unless we get 2.2 out quick enough :-) )
Trunk is where new stuff goes, IMO.
Regards, Upayavira
Re: svn commit: r109328 - in cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: . src/blocks/template
src/blocks/template/conf src/blocks/template/java src/blocks/template/java/org
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/jexl
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/script
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag/samples
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/util src/blocks/template/samples
src/blocks/template/test src/blocks/template/test/org src/blocks/template/test/org/apache
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/je! xl src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/util
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/util
Posted by Daniel Fagerstrom <da...@nada.kth.se>.
Leszek Gawron wrote:
> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
<snip/>
>> Thanks for commiting the template stuff !
>>
>> But do you really think that it is worth the effort to keep 2.1.x
>> syncronized with trunk wrt template at this early stage of
>> development? I'd prefer to sync it when we are a little bit more
>> shure about what interfaces we should have and so on.
>
> Fine by me. Still we can sync once a few revisions.
We can do that, but then we have to change the code so that it is Java
1.3 compatible (or just turn of compilation of the block in 2.1.x by
default). The code contains some java.nio stuff which IIRC not is
contained in 1.3.
/Daniel
Re: svn commit: r109328 - in cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: . src/blocks/template
src/blocks/template/conf src/blocks/template/java src/blocks/template/java/org
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/jexl
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/script
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag/samples
src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/util src/blocks/template/samples
src/blocks/template/test src/blocks/template/test/org src/blocks/template/test/org/apache
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/je! xl src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/util
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation
src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/util
Posted by Leszek Gawron <lg...@mobilebox.pl>.
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> lgawron@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: lgawron
>> Date: Wed Dec 1 03:51:37 2004
>> New Revision: 109328
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=109328
>> Log:
>> initial (very initial) cocoon-template-block
>> Added:
>> cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/template/
>> cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/template/conf/
>> cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/template/java/
>> cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/template/java/org/
>> cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/
>>
>> cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/
>>
>> cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/
>>
>>
>
> Thanks for commiting the template stuff !
>
> But do you really think that it is worth the effort to keep 2.1.x
> syncronized with trunk wrt template at this early stage of development?
> I'd prefer to sync it when we are a little bit more shure about what
> interfaces we should have and so on.
Fine by me. Still we can sync once a few revisions.
--
Leszek Gawron lgawron@mobilebox.pl
Project Manager MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67 http://www.mobilebox.pl
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812 fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65