You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@forrest.apache.org by Diwaker Gupta <di...@apache.org> on 2005/11/24 08:59:36 UTC
upgrade fop?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=113270183731548&w=2
Do we want to upgrade yet?
Diwaker
--
Web/Blog/Gallery: http://floatingsun.net
On Apache: http://people.apache.org/~diwaker
Re: upgrade fop?
Posted by Cyriaque Dupoirieux <Cy...@pcotech.fr>.
Ross Gardler a écrit :
> David Crossley wrote:
>
>> Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>>> Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote:
>>>
>>>> Diwaker Gupta a ?crit :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=113270183731548&w=2
>>>>>
>>>>> Do we want to upgrade yet?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They wrote in FOP site :
>>>>
>>>> * This release is a (unstable) preview release and not intended
>>>> for use in a production environment. Use at your own risk!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we can wait until the FOP 0.90 ?
>>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>
>>>
>>> +1 for waiting
>>
>>
>>
>> However we don't need to wait all the way until the
>> official final release. At Forrest we have a policy
>> that we can use pre-release versions.
>>
>> We need to make sure that it works in Cocoon 2.2 first
>> then try it here. The Cocoon FOP Block might need to be
>> upgraded (yes, just tried and it does). It would be good
>> to give the FOP people some feedback along the way.
>
>
> You make a good point, Ignore my preference for waiting.
Yes indeed, I also don't know what to think now.
I didn't wanted to add problems in order we focus on the existing ones,
but in fact, maybe I was wrong...
Cyriaque,
>
> Ross
>
>
Re: upgrade fop?
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@apache.org>.
David Crossley wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
>
>>Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote:
>>
>>>Diwaker Gupta a ?crit :
>>>
>>>
>>>>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=113270183731548&w=2
>>>>
>>>>Do we want to upgrade yet?
>>>>
>>>
>>>They wrote in FOP site :
>>>
>>> * This release is a (unstable) preview release and not intended
>>> for use in a production environment. Use at your own risk!
>>>
>>>
>>>Maybe we can wait until the FOP 0.90 ?
>>>
>>>WDYT ?
>>
>>+1 for waiting
>
>
> However we don't need to wait all the way until the
> official final release. At Forrest we have a policy
> that we can use pre-release versions.
>
> We need to make sure that it works in Cocoon 2.2 first
> then try it here. The Cocoon FOP Block might need to be
> upgraded (yes, just tried and it does). It would be good
> to give the FOP people some feedback along the way.
You make a good point, Ignore my preference for waiting.
Ross
Re: upgrade fop?
Posted by David Crossley <cr...@apache.org>.
Ross Gardler wrote:
> Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote:
> >Diwaker Gupta a ?crit :
> >
> >>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=113270183731548&w=2
> >>
> >>Do we want to upgrade yet?
> >>
> >They wrote in FOP site :
> >
> > * This release is a (unstable) preview release and not intended
> > for use in a production environment. Use at your own risk!
> >
> >
> >Maybe we can wait until the FOP 0.90 ?
> >
> >WDYT ?
>
> +1 for waiting
However we don't need to wait all the way until the
official final release. At Forrest we have a policy
that we can use pre-release versions.
We need to make sure that it works in Cocoon 2.2 first
then try it here. The Cocoon FOP Block might need to be
upgraded (yes, just tried and it does). It would be good
to give the FOP people some feedback along the way.
-David
Re: upgrade fop?
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@apache.org>.
Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote:
> Diwaker Gupta a écrit :
>
>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=113270183731548&w=2
>>
>> Do we want to upgrade yet?
>>
> They wrote in FOP site :
>
> * This release is a (unstable) preview release and not intended
> for use in a production environment. Use at your own risk!
>
>
> Maybe we can wait until the FOP 0.90 ?
>
> WDYT ?
+1 for waiting
Ross
Re: upgrade fop?
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org>.
El jue, 24-11-2005 a las 10:29 +0100, Cyriaque Dupoirieux escribió:
> Diwaker Gupta a écrit :
>
> >http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=113270183731548&w=2
> >
> >Do we want to upgrade yet?
> >
> >
> They wrote in FOP site :
>
> * This release is a (unstable) preview release and not intended
> for use in a production environment. Use at your own risk!
>
>
> Maybe we can wait until the FOP 0.90 ?
>
> WDYT ?
+1
--
thorsten
"Together we stand, divided we fall!"
Hey you (Pink Floyd)
Re: upgrade fop?
Posted by Cyriaque Dupoirieux <Cy...@pcotech.fr>.
Diwaker Gupta a écrit :
>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=113270183731548&w=2
>
>Do we want to upgrade yet?
>
>
They wrote in FOP site :
* This release is a (unstable) preview release and not intended
for use in a production environment. Use at your own risk!
Maybe we can wait until the FOP 0.90 ?
WDYT ?
Salutations,
Cyriaque,
>Diwaker
>
>