You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> on 2016/08/05 12:35:28 UTC

geronimo component alone?

Hi,

At I wrote I wonder if we should let the geronimo component alone with only 2 classes, could we not put that in entity or entityext?

Opinions?

Jacques

Re: geronimo component alone?

Posted by Taher Alkhateeb <sl...@gmail.com>.

Yup +1 makes sense.

To that end I also think all *ext components do not make much sense and
should be merged with their base counterparts.

On Aug 5, 2016 2:43 PM, "Jacopo Cappellato" <
jacopo.cappellato@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:

> I think that making it part of the entity component would make sense.
>
> Jacopo
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
> jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > At I wrote I wonder if we should let the geronimo component alone with
> > only 2 classes, could we not put that in entity or entityext?
> >
> > Opinions?
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> >
>

Re: geronimo component alone?

Posted by Jacopo Cappellato <ja...@hotwaxsystems.com>.

I think that making it part of the entity component would make sense.

Jacopo

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> At I wrote I wonder if we should let the geronimo component alone with
> only 2 classes, could we not put that in entity or entityext?
>
> Opinions?
>
> Jacques
>
>