You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Bruno Busco <br...@gmail.com> on 2008/06/19 19:27:15 UTC
Login Management
Hi,
I am evaluating the use of OFBiz for a non-ERP application.
So I am going to use the framework alone and then build the custom
applications.
My applications, anyway, needs users Logins and relative groups, permissions
and roles.
>From what I can see the UserLogin entity is defined by the framework itself,
so I imagine it will work without the Party component.
But I also see that the
https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/partymgr/control/editlogin is implemented in
the Party component.
Shouldn't it be the framework.itself to implement such basic Login entity
management screen?
Thank you,
Bruno
Re: Login Management
Posted by Adrian Crum <ad...@hlmksw.com>.
I agree that there needs to be a basic user login maintenance UI in the
framework. I'm about to post another message having to do with user
logins and permissions - maybe we can have a coordinated effort on that.
-Adrian
Bruno Busco wrote:
> Hi,
> I am evaluating the use of OFBiz for a non-ERP application.
> So I am going to use the framework alone and then build the custom
> applications.
>
> My applications, anyway, needs users Logins and relative groups, permissions
> and roles.
>
>>>From what I can see the UserLogin entity is defined by the framework itself,
> so I imagine it will work without the Party component.
> But I also see that the
> https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/partymgr/control/editlogin is implemented in
> the Party component.
> Shouldn't it be the framework.itself to implement such basic Login entity
> management screen?
>
> Thank you,
> Bruno
>
Re: Login Management
Posted by Adrian Crum <ad...@yahoo.com>.
That's a great idea - thanks!
--- On Sat, 6/21/08, David E Jones <jo...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote:
> From: David E Jones <jo...@hotwaxmedia.com>
> Subject: Re: Login Management
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, June 21, 2008, 5:21 PM
> I agree, but I'm not sure that webtools is the place.
> The common
> component is a much better place.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Jun 21, 2008, at 11:47 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>
> > It would be nice to have all of the security related
> UI in the
> > Webtools component, then have the Party component
> share those
> > artifacts. So, the Party Security UI wouldn't
> change, but its
> > security-related screens and forms and such would be
> kept in Webtools.
> >
> > -Adrian
> >
> >
> > --- On Thu, 6/19/08, Bruno Busco
> <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Bruno Busco <br...@gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Login Management
> >> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> >> Date: Thursday, June 19, 2008, 10:27 AM
> >> Hi,
> >> I am evaluating the use of OFBiz for a non-ERP
> application.
> >> So I am going to use the framework alone and then
> build the
> >> custom
> >> applications.
> >>
> >> My applications, anyway, needs users Logins and
> relative
> >> groups, permissions
> >> and roles.
> >>
> >> From what I can see the UserLogin entity is
> defined by the
> >> framework itself,
> >> so I imagine it will work without the Party
> component.
> >> But I also see that the
> >>
> https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/partymgr/control/editlogin is
> >> implemented in
> >> the Party component.
> >> Shouldn't it be the framework.itself to
> implement such
> >> basic Login entity
> >> management screen?
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Bruno
> >
> >
> >
Re: Login Management
Posted by David E Jones <jo...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
I agree, but I'm not sure that webtools is the place. The common
component is a much better place.
-David
On Jun 21, 2008, at 11:47 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> It would be nice to have all of the security related UI in the
> Webtools component, then have the Party component share those
> artifacts. So, the Party Security UI wouldn't change, but its
> security-related screens and forms and such would be kept in Webtools.
>
> -Adrian
>
>
> --- On Thu, 6/19/08, Bruno Busco <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Bruno Busco <br...@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Login Management
>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
>> Date: Thursday, June 19, 2008, 10:27 AM
>> Hi,
>> I am evaluating the use of OFBiz for a non-ERP application.
>> So I am going to use the framework alone and then build the
>> custom
>> applications.
>>
>> My applications, anyway, needs users Logins and relative
>> groups, permissions
>> and roles.
>>
>> From what I can see the UserLogin entity is defined by the
>> framework itself,
>> so I imagine it will work without the Party component.
>> But I also see that the
>> https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/partymgr/control/editlogin is
>> implemented in
>> the Party component.
>> Shouldn't it be the framework.itself to implement such
>> basic Login entity
>> management screen?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Bruno
>
>
>
Re: Login Management
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Yes, it seems to go well with the framework split
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum" <ad...@yahoo.com>
> It would be nice to have all of the security related UI in the Webtools component, then have the Party component share those
> artifacts. So, the Party Security UI wouldn't change, but its security-related screens and forms and such would be kept in
> Webtools.
>
> -Adrian
>
>
> --- On Thu, 6/19/08, Bruno Busco <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Bruno Busco <br...@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Login Management
>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
>> Date: Thursday, June 19, 2008, 10:27 AM
>> Hi,
>> I am evaluating the use of OFBiz for a non-ERP application.
>> So I am going to use the framework alone and then build the
>> custom
>> applications.
>>
>> My applications, anyway, needs users Logins and relative
>> groups, permissions
>> and roles.
>>
>> From what I can see the UserLogin entity is defined by the
>> framework itself,
>> so I imagine it will work without the Party component.
>> But I also see that the
>> https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/partymgr/control/editlogin is
>> implemented in
>> the Party component.
>> Shouldn't it be the framework.itself to implement such
>> basic Login entity
>> management screen?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Bruno
>
>
>
>
Re: Login Management
Posted by Adrian Crum <ad...@yahoo.com>.
It would be nice to have all of the security related UI in the Webtools component, then have the Party component share those artifacts. So, the Party Security UI wouldn't change, but its security-related screens and forms and such would be kept in Webtools.
-Adrian
--- On Thu, 6/19/08, Bruno Busco <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Bruno Busco <br...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Login Management
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Thursday, June 19, 2008, 10:27 AM
> Hi,
> I am evaluating the use of OFBiz for a non-ERP application.
> So I am going to use the framework alone and then build the
> custom
> applications.
>
> My applications, anyway, needs users Logins and relative
> groups, permissions
> and roles.
>
> From what I can see the UserLogin entity is defined by the
> framework itself,
> so I imagine it will work without the Party component.
> But I also see that the
> https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/partymgr/control/editlogin is
> implemented in
> the Party component.
> Shouldn't it be the framework.itself to implement such
> basic Login entity
> management screen?
>
> Thank you,
> Bruno