You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@activemq.apache.org by "Hiram Chirino (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/06/23 14:50:42 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (APLO-216) performance graphs are confusing/incorrect in the Stomp benchmark report ???

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APLO-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Hiram Chirino closed APLO-216.
------------------------------

    Resolution: Not A Problem
      Assignee: Hiram Chirino

Hi Robert,

The right place to open issues against the stomp-benchmark is at:
https://github.com/chirino/stomp-benchmark/issues

The graphs show total produced messages or total consumed message for a given time interval.  That's the simplest way to aggregate the metrics collected during the benchmark sampling interval.
                
> performance graphs are confusing/incorrect in the Stomp benchmark report ???
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: APLO-216
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APLO-216
>             Project: ActiveMQ Apollo
>          Issue Type: Question
>          Components: apollo-stomp
>            Reporter: robert engels
>            Assignee: Hiram Chirino
>            Priority: Minor
>
> In many of the performance graphs, for example, the non-persistent 5x5 topics, the consumer msgs/sec is more than the producer msgs/sec. It seems you are multiplying the consumed message x the number of consumers, rather than counting how many of X sent messages to the topic were received by ALL consumers.
> Is there some more detail description of these charts?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira