You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> on 2019/06/08 04:49:18 UTC
Re: wicket-jquery-ui-9 release
Hello Sebastien,
Could you please release 9.0.0-M2?
I'm planning to perform release of Apache OpenMeetings in 2-3 weeks,
so I need to eliminate all SNAPSHOT dependencies :)
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 19:56, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks a million for the changes!
>
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 16:02, Sebastien Briquet <sb...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > @Martin: thank you very much for your commits!
> > > > Except for the java 11 javadoc-url related commit, I think it is safe to
> > > > cherry-pick other commits to wicket8.x, right?
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes. I think so too.
> > >
> > > (I'm actually wondering
> > > > about the wicket:header-items one)
> > > >
> > >
> > > This one as well.
> > >
> >
> > Done, all applied.
> > wicket8.x and wicket9.x snapshots deployed.
> >
> >
> > > You can check by starting the samples in wicket8.x branch and checking the
> > > browser's dev tools console.
> > >
> >
> > I will check this...
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > About Unit Tests, yes you are right there is no tests! :) The idea was -
> > > > because spare time is limited of course - to test all features by a demo.
> > > > This way users have a demo for each feature which is useful and if there
> > > is
> > > > an issue, they can report through a github issue. I think it is more
> > > > efficient than spending a large amount of time trying to test everything
> > > in
> > > > a UI framework where the layout is also very important, and very
> > > difficult
> > > > to test...
> > > >
> > >
> > > Amazing job! :-)
> > > This way you had time to provide all these demos!
> > >
> > >
> > Thank you !! :))
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > I fixed the "javadoc is missing" issue I had on my side (somehow my JDK
> > > did
> > > > not contain the javadoc program. I apt install it again, as well as
> > > > openjdk-11-jdk-headless package just to be sure, and it works)
> > > >
> > > > I also enabled TravisCI job for wicket9.x so snapshots will (should) be
> > > > deployed on successful builds from now.
> > > > https://travis-ci.org/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/branches
> > > >
> > > > @Maxim: I merged the MR in wicket8.x and applied the change in wicket9.x.
> > > > But it seems that Travis does not deploy wicket8.x branch... :(
> > >
> >
> > Somehow Travis is deploying wicket8.x again, not sure I fixed something....
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: wicket-jquery-ui-9 release
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Thanks a million!
On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 at 19:19, Sebastien <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Maxim,
>
> wicket-jquery-ui-9.0.0-M2 is on its way to maven central :)
>
> Best regards,
> Sebastien
>
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 8:03 AM Sebastien <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Maxim,
>>
>> It is almost ready :)
>> I need to double check everything is fine and perform the release.
>>
>> I will let you know once done...
>>
>> Thanks and best regards,
>> Sebastien
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 8, 2019, 13:49 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Sebastien,
>>>
>>> Could you please release 9.0.0-M2?
>>> I'm planning to perform release of Apache OpenMeetings in 2-3 weeks,
>>> so I need to eliminate all SNAPSHOT dependencies :)
>>>
>>> On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 19:56, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Thanks a million for the changes!
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 16:02, Sebastien Briquet <sb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > @Martin: thank you very much for your commits!
>>> > > > > Except for the java 11 javadoc-url related commit, I think it is safe to
>>> > > > > cherry-pick other commits to wicket8.x, right?
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Yes. I think so too.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > (I'm actually wondering
>>> > > > > about the wicket:header-items one)
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > This one as well.
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Done, all applied.
>>> > > wicket8.x and wicket9.x snapshots deployed.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > You can check by starting the samples in wicket8.x branch and checking the
>>> > > > browser's dev tools console.
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > I will check this...
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > About Unit Tests, yes you are right there is no tests! :) The idea was -
>>> > > > > because spare time is limited of course - to test all features by a demo.
>>> > > > > This way users have a demo for each feature which is useful and if there
>>> > > > is
>>> > > > > an issue, they can report through a github issue. I think it is more
>>> > > > > efficient than spending a large amount of time trying to test everything
>>> > > > in
>>> > > > > a UI framework where the layout is also very important, and very
>>> > > > difficult
>>> > > > > to test...
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Amazing job! :-)
>>> > > > This way you had time to provide all these demos!
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > Thank you !! :))
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > I fixed the "javadoc is missing" issue I had on my side (somehow my JDK
>>> > > > did
>>> > > > > not contain the javadoc program. I apt install it again, as well as
>>> > > > > openjdk-11-jdk-headless package just to be sure, and it works)
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > I also enabled TravisCI job for wicket9.x so snapshots will (should) be
>>> > > > > deployed on successful builds from now.
>>> > > > > https://travis-ci.org/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/branches
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > @Maxim: I merged the MR in wicket8.x and applied the change in wicket9.x.
>>> > > > > But it seems that Travis does not deploy wicket8.x branch... :(
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Somehow Travis is deploying wicket8.x again, not sure I fixed something....
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > WBR
>>> > Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: wicket-jquery-ui-9 release
Posted by Sebastien <se...@gmail.com>.
Hi Maxim,
wicket-jquery-ui-9.0.0-M2 is on its way to maven central :)
Best regards,
Sebastien
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 8:03 AM Sebastien <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> It is almost ready :)
> I need to double check everything is fine and perform the release.
>
> I will let you know once done...
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> Sebastien
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2019, 13:49 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Sebastien,
>>
>> Could you please release 9.0.0-M2?
>> I'm planning to perform release of Apache OpenMeetings in 2-3 weeks,
>> so I need to eliminate all SNAPSHOT dependencies :)
>>
>> On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 19:56, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks a million for the changes!
>> >
>> > On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 16:02, Sebastien Briquet <sb...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > @Martin: thank you very much for your commits!
>> > > > > Except for the java 11 javadoc-url related commit, I think it is
>> safe to
>> > > > > cherry-pick other commits to wicket8.x, right?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Yes. I think so too.
>> > > >
>> > > > (I'm actually wondering
>> > > > > about the wicket:header-items one)
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > This one as well.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Done, all applied.
>> > > wicket8.x and wicket9.x snapshots deployed.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > You can check by starting the samples in wicket8.x branch and
>> checking the
>> > > > browser's dev tools console.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > I will check this...
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > About Unit Tests, yes you are right there is no tests! :) The
>> idea was -
>> > > > > because spare time is limited of course - to test all features by
>> a demo.
>> > > > > This way users have a demo for each feature which is useful and
>> if there
>> > > > is
>> > > > > an issue, they can report through a github issue. I think it is
>> more
>> > > > > efficient than spending a large amount of time trying to test
>> everything
>> > > > in
>> > > > > a UI framework where the layout is also very important, and very
>> > > > difficult
>> > > > > to test...
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Amazing job! :-)
>> > > > This way you had time to provide all these demos!
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > Thank you !! :))
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > I fixed the "javadoc is missing" issue I had on my side (somehow
>> my JDK
>> > > > did
>> > > > > not contain the javadoc program. I apt install it again, as well
>> as
>> > > > > openjdk-11-jdk-headless package just to be sure, and it works)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I also enabled TravisCI job for wicket9.x so snapshots will
>> (should) be
>> > > > > deployed on successful builds from now.
>> > > > > https://travis-ci.org/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/branches
>> > > > >
>> > > > > @Maxim: I merged the MR in wicket8.x and applied the change in
>> wicket9.x.
>> > > > > But it seems that Travis does not deploy wicket8.x branch... :(
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Somehow Travis is deploying wicket8.x again, not sure I fixed
>> something....
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > WBR
>> > Maxim aka solomax
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
Re: wicket-jquery-ui-9 release
Posted by Sebastien <se...@gmail.com>.
Hi Maxim,
It is almost ready :)
I need to double check everything is fine and perform the release.
I will let you know once done...
Thanks and best regards,
Sebastien
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019, 13:49 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Sebastien,
>
> Could you please release 9.0.0-M2?
> I'm planning to perform release of Apache OpenMeetings in 2-3 weeks,
> so I need to eliminate all SNAPSHOT dependencies :)
>
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 19:56, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks a million for the changes!
> >
> > On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 16:02, Sebastien Briquet <sb...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > @Martin: thank you very much for your commits!
> > > > > Except for the java 11 javadoc-url related commit, I think it is
> safe to
> > > > > cherry-pick other commits to wicket8.x, right?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes. I think so too.
> > > >
> > > > (I'm actually wondering
> > > > > about the wicket:header-items one)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > This one as well.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Done, all applied.
> > > wicket8.x and wicket9.x snapshots deployed.
> > >
> > >
> > > > You can check by starting the samples in wicket8.x branch and
> checking the
> > > > browser's dev tools console.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I will check this...
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > About Unit Tests, yes you are right there is no tests! :) The idea
> was -
> > > > > because spare time is limited of course - to test all features by
> a demo.
> > > > > This way users have a demo for each feature which is useful and if
> there
> > > > is
> > > > > an issue, they can report through a github issue. I think it is
> more
> > > > > efficient than spending a large amount of time trying to test
> everything
> > > > in
> > > > > a UI framework where the layout is also very important, and very
> > > > difficult
> > > > > to test...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Amazing job! :-)
> > > > This way you had time to provide all these demos!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Thank you !! :))
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > I fixed the "javadoc is missing" issue I had on my side (somehow
> my JDK
> > > > did
> > > > > not contain the javadoc program. I apt install it again, as well as
> > > > > openjdk-11-jdk-headless package just to be sure, and it works)
> > > > >
> > > > > I also enabled TravisCI job for wicket9.x so snapshots will
> (should) be
> > > > > deployed on successful builds from now.
> > > > > https://travis-ci.org/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/branches
> > > > >
> > > > > @Maxim: I merged the MR in wicket8.x and applied the change in
> wicket9.x.
> > > > > But it seems that Travis does not deploy wicket8.x branch... :(
> > > >
> > >
> > > Somehow Travis is deploying wicket8.x again, not sure I fixed
> something....
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>