You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Sunil G (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/08/13 19:10:13 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-2390) Investigating whehther generic history service needs to support application-acls

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14095725#comment-14095725 ] 

Sunil G commented on YARN-2390:
-------------------------------

For getting application report, container report etc, currently in ClientRMService Queue ACL for ADMINISTER_QUEUE is also checked.

I think for these reports, same will be applicable in HistoryService also. 

> Investigating whehther generic history service needs to support application-acls
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2390
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2390
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>
> According YARN-1250,  it's arguable whether queue-acls should be applied to the generic history service as well, because the queue admin may not need the access to the completed application that is removed from the queue. Create this ticket to tackle the discussion around.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)