You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@hbase.apache.org by Duo Zhang <zh...@apache.org> on 2024/06/09 14:08:47 UTC
[DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for HBase 3.x
HBase 3.0.0-beta-2 is about to come, it will be the last beta release
and then we will release our first 3.x GA HBase.
There is a discussion thread about dropping jdk8 support in HBase
3.x[1], we all agree to do this but there is no consensus on which jdk
version should be the minimum supported version yet, although there
were some suggestions on jumping to jdk17 directly.
So here we open a new discussion thread to disucssion which version to
choose, jdk 11 or jdk 17?
Suggestions are welcome.
Thanks.
1. https://lists.apache.org/thread/y0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5
Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for HBase 3.x
Posted by "张铎(Duo Zhang)" <pa...@gmail.com>.
Email sent.
And filed HBASE-28674 for tracking the related works.
张铎(Duo Zhang) <pa...@gmail.com> 于2024年6月18日周二 21:59写道：
>
> OK, so most of us suggested to jump directly to jdk17.
>
> Let me send a NOTICE email to both user and dev list to announce this
> and start the follow on tasks.
>
> Thanks all for helping here!
>
> Pankaj Kumar <pa...@gmail.com> 于2024年6月17日周一 12:23写道：
> >
> > +1 on JDK17 (minimum version) for 3.x.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pankaj
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Jun, 2024, 7:53 am Ankit Singhal, <an...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for JDK 17 as the minimum supported version for 3.x.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 at 16:55, rajeshbabu@apache.org <
> > > chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for JDK17 for 3.x.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Rajeshbabu.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, 6:40 PM Dieter De Paepe
> > > <dieterdp@ngdata.com.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Our production environment is also on java21 already.
> > > > > +1 for Jdk 17.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Dieter
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > From: Bryan Beaudreault <bb...@apache.org>
> > > > > Sent: 13 June 2024 13:30
> > > > > To: dev@hbase.apache.org <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for
> > > > > HBase 3.x
> > > > >
> > > > > Same timeline for us running 2.x in production with java17 and then
> > > > java21.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 7:12 AM Reid Chan <re...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 on JDK17 for 3.x
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My vote is based on production experiences.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Servers (using 2.x) running on JDK17 had served very well for ~1 year
> > > > in
> > > > > my
> > > > > > production environment, the stability should not be a concern. (BTW,
> > > > > > switched to jdk 21 already)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > R.C
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 10:09 PM Duo Zhang <zh...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > HBase 3.0.0-beta-2 is about to come, it will be the last beta
> > > release
> > > > > > > and then we will release our first 3.x GA HBase.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is a discussion thread about dropping jdk8 support in HBase
> > > > > > > 3.x[1], we all agree to do this but there is no consensus on which
> > > > jdk
> > > > > > > version should be the minimum supported version yet, although there
> > > > > > > were some suggestions on jumping to jdk17 directly.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So here we open a new discussion thread to disucssion which version
> > > > to
> > > > > > > choose, jdk 11 or jdk 17?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Suggestions are welcome.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fy0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5&data=05%7C02%7Cdieterdp%40ngdata.com%7C05e75c702e0a4b1d67e508dc8b9c4409%7Cbe7affe0d1e145ca9c69fddf0939a55a%7C0%7C0%7C638538750501409897%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=n33Cksfy4kp5tD%2FPDe%2FI4zW30z6WfPSO2wiRrD6NmHs%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/y0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for HBase 3.x
Posted by "张铎(Duo Zhang)" <pa...@gmail.com>.
OK, so most of us suggested to jump directly to jdk17.
Let me send a NOTICE email to both user and dev list to announce this
and start the follow on tasks.
Thanks all for helping here!
Pankaj Kumar <pa...@gmail.com> 于2024年6月17日周一 12:23写道：
>
> +1 on JDK17 (minimum version) for 3.x.
>
> Regards,
> Pankaj
>
> On Mon, 17 Jun, 2024, 7:53 am Ankit Singhal, <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for JDK 17 as the minimum supported version for 3.x.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 at 16:55, rajeshbabu@apache.org <
> > chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for JDK17 for 3.x.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Rajeshbabu.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, 6:40 PM Dieter De Paepe
> > <dieterdp@ngdata.com.invalid
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Our production environment is also on java21 already.
> > > > +1 for Jdk 17.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Dieter
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Bryan Beaudreault <bb...@apache.org>
> > > > Sent: 13 June 2024 13:30
> > > > To: dev@hbase.apache.org <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for
> > > > HBase 3.x
> > > >
> > > > Same timeline for us running 2.x in production with java17 and then
> > > java21.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 7:12 AM Reid Chan <re...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 on JDK17 for 3.x
> > > > >
> > > > > My vote is based on production experiences.
> > > > >
> > > > > Servers (using 2.x) running on JDK17 had served very well for ~1 year
> > > in
> > > > my
> > > > > production environment, the stability should not be a concern. (BTW,
> > > > > switched to jdk 21 already)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > R.C
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 10:09 PM Duo Zhang <zh...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > HBase 3.0.0-beta-2 is about to come, it will be the last beta
> > release
> > > > > > and then we will release our first 3.x GA HBase.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is a discussion thread about dropping jdk8 support in HBase
> > > > > > 3.x[1], we all agree to do this but there is no consensus on which
> > > jdk
> > > > > > version should be the minimum supported version yet, although there
> > > > > > were some suggestions on jumping to jdk17 directly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So here we open a new discussion thread to disucssion which version
> > > to
> > > > > > choose, jdk 11 or jdk 17?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Suggestions are welcome.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1.
> > > >
> > >
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fy0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5&data=05%7C02%7Cdieterdp%40ngdata.com%7C05e75c702e0a4b1d67e508dc8b9c4409%7Cbe7affe0d1e145ca9c69fddf0939a55a%7C0%7C0%7C638538750501409897%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=n33Cksfy4kp5tD%2FPDe%2FI4zW30z6WfPSO2wiRrD6NmHs%3D&reserved=0
> > > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/y0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for HBase 3.x
Posted by Pankaj Kumar <pa...@gmail.com>.
+1 on JDK17 (minimum version) for 3.x.
Regards,
Pankaj
On Mon, 17 Jun, 2024, 7:53 am Ankit Singhal, <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 for JDK 17 as the minimum supported version for 3.x.
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 at 16:55, rajeshbabu@apache.org <
> chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for JDK17 for 3.x.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rajeshbabu.
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, 6:40 PM Dieter De Paepe
> <dieterdp@ngdata.com.invalid
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Our production environment is also on java21 already.
> > > +1 for Jdk 17.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Dieter
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Bryan Beaudreault <bb...@apache.org>
> > > Sent: 13 June 2024 13:30
> > > To: dev@hbase.apache.org <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for
> > > HBase 3.x
> > >
> > > Same timeline for us running 2.x in production with java17 and then
> > java21.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 7:12 AM Reid Chan <re...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 on JDK17 for 3.x
> > > >
> > > > My vote is based on production experiences.
> > > >
> > > > Servers (using 2.x) running on JDK17 had served very well for ~1 year
> > in
> > > my
> > > > production environment, the stability should not be a concern. (BTW,
> > > > switched to jdk 21 already)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > R.C
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 10:09 PM Duo Zhang <zh...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > HBase 3.0.0-beta-2 is about to come, it will be the last beta
> release
> > > > > and then we will release our first 3.x GA HBase.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is a discussion thread about dropping jdk8 support in HBase
> > > > > 3.x[1], we all agree to do this but there is no consensus on which
> > jdk
> > > > > version should be the minimum supported version yet, although there
> > > > > were some suggestions on jumping to jdk17 directly.
> > > > >
> > > > > So here we open a new discussion thread to disucssion which version
> > to
> > > > > choose, jdk 11 or jdk 17?
> > > > >
> > > > > Suggestions are welcome.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1.
> > >
> >
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fy0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5&data=05%7C02%7Cdieterdp%40ngdata.com%7C05e75c702e0a4b1d67e508dc8b9c4409%7Cbe7affe0d1e145ca9c69fddf0939a55a%7C0%7C0%7C638538750501409897%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=n33Cksfy4kp5tD%2FPDe%2FI4zW30z6WfPSO2wiRrD6NmHs%3D&reserved=0
> > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/y0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for HBase 3.x
Posted by Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 for JDK 17 as the minimum supported version for 3.x.
On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 at 16:55, rajeshbabu@apache.org <
chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for JDK17 for 3.x.
>
> Thanks,
> Rajeshbabu.
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, 6:40 PM Dieter De Paepe <dieterdp@ngdata.com.invalid
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Our production environment is also on java21 already.
> > +1 for Jdk 17.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dieter
> > ________________________________
> > From: Bryan Beaudreault <bb...@apache.org>
> > Sent: 13 June 2024 13:30
> > To: dev@hbase.apache.org <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for
> > HBase 3.x
> >
> > Same timeline for us running 2.x in production with java17 and then
> java21.
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 7:12 AM Reid Chan <re...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 on JDK17 for 3.x
> > >
> > > My vote is based on production experiences.
> > >
> > > Servers (using 2.x) running on JDK17 had served very well for ~1 year
> in
> > my
> > > production environment, the stability should not be a concern. (BTW,
> > > switched to jdk 21 already)
> > >
> > >
> > > ------
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > R.C
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 10:09 PM Duo Zhang <zh...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > HBase 3.0.0-beta-2 is about to come, it will be the last beta release
> > > > and then we will release our first 3.x GA HBase.
> > > >
> > > > There is a discussion thread about dropping jdk8 support in HBase
> > > > 3.x[1], we all agree to do this but there is no consensus on which
> jdk
> > > > version should be the minimum supported version yet, although there
> > > > were some suggestions on jumping to jdk17 directly.
> > > >
> > > > So here we open a new discussion thread to disucssion which version
> to
> > > > choose, jdk 11 or jdk 17?
> > > >
> > > > Suggestions are welcome.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > 1.
> >
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fy0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5&data=05%7C02%7Cdieterdp%40ngdata.com%7C05e75c702e0a4b1d67e508dc8b9c4409%7Cbe7affe0d1e145ca9c69fddf0939a55a%7C0%7C0%7C638538750501409897%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=n33Cksfy4kp5tD%2FPDe%2FI4zW30z6WfPSO2wiRrD6NmHs%3D&reserved=0
> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/y0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for HBase 3.x
Posted by "rajeshbabu@apache.org" <ch...@gmail.com>.
+1 for JDK17 for 3.x.
Thanks,
Rajeshbabu.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, 6:40 PM Dieter De Paepe <di...@ngdata.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Our production environment is also on java21 already.
> +1 for Jdk 17.
>
> Regards,
> Dieter
> ________________________________
> From: Bryan Beaudreault <bb...@apache.org>
> Sent: 13 June 2024 13:30
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for
> HBase 3.x
>
> Same timeline for us running 2.x in production with java17 and then java21.
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 7:12 AM Reid Chan <re...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 on JDK17 for 3.x
> >
> > My vote is based on production experiences.
> >
> > Servers (using 2.x) running on JDK17 had served very well for ~1 year in
> my
> > production environment, the stability should not be a concern. (BTW,
> > switched to jdk 21 already)
> >
> >
> > ------
> >
> > Best regards,
> > R.C
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 10:09 PM Duo Zhang <zh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > HBase 3.0.0-beta-2 is about to come, it will be the last beta release
> > > and then we will release our first 3.x GA HBase.
> > >
> > > There is a discussion thread about dropping jdk8 support in HBase
> > > 3.x[1], we all agree to do this but there is no consensus on which jdk
> > > version should be the minimum supported version yet, although there
> > > were some suggestions on jumping to jdk17 directly.
> > >
> > > So here we open a new discussion thread to disucssion which version to
> > > choose, jdk 11 or jdk 17?
> > >
> > > Suggestions are welcome.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > 1.
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fy0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5&data=05%7C02%7Cdieterdp%40ngdata.com%7C05e75c702e0a4b1d67e508dc8b9c4409%7Cbe7affe0d1e145ca9c69fddf0939a55a%7C0%7C0%7C638538750501409897%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=n33Cksfy4kp5tD%2FPDe%2FI4zW30z6WfPSO2wiRrD6NmHs%3D&reserved=0
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/y0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for HBase 3.x
Posted by Dieter De Paepe <di...@ngdata.com.INVALID>.
Our production environment is also on java21 already.
+1 for Jdk 17.
Regards,
Dieter
________________________________
From: Bryan Beaudreault <bb...@apache.org>
Sent: 13 June 2024 13:30
To: dev@hbase.apache.org <de...@hbase.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for HBase 3.x
Same timeline for us running 2.x in production with java17 and then java21.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 7:12 AM Reid Chan <re...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 on JDK17 for 3.x
>
> My vote is based on production experiences.
>
> Servers (using 2.x) running on JDK17 had served very well for ~1 year in my
> production environment, the stability should not be a concern. (BTW,
> switched to jdk 21 already)
>
>
> ------
>
> Best regards,
> R.C
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 10:09 PM Duo Zhang <zh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > HBase 3.0.0-beta-2 is about to come, it will be the last beta release
> > and then we will release our first 3.x GA HBase.
> >
> > There is a discussion thread about dropping jdk8 support in HBase
> > 3.x[1], we all agree to do this but there is no consensus on which jdk
> > version should be the minimum supported version yet, although there
> > were some suggestions on jumping to jdk17 directly.
> >
> > So here we open a new discussion thread to disucssion which version to
> > choose, jdk 11 or jdk 17?
> >
> > Suggestions are welcome.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > 1. https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fy0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5&data=05%7C02%7Cdieterdp%40ngdata.com%7C05e75c702e0a4b1d67e508dc8b9c4409%7Cbe7affe0d1e145ca9c69fddf0939a55a%7C0%7C0%7C638538750501409897%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=n33Cksfy4kp5tD%2FPDe%2FI4zW30z6WfPSO2wiRrD6NmHs%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.apache.org/thread/y0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5>
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for HBase 3.x
Posted by Bryan Beaudreault <bb...@apache.org>.
Same timeline for us running 2.x in production with java17 and then java21.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 7:12 AM Reid Chan <re...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 on JDK17 for 3.x
>
> My vote is based on production experiences.
>
> Servers (using 2.x) running on JDK17 had served very well for ~1 year in my
> production environment, the stability should not be a concern. (BTW,
> switched to jdk 21 already)
>
>
> ------
>
> Best regards,
> R.C
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 10:09 PM Duo Zhang <zh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > HBase 3.0.0-beta-2 is about to come, it will be the last beta release
> > and then we will release our first 3.x GA HBase.
> >
> > There is a discussion thread about dropping jdk8 support in HBase
> > 3.x[1], we all agree to do this but there is no consensus on which jdk
> > version should be the minimum supported version yet, although there
> > were some suggestions on jumping to jdk17 directly.
> >
> > So here we open a new discussion thread to disucssion which version to
> > choose, jdk 11 or jdk 17?
> >
> > Suggestions are welcome.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread/y0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for HBase 3.x
Posted by Reid Chan <re...@gmail.com>.
+1 on JDK17 for 3.x
My vote is based on production experiences.
Servers (using 2.x) running on JDK17 had served very well for ~1 year in my
production environment, the stability should not be a concern. (BTW,
switched to jdk 21 already)
------
Best regards,
R.C
On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 10:09 PM Duo Zhang <zh...@apache.org> wrote:
> HBase 3.0.0-beta-2 is about to come, it will be the last beta release
> and then we will release our first 3.x GA HBase.
>
> There is a discussion thread about dropping jdk8 support in HBase
> 3.x[1], we all agree to do this but there is no consensus on which jdk
> version should be the minimum supported version yet, although there
> were some suggestions on jumping to jdk17 directly.
>
> So here we open a new discussion thread to disucssion which version to
> choose, jdk 11 or jdk 17?
>
> Suggestions are welcome.
>
> Thanks.
>
> 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread/y0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for HBase 3.x
Posted by "张铎(Duo Zhang)" <pa...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Udo.
In the previous discussion thread, we also discussed this topic.
In general, we do not expect, and also do not suggest our users to
upgrade major hbase version and jdk version at the same time.
We will make branch-2.x to work with jdk8, jdk11 and jdk17, so users
could upgrade jdk version first on 2.x, and then try to upgrade to
3.x. Usually, moving from jdk8 to jdk11 will be a huge pain, but
moving from jdk11 to jdk17 will be much easier.
Udo Offermann <ud...@zfabrik.de> 于2024年6月10日周一 03:04写道：
>
> My opinion on this: If you choose jdk 11 as the minimum, it will be easier for many to migrate from HBase 2.3+ to 3.0.
>
> Best Regards
>
> > Am 09.06.2024 um 16:08 schrieb Duo Zhang <zh...@apache.org>:
> >
> > HBase 3.0.0-beta-2 is about to come, it will be the last beta release
> > and then we will release our first 3.x GA HBase.
> >
> > There is a discussion thread about dropping jdk8 support in HBase
> > 3.x[1], we all agree to do this but there is no consensus on which jdk
> > version should be the minimum supported version yet, although there
> > were some suggestions on jumping to jdk17 directly.
> >
> > So here we open a new discussion thread to disucssion which version to
> > choose, jdk 11 or jdk 17?
> >
> > Suggestions are welcome.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread/y0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for HBase 3.x
Posted by "张铎(Duo Zhang)" <pa...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Udo.
In the previous discussion thread, we also discussed this topic.
In general, we do not expect, and also do not suggest our users to
upgrade major hbase version and jdk version at the same time.
We will make branch-2.x to work with jdk8, jdk11 and jdk17, so users
could upgrade jdk version first on 2.x, and then try to upgrade to
3.x. Usually, moving from jdk8 to jdk11 will be a huge pain, but
moving from jdk11 to jdk17 will be much easier.
Udo Offermann <ud...@zfabrik.de> 于2024年6月10日周一 03:04写道：
>
> My opinion on this: If you choose jdk 11 as the minimum, it will be easier for many to migrate from HBase 2.3+ to 3.0.
>
> Best Regards
>
> > Am 09.06.2024 um 16:08 schrieb Duo Zhang <zh...@apache.org>:
> >
> > HBase 3.0.0-beta-2 is about to come, it will be the last beta release
> > and then we will release our first 3.x GA HBase.
> >
> > There is a discussion thread about dropping jdk8 support in HBase
> > 3.x[1], we all agree to do this but there is no consensus on which jdk
> > version should be the minimum supported version yet, although there
> > were some suggestions on jumping to jdk17 directly.
> >
> > So here we open a new discussion thread to disucssion which version to
> > choose, jdk 11 or jdk 17?
> >
> > Suggestions are welcome.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread/y0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum support jdk version to 11 or 17 for HBase 3.x
Posted by Udo Offermann <ud...@zfabrik.de>.
My opinion on this: If you choose jdk 11 as the minimum, it will be easier for many to migrate from HBase 2.3+ to 3.0.
Best Regards
> Am 09.06.2024 um 16:08 schrieb Duo Zhang <zh...@apache.org>:
>
> HBase 3.0.0-beta-2 is about to come, it will be the last beta release
> and then we will release our first 3.x GA HBase.
>
> There is a discussion thread about dropping jdk8 support in HBase
> 3.x[1], we all agree to do this but there is no consensus on which jdk
> version should be the minimum supported version yet, although there
> were some suggestions on jumping to jdk17 directly.
>
> So here we open a new discussion thread to disucssion which version to
> choose, jdk 11 or jdk 17?
>
> Suggestions are welcome.
>
> Thanks.
>
> 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread/y0pc3n1go0t26hjnp53dwcnkfxhffqx5