You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Gregor Moehler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/01/20 14:08:26 UTC
[jira] [Created] (SPARK-19311) UDFs disregard UDT type hierarchy
Gregor Moehler created SPARK-19311:
--------------------------------------
Summary: UDFs disregard UDT type hierarchy
Key: SPARK-19311
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19311
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Bug
Components: SQL
Affects Versions: 2.1.0
Reporter: Gregor Moehler
When you define UDTs based on hierarchical traits UDFs disregard the type hierarchy:
E.g. I have 2 UDTs based on 2 hierarchical traits. I then define 2 UDFs: The first one returns the derived type, the second takes the base type. This results in an error, although i believe it should be feasible:
(...)cannot resolve 'UDF(UDF(22))' due to data type mismatch: argument 1 requires exampleBaseType type, however, 'UDF(22)' is of exampleFirstSubType type.
The reason is that DataType defines
override private[sql] def acceptsType(dataType: DataType) =
this.getClass == dataType.getClass
However I believe it should be:
override private[sql] def acceptsType(dataType: DataType) = dataType match {
case other: UserDefinedType[_] =>
this.getClass == other.getClass ||
this.userClass.isAssignableFrom(other.userClass)
case _ => false
}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org