You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to woden-dev@ws.apache.org by "John Kaputin (gmail)" <ja...@gmail.com> on 2007/10/02 18:13:22 UTC
Can Axiom use Geronimo StAX API jar instead of Codehaus
I have successfully compiled and tested Woden's OM implementation using the
StAX api jar from Apache Geronimo. I'd like to know if Axiom could use this
jar file instead of the Codehaus stax-api-1.0.1.jar file. This would resolve
one remaining issue we have on the Woden incubator status file [1] about
verifying licenses for software included in the distribution. This change
would require a more thorough test of Axiom than my Woden-specific test.
The remaining issue we have concerns the license file specified for the
Codehaus stax-api-1.0.1.jar file in the Axiom distribution. Axiom specifies
the Apache 2.0 license, but we have not yet been able to determine with
certainty how the Axiom project came to use ASL 2.0 for this jar file. ASL
2.0 is not included in the original codehaus jar file and there's no
reference to ASL 2.0 on the StAX api project at the codehaus website.
We did get some responses a while back saying that:
a) licensing of StAX is complicated
b) ASL 2.0 is the correct license (but without any explanation of why)
c) BEA is the only authorative source
I think the simplest option is to use the Geronimo StAX API jar (with it's
ASL 2.0 license). Alternatively, I'll have to try the legal-discuss list to
try to resolve the license question.
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/woden.html
regards,
John Kaputin
Re: Can Axiom use Geronimo StAX API jar instead of Codehaus
Posted by Deepal jayasinghe <de...@gmail.com>.
Hi John,
> I have successfully compiled and tested Woden's OM implementation
> using the StAX api jar from Apache Geronimo. I'd like to know if
> Axiom could use this jar file instead of the Codehaus
> stax-api-1.0.1.jar file. This would resolve one remaining issue we
> have on the Woden incubator status file [1] about verifying licenses
> for software included in the distribution. This change would require a
> more thorough test of Axiom than my Woden-specific test.
Even though I have not tested Axiom with Apache Geronimo StaX jars , I
am sure that Axiom should work if they have implement the StaX API.
>
> The remaining issue we have concerns the license file specified for
> the Codehaus stax-api-1.0.1.jar file in the Axiom distribution. Axiom
> specifies the Apache 2.0 license, but we have not yet been able to
> determine with certainty how the Axiom project came to use ASL 2.0 for
> this jar file. ASL 2.0 is not included in the original codehaus jar
> file and there's no reference to ASL 2.0 on the StAX api project at
> the codehaus website.
>
> We did get some responses a while back saying that:
> a) licensing of StAX is complicated
> b) ASL 2.0 is the correct license (but without any explanation of why)
> c) BEA is the only authorative source
>
> I think the simplest option is to use the Geronimo StAX API jar (with
> it's ASL 2.0 license). Alternatively, I'll have to try the
> legal-discuss list to try to resolve the license question.
>
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/woden.html
>
> regards,
> John Kaputin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Can Axiom use Geronimo StAX API jar instead of Codehaus
Posted by Deepal jayasinghe <de...@gmail.com>.
Hi John,
> I have successfully compiled and tested Woden's OM implementation
> using the StAX api jar from Apache Geronimo. I'd like to know if
> Axiom could use this jar file instead of the Codehaus
> stax-api-1.0.1.jar file. This would resolve one remaining issue we
> have on the Woden incubator status file [1] about verifying licenses
> for software included in the distribution. This change would require a
> more thorough test of Axiom than my Woden-specific test.
Even though I have not tested Axiom with Apache Geronimo StaX jars , I
am sure that Axiom should work if they have implement the StaX API.
>
> The remaining issue we have concerns the license file specified for
> the Codehaus stax-api-1.0.1.jar file in the Axiom distribution. Axiom
> specifies the Apache 2.0 license, but we have not yet been able to
> determine with certainty how the Axiom project came to use ASL 2.0 for
> this jar file. ASL 2.0 is not included in the original codehaus jar
> file and there's no reference to ASL 2.0 on the StAX api project at
> the codehaus website.
>
> We did get some responses a while back saying that:
> a) licensing of StAX is complicated
> b) ASL 2.0 is the correct license (but without any explanation of why)
> c) BEA is the only authorative source
>
> I think the simplest option is to use the Geronimo StAX API jar (with
> it's ASL 2.0 license). Alternatively, I'll have to try the
> legal-discuss list to try to resolve the license question.
>
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/woden.html
>
> regards,
> John Kaputin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Can Axiom use Geronimo StAX API jar instead of Codehaus
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Excellent! David, thanks for the extremely quick turnaround.
John - We should update Woden to use an Axiom nightly build until the next
Axiom release so that we can pick up and test this change as we move
forward. I've updated the Woden status file to reflect this change in
dependencies.
Axis2 devs - Although tested it's possible this change may break an
assumption you're making. Thought you should all be informed.
Lawrence
"David Illsley" <da...@gmail.com>
10/02/2007 03:20 PM
Please respond to
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
To
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Can Axiom use Geronimo StAX API jar instead of Codehaus
Done. r581354
On 02/10/2007, David Illsley <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> John,
> A jar with known provenance seems like a good idea. I'm giving Axiom
> and Axis2 tests a go with the geronimo stax jar now. If they pass I'll
> commit the changes this evening.
> David
>
> On 02/10/2007, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have successfully compiled and tested Woden's OM implementation
using the
> > StAX api jar from Apache Geronimo. I'd like to know if Axiom could
use this
> > jar file instead of the Codehaus stax-api-1.0.1.jar file. This would
resolve
> > one remaining issue we have on the Woden incubator status file [1]
about
> > verifying licenses for software included in the distribution. This
change
> > would require a more thorough test of Axiom than my Woden-specific
test.
> >
> > The remaining issue we have concerns the license file specified for
the
> > Codehaus stax-api-1.0.1.jar file in the Axiom distribution. Axiom
specifies
> > the Apache 2.0 license, but we have not yet been able to determine
with
> > certainty how the Axiom project came to use ASL 2.0 for this jar file.
ASL
> > 2.0 is not included in the original codehaus jar file and there's no
> > reference to ASL 2.0 on the StAX api project at the codehaus website.
> >
> > We did get some responses a while back saying that:
> > a) licensing of StAX is complicated
> > b) ASL 2.0 is the correct license (but without any explanation of why)
> > c) BEA is the only authorative source
> >
> > I think the simplest option is to use the Geronimo StAX API jar (with
it's
> > ASL 2.0 license). Alternatively, I'll have to try the legal-discuss
list to
> > try to resolve the license question.
> >
> > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/woden.html
> >
> > regards,
> > John Kaputin
> >
>
>
> --
> David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development
>
--
David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Can Axiom use Geronimo StAX API jar instead of Codehaus
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Excellent! David, thanks for the extremely quick turnaround.
John - We should update Woden to use an Axiom nightly build until the next
Axiom release so that we can pick up and test this change as we move
forward. I've updated the Woden status file to reflect this change in
dependencies.
Axis2 devs - Although tested it's possible this change may break an
assumption you're making. Thought you should all be informed.
Lawrence
"David Illsley" <da...@gmail.com>
10/02/2007 03:20 PM
Please respond to
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
To
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Can Axiom use Geronimo StAX API jar instead of Codehaus
Done. r581354
On 02/10/2007, David Illsley <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> John,
> A jar with known provenance seems like a good idea. I'm giving Axiom
> and Axis2 tests a go with the geronimo stax jar now. If they pass I'll
> commit the changes this evening.
> David
>
> On 02/10/2007, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have successfully compiled and tested Woden's OM implementation
using the
> > StAX api jar from Apache Geronimo. I'd like to know if Axiom could
use this
> > jar file instead of the Codehaus stax-api-1.0.1.jar file. This would
resolve
> > one remaining issue we have on the Woden incubator status file [1]
about
> > verifying licenses for software included in the distribution. This
change
> > would require a more thorough test of Axiom than my Woden-specific
test.
> >
> > The remaining issue we have concerns the license file specified for
the
> > Codehaus stax-api-1.0.1.jar file in the Axiom distribution. Axiom
specifies
> > the Apache 2.0 license, but we have not yet been able to determine
with
> > certainty how the Axiom project came to use ASL 2.0 for this jar file.
ASL
> > 2.0 is not included in the original codehaus jar file and there's no
> > reference to ASL 2.0 on the StAX api project at the codehaus website.
> >
> > We did get some responses a while back saying that:
> > a) licensing of StAX is complicated
> > b) ASL 2.0 is the correct license (but without any explanation of why)
> > c) BEA is the only authorative source
> >
> > I think the simplest option is to use the Geronimo StAX API jar (with
it's
> > ASL 2.0 license). Alternatively, I'll have to try the legal-discuss
list to
> > try to resolve the license question.
> >
> > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/woden.html
> >
> > regards,
> > John Kaputin
> >
>
>
> --
> David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development
>
--
David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Can Axiom use Geronimo StAX API jar instead of Codehaus
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Excellent! David, thanks for the extremely quick turnaround.
John - We should update Woden to use an Axiom nightly build until the next
Axiom release so that we can pick up and test this change as we move
forward. I've updated the Woden status file to reflect this change in
dependencies.
Axis2 devs - Although tested it's possible this change may break an
assumption you're making. Thought you should all be informed.
Lawrence
"David Illsley" <da...@gmail.com>
10/02/2007 03:20 PM
Please respond to
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
To
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Can Axiom use Geronimo StAX API jar instead of Codehaus
Done. r581354
On 02/10/2007, David Illsley <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> John,
> A jar with known provenance seems like a good idea. I'm giving Axiom
> and Axis2 tests a go with the geronimo stax jar now. If they pass I'll
> commit the changes this evening.
> David
>
> On 02/10/2007, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have successfully compiled and tested Woden's OM implementation
using the
> > StAX api jar from Apache Geronimo. I'd like to know if Axiom could
use this
> > jar file instead of the Codehaus stax-api-1.0.1.jar file. This would
resolve
> > one remaining issue we have on the Woden incubator status file [1]
about
> > verifying licenses for software included in the distribution. This
change
> > would require a more thorough test of Axiom than my Woden-specific
test.
> >
> > The remaining issue we have concerns the license file specified for
the
> > Codehaus stax-api-1.0.1.jar file in the Axiom distribution. Axiom
specifies
> > the Apache 2.0 license, but we have not yet been able to determine
with
> > certainty how the Axiom project came to use ASL 2.0 for this jar file.
ASL
> > 2.0 is not included in the original codehaus jar file and there's no
> > reference to ASL 2.0 on the StAX api project at the codehaus website.
> >
> > We did get some responses a while back saying that:
> > a) licensing of StAX is complicated
> > b) ASL 2.0 is the correct license (but without any explanation of why)
> > c) BEA is the only authorative source
> >
> > I think the simplest option is to use the Geronimo StAX API jar (with
it's
> > ASL 2.0 license). Alternatively, I'll have to try the legal-discuss
list to
> > try to resolve the license question.
> >
> > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/woden.html
> >
> > regards,
> > John Kaputin
> >
>
>
> --
> David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development
>
--
David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Can Axiom use Geronimo StAX API jar instead of Codehaus
Posted by David Illsley <da...@gmail.com>.
Done. r581354
On 02/10/2007, David Illsley <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> John,
> A jar with known provenance seems like a good idea. I'm giving Axiom
> and Axis2 tests a go with the geronimo stax jar now. If they pass I'll
> commit the changes this evening.
> David
>
> On 02/10/2007, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have successfully compiled and tested Woden's OM implementation using the
> > StAX api jar from Apache Geronimo. I'd like to know if Axiom could use this
> > jar file instead of the Codehaus stax-api-1.0.1.jar file. This would resolve
> > one remaining issue we have on the Woden incubator status file [1] about
> > verifying licenses for software included in the distribution. This change
> > would require a more thorough test of Axiom than my Woden-specific test.
> >
> > The remaining issue we have concerns the license file specified for the
> > Codehaus stax-api-1.0.1.jar file in the Axiom distribution. Axiom specifies
> > the Apache 2.0 license, but we have not yet been able to determine with
> > certainty how the Axiom project came to use ASL 2.0 for this jar file. ASL
> > 2.0 is not included in the original codehaus jar file and there's no
> > reference to ASL 2.0 on the StAX api project at the codehaus website.
> >
> > We did get some responses a while back saying that:
> > a) licensing of StAX is complicated
> > b) ASL 2.0 is the correct license (but without any explanation of why)
> > c) BEA is the only authorative source
> >
> > I think the simplest option is to use the Geronimo StAX API jar (with it's
> > ASL 2.0 license). Alternatively, I'll have to try the legal-discuss list to
> > try to resolve the license question.
> >
> > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/woden.html
> >
> > regards,
> > John Kaputin
> >
>
>
> --
> David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development
>
--
David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Can Axiom use Geronimo StAX API jar instead of Codehaus
Posted by David Illsley <da...@gmail.com>.
John,
A jar with known provenance seems like a good idea. I'm giving Axiom
and Axis2 tests a go with the geronimo stax jar now. If they pass I'll
commit the changes this evening.
David
On 02/10/2007, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have successfully compiled and tested Woden's OM implementation using the
> StAX api jar from Apache Geronimo. I'd like to know if Axiom could use this
> jar file instead of the Codehaus stax-api-1.0.1.jar file. This would resolve
> one remaining issue we have on the Woden incubator status file [1] about
> verifying licenses for software included in the distribution. This change
> would require a more thorough test of Axiom than my Woden-specific test.
>
> The remaining issue we have concerns the license file specified for the
> Codehaus stax-api-1.0.1.jar file in the Axiom distribution. Axiom specifies
> the Apache 2.0 license, but we have not yet been able to determine with
> certainty how the Axiom project came to use ASL 2.0 for this jar file. ASL
> 2.0 is not included in the original codehaus jar file and there's no
> reference to ASL 2.0 on the StAX api project at the codehaus website.
>
> We did get some responses a while back saying that:
> a) licensing of StAX is complicated
> b) ASL 2.0 is the correct license (but without any explanation of why)
> c) BEA is the only authorative source
>
> I think the simplest option is to use the Geronimo StAX API jar (with it's
> ASL 2.0 license). Alternatively, I'll have to try the legal-discuss list to
> try to resolve the license question.
>
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/woden.html
>
> regards,
> John Kaputin
>
--
David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org