[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-629) Fuzzy search with eDisMax request handler

["Sidharth Negi (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16625412#comment-16625412 ] 

Sidharth Negi edited comment on SOLR-629 at 9/24/18 6:33 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

The patch doesn't seem to work with Solr 4.x, 5.x, 6.x, 7.x and above. Which version is this patch compatible with and has there been any progress on this for 6.x and above?

I think an update from disMax to eDisMax in description is needed.


was (Author: sidharth228):
The patch doesn't work with Solr 6.6 and above. Has there been any progress with this?

> Fuzzy search with eDisMax request handler
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-629
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-629
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: query parsers
>    Affects Versions: 7.4
>            Reporter: Guillaume Smet
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-629.patch, SOLR-629.patch, dismax_fuzzy_query_field.v0.1.diff, dismax_fuzzy_query_field.v0.1.diff
>
>
> The DisMax search handler doesn't support fuzzy queries which would be quite useful for our usage of Solr and from what I've seen on the list, it's something several people would like to have.
> Following this discussion http://markmail.org/message/tx6kqr7ga6ponefa#query:solr%20dismax%20fuzzy+page:1+mid:c4pciq6rlr4dwtgm+state:results , I added the ability to add fuzzy query field in the qf parameter. I kept the patch as conservative as possible.
> The syntax supported is: fieldOne^2.3 fieldTwo~0.3 fieldThree~0.2^-0.4 fieldFour as discussed in the above thread.
> The recursive query aliasing should work even with fuzzy query fields using a very simple rule: the aliased fields inherit the minSimilarity of their parent, combined with their own one if they have one.
> Only the qf parameter support this syntax atm. I suppose we should make it usable in pf too. Any opinion?
> Comments are very welcome, I'll spend the time needed to put this patch in good shape.
> Thanks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org