You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> on 2006/07/19 00:28:32 UTC
Corba specs for G 1.2
Right now we are using geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 in the
m2 build for G 1.2-SNAPSHOT. This is the only spec that we are using
that has the legacy geronimo-spec groupId.
Can we switch this to use one of these:
* org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-corba-2.3_spec:1.1
* org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-corba-3.0_spec:1.1
Or, can someone please explain why we have to keep using the old
geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 version?
--jason
Re: Corba specs for G 1.2
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Um... I have no clue when it comes to developing with Corba... and
hope not to need to start ;-)
--jason
On Jul 18, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I was going to JIRA this but figured since there is a conversation
> going on about the geronimo-spec-corba_2.3_spec jar I'd just post
> first and then jira...
>
> The CosNaming.NamingContext interface currently has the destroy
> method commented out with a statement that its 'not implemented
> yet'. Not sure if that is a hold over from trying to get things
> working with the Sun corba impl or not but I figured I'd mention it
> here and see if its already known or if a JIRA would be a good thing.
>
> TTFN,
>
> -bd-
>
> One more thing is to uncomment the destroy method on the
> CosNaming.NamingContext interface.
> On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:27 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> On Jul 18, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>> No. Both use that plugin. "new" uses the jacorb compiler (i.e.
>>> <compiler>jacorb</compiler>). "old" uses idlj (i.e.
>>> <compiler>idlj</compiler>).
>>
>> Any reason why we don't revert to use <compiler>idlj</compiler> on
>> the new spec modules so we can use them?
>>
>>
>>>> Where are the sources for the geronimo-spec-corba 1.0 that we
>>>> are using? I looked at branches/1_0 and tags/1_0 and I found
>>>> that the greonimo-spec-corba pom has an artifactId of geronimo-
>>>> corba_2.3_spec.
>>>
>>> Get the bucket out... The "old" corba spec is in geronimo/specs/
>>> trunk/geronimo-spec-corba/. Well, technically, the tagged version
>>> is in geronimo/specs/tags/1_1/geronimo-spec-corba/
>>
>> Kay, found it... thx... really confusing how the older version
>> (1_0 tag) has newer artifactId's.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>
Re: Corba specs for G 1.2
Posted by Bill Dudney <bd...@apache.org>.
Hi All,
I was going to JIRA this but figured since there is a conversation
going on about the geronimo-spec-corba_2.3_spec jar I'd just post
first and then jira...
The CosNaming.NamingContext interface currently has the destroy
method commented out with a statement that its 'not implemented yet'.
Not sure if that is a hold over from trying to get things working
with the Sun corba impl or not but I figured I'd mention it here and
see if its already known or if a JIRA would be a good thing.
TTFN,
-bd-
One more thing is to uncomment the destroy method on the
CosNaming.NamingContext interface.
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:27 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> No. Both use that plugin. "new" uses the jacorb compiler (i.e.
>> <compiler>jacorb</compiler>). "old" uses idlj (i.e.
>> <compiler>idlj</compiler>).
>
> Any reason why we don't revert to use <compiler>idlj</compiler> on
> the new spec modules so we can use them?
>
>
>>> Where are the sources for the geronimo-spec-corba 1.0 that we are
>>> using? I looked at branches/1_0 and tags/1_0 and I found that
>>> the greonimo-spec-corba pom has an artifactId of geronimo-
>>> corba_2.3_spec.
>>
>> Get the bucket out... The "old" corba spec is in geronimo/specs/
>> trunk/geronimo-spec-corba/. Well, technically, the tagged version
>> is in geronimo/specs/tags/1_1/geronimo-spec-corba/
>
> Kay, found it... thx... really confusing how the older version (1_0
> tag) has newer artifactId's.
>
> --jason
>
Re: Corba specs for G 1.2
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
On Jul 18, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> No. Both use that plugin. "new" uses the jacorb compiler (i.e.
> <compiler>jacorb</compiler>). "old" uses idlj (i.e. <compiler>idlj</
> compiler>).
Any reason why we don't revert to use <compiler>idlj</compiler> on
the new spec modules so we can use them?
>> Where are the sources for the geronimo-spec-corba 1.0 that we are
>> using? I looked at branches/1_0 and tags/1_0 and I found that the
>> greonimo-spec-corba pom has an artifactId of geronimo-corba_2.3_spec.
>
> Get the bucket out... The "old" corba spec is in geronimo/specs/
> trunk/geronimo-spec-corba/. Well, technically, the tagged version
> is in geronimo/specs/tags/1_1/geronimo-spec-corba/
Kay, found it... thx... really confusing how the older version (1_0
tag) has newer artifactId's.
--jason
Re: Corba specs for G 1.2
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 18, 2006, at 10:06 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> idlj-maven-plugin is the "new" IDL compiler?
No. Both use that plugin. "new" uses the jacorb compiler (i.e.
<compiler>jacorb</compiler>). "old" uses idlj (i.e. <compiler>idlj</
compiler>).
>
> Where are the sources for the geronimo-spec-corba 1.0 that we are
> using? I looked at branches/1_0 and tags/1_0 and I found that the
> greonimo-spec-corba pom has an artifactId of geronimo-corba_2.3_spec.
Get the bucket out... The "old" corba spec is in geronimo/specs/trunk/
geronimo-spec-corba/. Well, technically, the tagged version is in
geronimo/specs/tags/1_1/geronimo-spec-corba/
--kevan
>
> On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:45 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>
>>> Yikes... what version of the spec is geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-
>>> corba:1.0?
>>>
>>> Any idea how to fix specs:geronimo-corba-2.3_spec?
>>
>> The problem with the geronimo-corba-2.3 spec is that it's built
>> using the "new" IDL compiler. This compiler generated IDL that was
>> incompatible (i.e. would not work) with the Sun corba
>> implementation in 1.4. It was more than a TCK problem -- simply
>> enabling Corba caused the server to fail. I figured out that the
>> IDL was causing our problems, but didn't have the stomach for
>> looking at the IDL compiler. So, we went back to using the old-
>> style spec.
>>
>> As to why we continue to generate corba specs that don't work, I
>> hope that the Yoko project is finding them useful. Would also hope
>> that the compiler could be fixed...
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>>> --jason
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 18, 2006, at 3:32 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jason Dillon wrote:
>>>>> Right now we are using geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 in
>>>>> the m2 build for G 1.2-SNAPSHOT. This is the only spec that we
>>>>> are using that has the legacy geronimo-spec groupId.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we switch this to use one of these:
>>>>>
>>>>> * org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-corba-2.3_spec:1.1
>>>>> * org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-corba-3.0_spec:1.1
>>>>>
>>>>> Or, can someone please explain why we have to keep using the
>>>>> old geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 version?
>>>>>
>>>>> --jason
>>>> geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 is the "old" jar that we
>>>> know works w/ the TCK. The jar
>>>> org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-corba-2.3_spec:1.1 was tried
>>>> once but we couldn't get it to pass the TCK.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Corba specs for G 1.2
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
idlj-maven-plugin is the "new" IDL compiler?
Where are the sources for the geronimo-spec-corba 1.0 that we are
using? I looked at branches/1_0 and tags/1_0 and I found that the
greonimo-spec-corba pom has an artifactId of geronimo-corba_2.3_spec.
--jason
On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:45 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Yikes... what version of the spec is geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-
>> corba:1.0?
>>
>> Any idea how to fix specs:geronimo-corba-2.3_spec?
>
> The problem with the geronimo-corba-2.3 spec is that it's built
> using the "new" IDL compiler. This compiler generated IDL that was
> incompatible (i.e. would not work) with the Sun corba
> implementation in 1.4. It was more than a TCK problem -- simply
> enabling Corba caused the server to fail. I figured out that the
> IDL was causing our problems, but didn't have the stomach for
> looking at the IDL compiler. So, we went back to using the old-
> style spec.
>
> As to why we continue to generate corba specs that don't work, I
> hope that the Yoko project is finding them useful. Would also hope
> that the compiler could be fixed...
>
> --kevan
>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Jul 18, 2006, at 3:32 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>> Jason Dillon wrote:
>>>> Right now we are using geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 in
>>>> the m2 build for G 1.2-SNAPSHOT. This is the only spec that we
>>>> are using that has the legacy geronimo-spec groupId.
>>>>
>>>> Can we switch this to use one of these:
>>>>
>>>> * org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-corba-2.3_spec:1.1
>>>> * org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-corba-3.0_spec:1.1
>>>>
>>>> Or, can someone please explain why we have to keep using the old
>>>> geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 version?
>>>>
>>>> --jason
>>> geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 is the "old" jar that we
>>> know works w/ the TCK. The jar
>>> org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-corba-2.3_spec:1.1 was tried
>>> once but we couldn't get it to pass the TCK.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Corba specs for G 1.2
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:45 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Yikes... what version of the spec is geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-
> corba:1.0?
>
> Any idea how to fix specs:geronimo-corba-2.3_spec?
The problem with the geronimo-corba-2.3 spec is that it's built using
the "new" IDL compiler. This compiler generated IDL that was
incompatible (i.e. would not work) with the Sun corba implementation
in 1.4. It was more than a TCK problem -- simply enabling Corba
caused the server to fail. I figured out that the IDL was causing our
problems, but didn't have the stomach for looking at the IDL
compiler. So, we went back to using the old-style spec.
As to why we continue to generate corba specs that don't work, I hope
that the Yoko project is finding them useful. Would also hope that
the compiler could be fixed...
--kevan
> --jason
>
>
> On Jul 18, 2006, at 3:32 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> Jason Dillon wrote:
>>> Right now we are using geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 in
>>> the m2 build for G 1.2-SNAPSHOT. This is the only spec that we
>>> are using that has the legacy geronimo-spec groupId.
>>>
>>> Can we switch this to use one of these:
>>>
>>> * org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-corba-2.3_spec:1.1
>>> * org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-corba-3.0_spec:1.1
>>>
>>> Or, can someone please explain why we have to keep using the old
>>> geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 version?
>>>
>>> --jason
>> geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 is the "old" jar that we
>> know works w/ the TCK. The jar org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-
>> corba-2.3_spec:1.1 was tried once but we couldn't get it to pass
>> the TCK.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>
Re: Corba specs for G 1.2
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Yikes... what version of the spec is geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-
corba:1.0?
Any idea how to fix specs:geronimo-corba-2.3_spec?
--jason
On Jul 18, 2006, at 3:32 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Jason Dillon wrote:
>> Right now we are using geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 in
>> the m2 build for G 1.2-SNAPSHOT. This is the only spec that we
>> are using that has the legacy geronimo-spec groupId.
>>
>> Can we switch this to use one of these:
>>
>> * org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-corba-2.3_spec:1.1
>> * org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-corba-3.0_spec:1.1
>>
>> Or, can someone please explain why we have to keep using the old
>> geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 version?
>>
>> --jason
> geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 is the "old" jar that we know
> works w/ the TCK. The jar org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-
> corba-2.3_spec:1.1 was tried once but we couldn't get it to pass
> the TCK.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
Re: Corba specs for G 1.2
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Jason Dillon wrote:
> Right now we are using geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 in the m2
> build for G 1.2-SNAPSHOT. This is the only spec that we are using
> that has the legacy geronimo-spec groupId.
>
> Can we switch this to use one of these:
>
> * org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-corba-2.3_spec:1.1
> * org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-corba-3.0_spec:1.1
>
> Or, can someone please explain why we have to keep using the old
> geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 version?
>
> --jason
geronimo-spec:geronimo-spec-corba:1.0 is the "old" jar that we know
works w/ the TCK. The jar
org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-corba-2.3_spec:1.1 was tried once but
we couldn't get it to pass the TCK.
Regards,
Alan