You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by "C. Bergström" <cb...@netsyncro.com> on 2009/02/25 09:26:44 UTC
GSoC ideas for 09
Hi Everyone!
A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate in the
08 GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to see
what others think could be useful projects for Wicket.
Thanks
./Christopher
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by Sergio García <sg...@denodo.com>.
Better tree component maybe?
"C. Bergström" wrote:
>
>
> Hi Everyone!
>
> A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate in the
> 08 GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to see
> what others think could be useful projects for Wicket.
>
> Thanks
>
> ./Christopher
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GSoC-ideas-for-09-tp22198339p22204797.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by Marcelo Morales <ma...@gmail.com>.
You've got 86 unresolved enhancements and 32 feature requests on
issues.apache.org. The leaders might want to umbrella a couple of
related ones and have them coded on GSoC. Also, there might be a
couple of orphaned projects on wicketstuff and elsewhere that could
get into the main distribution. wicket-auth-roles appears lower
quality than the rest of wicket.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:26 AM, "C. Bergström"
<cb...@netsyncro.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone!
>
> A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate in the 08
> GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to see what
> others think could be useful projects for Wicket.
>
> Thanks
>
> ./Christopher
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Marcelo Morales
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by Richard Allen <ri...@gmail.com>.
I did some reading and found that a "mentoring organization" for the GSoC is
considered "A group running an active free/open source software project".
That seems to imply a core committer would need to be involved. See:
http://code.google.com/opensource/gsoc/2009/faqs.html#0_1_org_is_47611255748869674_1
The idea of Wicket participating in GSoC interests me. I work at Georgia
Tech Research Institute, which is a professional research arm of Georgia
Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech). We are located on the edge of the
Georgia Tech campus in Atlanta, Georgia. We have about 10 co-op students
from Georgia Tech working for us each semester. We use all open source
software. We have just started using Wicket, Spring, and Brix (CMS based on
Wicket and Jackrabbit) on a new project that I'm driving. I have two co-op
students helping me out right now. We have existing web applications that
use JEE, Struts, YUI, and Ext JS, which we deploy to Tomcat on Red Hat
Linux. We plan to migrate those existing applications to Wicket over the
next couple of years. Also, we are hiring:
http://jobview.monster.com/getjob.aspx?JobID=78669508
Considering our position, I'm wondering if we could be involved in this
somehow. Especially if it benefited us, it might be an easy sell to get some
of our engineers/scientists involved.
-Richard
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Martijn Dashorst <
martijn.dashorst@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems like a lame proposition to coerce us to do your bidding "just
> because you think it is a good idea". You're not the one to tell us
> how to spend our personal time, or whether the choices we make on how
> to spend our own time is lame or not.
>
> There's a Wicket Stuff project where anyone can commit, it is dead
> simple to setup a public github account, or create a google code
> project for any GSoC student and their mentor. There's no reason why
> *YOU* can't mentor a student on any project *YOU* think is a valid
> asset, and spend *YOUR* time on it.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:00 PM, "C. Bergström"
> <cb...@netsyncro.com> wrote:
> >
> > btw.. are any of the core devs interested or willing to mentor? Once
> again
> > it seems a lame excuse to say you're too busy or the various other things
> > when this could both give the project good pr and possibly add more
> people
> > who contribute to the framework.
> >
> > ./C
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by Richard Allen <ri...@gmail.com>.
Here is some info: http://code.google.com/opensource/gsoc/2009/faqs.html
I'll be happy to contribute my time also. The only catch is that I wouldn't
be considered a Wicket expert. I've only read Wicket in Action and I'm three
months into a professional application based on Wicket. However, I am a
seasoned Java and JEE developer. And I've co-authored two college text books
on the subject:
http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763754891/
http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763734237/
-Richard
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:13 AM, nino martinez wael <
nino.martinez.wael@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll be happy to mentor, what does it require?. I do have a life besides
> Wicket/Wicketstuff as Martijn has :)
>
>
>
> regards Nino
>
> 2009/2/26 Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>
>
> > While I am perfectly capable of working on Wicket in my spare time
> > without being rewarded, I find it way out of line to characterize the
> > way I spend my own time as lame when such that doesn't fit the
> > criteria of anyone. Being characterized as lame because we are engaged
> > in other things, such as family, preparing Wicket presentations,
> > building releases, fixing bugs, reading books, playing games, earning
> > money, eating, sleeping, feeding our children, is utterly uncalled for
> > (though sleeping might be considered lame).
> >
> > Christopher is very capable of writing English prose, so I take that
> > at face value. It's not that someone with a poor knowledge of English
> > wrote this.
> >
> > Armchair volunteerism is very easy to do: it doesn't cost any time,
> > and you don't commit yourself to anything.
> >
> > If anyone wants to pursue GSoC, they're very welcome to call
> > themselves Vice President of Wicket Stuff and enlist as Mentor etc. If
> > any of the other core committers thinks a GSoC is ok, I'm fine with
> > that too. However, given that we're struggling to get all the bugs
> > fixed in 1.3.6 and 1.4, I find it hard to believe that anyone will
> > have the time and energy to do the mentoring as well. I don't have
> > that time and energy.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Richard Allen
> > <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The words of C. Bergstrom may have been poorly chosen, but he seems to
> > have
> > > the same goal of wanting Wicket to succeed and grow in popularity.
> > Providing
> > > harsh responses to users that, despite poor communication, are
> otherwise
> > > excited about your project does not help to grow your community or get
> > > others involved. This is not the first time I've been surprised by the
> > > harshness of responses from Wicket core committers. I hope these don't
> > have
> > > the effect of pushing developers away.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Jeroen Steenbeeke <j.steenbeeke.ml@
> > > gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > Once again it seems a lame excuse to say you're too busy or the
> > various
> > >> > other things when this could both give the project good pr and
> > possibly
> > >> add
> > >> > more people who contribute to the framework.
> > >>
> > >> I've found that the best way to convince people does not involve
> > insulting
> > >> the person you're trying to convince. There is merit to your argument
> of
> > >> good PR and possible new contributors, but let's not forget that the
> > people
> > >> working on Wicket do so in their spare time - and you know that there
> > are a
> > >> lot of things in life that require time. It is fully understandable
> that
> > >> what little time the developers have to spend on Wicket, they'd rather
> > use
> > >> that time to improve the framework and fix bugs.
> > >> Mentoring a SoC student takes a considerable amount of time and
> > >> concentration, and while some students may blossom on their own, a lot
> > of
> > >> them need guidance on a regular basis - this requires a massive
> > investment
> > >> of spare time that could otherwise have been used for improving
> Wicket.
> > A
> > >> mentor that is only half interested will not be an advantage to the
> > >> student,
> > >> and be bad PR rather than good - you need mentors that are willing,
> > good,
> > >> know the framework well and have loads of time - the last of which
> does
> > not
> > >> apply to a lot of Wicket Devs. Calling it lame doesn't change anything
> > >> about
> > >> it, but it does agitate the developers, which doesn't exactly help
> your
> > >> cause.
> > >> - Jeroen
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> > Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by nino martinez wael <ni...@gmail.com>.
I'll be happy to mentor, what does it require?. I do have a life besides
Wicket/Wicketstuff as Martijn has :)
regards Nino
2009/2/26 Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>
> While I am perfectly capable of working on Wicket in my spare time
> without being rewarded, I find it way out of line to characterize the
> way I spend my own time as lame when such that doesn't fit the
> criteria of anyone. Being characterized as lame because we are engaged
> in other things, such as family, preparing Wicket presentations,
> building releases, fixing bugs, reading books, playing games, earning
> money, eating, sleeping, feeding our children, is utterly uncalled for
> (though sleeping might be considered lame).
>
> Christopher is very capable of writing English prose, so I take that
> at face value. It's not that someone with a poor knowledge of English
> wrote this.
>
> Armchair volunteerism is very easy to do: it doesn't cost any time,
> and you don't commit yourself to anything.
>
> If anyone wants to pursue GSoC, they're very welcome to call
> themselves Vice President of Wicket Stuff and enlist as Mentor etc. If
> any of the other core committers thinks a GSoC is ok, I'm fine with
> that too. However, given that we're struggling to get all the bugs
> fixed in 1.3.6 and 1.4, I find it hard to believe that anyone will
> have the time and energy to do the mentoring as well. I don't have
> that time and energy.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Richard Allen
> <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The words of C. Bergstrom may have been poorly chosen, but he seems to
> have
> > the same goal of wanting Wicket to succeed and grow in popularity.
> Providing
> > harsh responses to users that, despite poor communication, are otherwise
> > excited about your project does not help to grow your community or get
> > others involved. This is not the first time I've been surprised by the
> > harshness of responses from Wicket core committers. I hope these don't
> have
> > the effect of pushing developers away.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Jeroen Steenbeeke <j.steenbeeke.ml@
> > gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> >
> >> > Once again it seems a lame excuse to say you're too busy or the
> various
> >> > other things when this could both give the project good pr and
> possibly
> >> add
> >> > more people who contribute to the framework.
> >>
> >> I've found that the best way to convince people does not involve
> insulting
> >> the person you're trying to convince. There is merit to your argument of
> >> good PR and possible new contributors, but let's not forget that the
> people
> >> working on Wicket do so in their spare time - and you know that there
> are a
> >> lot of things in life that require time. It is fully understandable that
> >> what little time the developers have to spend on Wicket, they'd rather
> use
> >> that time to improve the framework and fix bugs.
> >> Mentoring a SoC student takes a considerable amount of time and
> >> concentration, and while some students may blossom on their own, a lot
> of
> >> them need guidance on a regular basis - this requires a massive
> investment
> >> of spare time that could otherwise have been used for improving Wicket.
> A
> >> mentor that is only half interested will not be an advantage to the
> >> student,
> >> and be bad PR rather than good - you need mentors that are willing,
> good,
> >> know the framework well and have loads of time - the last of which does
> not
> >> apply to a lot of Wicket Devs. Calling it lame doesn't change anything
> >> about
> >> it, but it does agitate the developers, which doesn't exactly help your
> >> cause.
> >> - Jeroen
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
While I am perfectly capable of working on Wicket in my spare time
without being rewarded, I find it way out of line to characterize the
way I spend my own time as lame when such that doesn't fit the
criteria of anyone. Being characterized as lame because we are engaged
in other things, such as family, preparing Wicket presentations,
building releases, fixing bugs, reading books, playing games, earning
money, eating, sleeping, feeding our children, is utterly uncalled for
(though sleeping might be considered lame).
Christopher is very capable of writing English prose, so I take that
at face value. It's not that someone with a poor knowledge of English
wrote this.
Armchair volunteerism is very easy to do: it doesn't cost any time,
and you don't commit yourself to anything.
If anyone wants to pursue GSoC, they're very welcome to call
themselves Vice President of Wicket Stuff and enlist as Mentor etc. If
any of the other core committers thinks a GSoC is ok, I'm fine with
that too. However, given that we're struggling to get all the bugs
fixed in 1.3.6 and 1.4, I find it hard to believe that anyone will
have the time and energy to do the mentoring as well. I don't have
that time and energy.
Martijn
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Richard Allen
<ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The words of C. Bergstrom may have been poorly chosen, but he seems to have
> the same goal of wanting Wicket to succeed and grow in popularity. Providing
> harsh responses to users that, despite poor communication, are otherwise
> excited about your project does not help to grow your community or get
> others involved. This is not the first time I've been surprised by the
> harshness of responses from Wicket core committers. I hope these don't have
> the effect of pushing developers away.
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Jeroen Steenbeeke <j.steenbeeke.ml@
> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >
>> > Once again it seems a lame excuse to say you're too busy or the various
>> > other things when this could both give the project good pr and possibly
>> add
>> > more people who contribute to the framework.
>>
>> I've found that the best way to convince people does not involve insulting
>> the person you're trying to convince. There is merit to your argument of
>> good PR and possible new contributors, but let's not forget that the people
>> working on Wicket do so in their spare time - and you know that there are a
>> lot of things in life that require time. It is fully understandable that
>> what little time the developers have to spend on Wicket, they'd rather use
>> that time to improve the framework and fix bugs.
>> Mentoring a SoC student takes a considerable amount of time and
>> concentration, and while some students may blossom on their own, a lot of
>> them need guidance on a regular basis - this requires a massive investment
>> of spare time that could otherwise have been used for improving Wicket. A
>> mentor that is only half interested will not be an advantage to the
>> student,
>> and be bad PR rather than good - you need mentors that are willing, good,
>> know the framework well and have loads of time - the last of which does not
>> apply to a lot of Wicket Devs. Calling it lame doesn't change anything
>> about
>> it, but it does agitate the developers, which doesn't exactly help your
>> cause.
>> - Jeroen
>>
>
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by Richard Allen <ri...@gmail.com>.
The words of C. Bergstrom may have been poorly chosen, but he seems to have
the same goal of wanting Wicket to succeed and grow in popularity. Providing
harsh responses to users that, despite poor communication, are otherwise
excited about your project does not help to grow your community or get
others involved. This is not the first time I've been surprised by the
harshness of responses from Wicket core committers. I hope these don't have
the effect of pushing developers away.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Jeroen Steenbeeke <j.steenbeeke.ml@
gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Once again it seems a lame excuse to say you're too busy or the various
> > other things when this could both give the project good pr and possibly
> add
> > more people who contribute to the framework.
>
> I've found that the best way to convince people does not involve insulting
> the person you're trying to convince. There is merit to your argument of
> good PR and possible new contributors, but let's not forget that the people
> working on Wicket do so in their spare time - and you know that there are a
> lot of things in life that require time. It is fully understandable that
> what little time the developers have to spend on Wicket, they'd rather use
> that time to improve the framework and fix bugs.
> Mentoring a SoC student takes a considerable amount of time and
> concentration, and while some students may blossom on their own, a lot of
> them need guidance on a regular basis - this requires a massive investment
> of spare time that could otherwise have been used for improving Wicket. A
> mentor that is only half interested will not be an advantage to the
> student,
> and be bad PR rather than good - you need mentors that are willing, good,
> know the framework well and have loads of time - the last of which does not
> apply to a lot of Wicket Devs. Calling it lame doesn't change anything
> about
> it, but it does agitate the developers, which doesn't exactly help your
> cause.
> - Jeroen
>
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by Jeroen Steenbeeke <j....@gmail.com>.
>
> Once again it seems a lame excuse to say you're too busy or the various
> other things when this could both give the project good pr and possibly add
> more people who contribute to the framework.
I've found that the best way to convince people does not involve insulting
the person you're trying to convince. There is merit to your argument of
good PR and possible new contributors, but let's not forget that the people
working on Wicket do so in their spare time - and you know that there are a
lot of things in life that require time. It is fully understandable that
what little time the developers have to spend on Wicket, they'd rather use
that time to improve the framework and fix bugs.
Mentoring a SoC student takes a considerable amount of time and
concentration, and while some students may blossom on their own, a lot of
them need guidance on a regular basis - this requires a massive investment
of spare time that could otherwise have been used for improving Wicket. A
mentor that is only half interested will not be an advantage to the student,
and be bad PR rather than good - you need mentors that are willing, good,
know the framework well and have loads of time - the last of which does not
apply to a lot of Wicket Devs. Calling it lame doesn't change anything about
it, but it does agitate the developers, which doesn't exactly help your
cause.
- Jeroen
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by "C. Bergström" <cb...@netsyncro.com>.
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Martijn
>
>
Thanks Martijn.. You've shown me what a good catalyst and community
leader you finally are.. It's not about my bidding.. I push for gsoc..
my points are valid.. others have brought up other good points.. and yet
when I push in general you make it personal. :) What's more is if you
were to even spend a short while and read or understand the gsoc process
you'd realize it's not something where you just fork and try to get it
sponsored..
http://groups.google.com/group/google-summer-of-code-announce/web/notes-on-organization-selection-criteria
I'd happily have mentored, but wasn't sure how the core devs felt about
that.. (guess my question is answered)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by "C. Bergström" <cb...@netsyncro.com>.
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Martijn
>
>
Thanks Martijn.. You've shown me what a good catalyst and community
leader you finally are.. It's not about my bidding.. I push for gsoc..
my points are valid.. others have brought up other good points.. and yet
when I push in general you make it personal. :) What's more is if you
were to even spend a short while and read or understand the gsoc process
you'd realize it's not something where you just fork and try to get it
sponsored..
http://groups.google.com/group/google-summer-of-code-announce/web/notes-on-organization-selection-criteria
I'd happily have mentored, but wasn't sure how the core devs felt about
that.. (guess my question is answered)
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
It seems like a lame proposition to coerce us to do your bidding "just
because you think it is a good idea". You're not the one to tell us
how to spend our personal time, or whether the choices we make on how
to spend our own time is lame or not.
There's a Wicket Stuff project where anyone can commit, it is dead
simple to setup a public github account, or create a google code
project for any GSoC student and their mentor. There's no reason why
*YOU* can't mentor a student on any project *YOU* think is a valid
asset, and spend *YOUR* time on it.
Martijn
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:00 PM, "C. Bergström"
<cb...@netsyncro.com> wrote:
>
> btw.. are any of the core devs interested or willing to mentor? Once again
> it seems a lame excuse to say you're too busy or the various other things
> when this could both give the project good pr and possibly add more people
> who contribute to the framework.
>
> ./C
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by "C. Bergström" <cb...@netsyncro.com>.
btw.. are any of the core devs interested or willing to mentor? Once
again it seems a lame excuse to say you're too busy or the various other
things when this could both give the project good pr and possibly add
more people who contribute to the framework.
./C
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by "C. Bergström" <cb...@netsyncro.com>.
btw.. are any of the core devs interested or willing to mentor? Once
again it seems a lame excuse to say you're too busy or the various other
things when this could both give the project good pr and possibly add
more people who contribute to the framework.
./C
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by Andreas Petersson <an...@petersson.at>.
> - tool to migrate JSF apps to Wicket (heh heh)
+1 for that. this would be the killer argument to finally start
transitioning to wicket.
it does not need to be a 100% converter of all jsf+backing beans - a
two-way method for sharing panels/components would enable better
transition to wicket.
just a quick half-baked idea how this may look:
using wicket in jsf
<w:panel clazz="com.example.SomeWebPage"
pageParameters="#{BackingBean.pageParams}"
xPath="/html/body/div[2]/div[2]"/>
and the other way round from jsf into wicket:
XPathExpression xPath = xpath.compile("/html/body/div[2]/div[2]");
add(new JsfPanel("jsfPanel","WEB-INF/somepage.jsp", xPath));
of course this means the whole page is rendered although only a part of
the markup is needed. would be sufficient for my usecase.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by Peter Thomas <pt...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Antony Stubbs <an...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 286 Portlet support has already been finished.
>
> Cheers,
> Tony.
>
Great! I had no idea, can you provide a link to read up about it, even a
JIRA would be fine.
>
>
> On 25/02/2009, at 2:20 PM, C. Bergström wrote:
>
> Peter Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, "C. Bergström" <
>>> cbergstrom@netsyncro.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Everyone!
>>>>
>>>> A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate in the
>>>> 08
>>>> GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to see what
>>>> others think could be useful projects for Wicket.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> A few ideas:
>>>
>>> - proper comet support
>>> - a comprehensive admin / debug console (jmx, view session size, page
>>> maps,
>>> html validator etc)
>>> - portlet support (JSR 286)
>>> - tool to migrate JSF apps to Wicket (heh heh)
>>> - better IDE plugin
>>>
>>>
>> Good ideas Peter
>>
>> Dare I stir up trouble and add
>>
>> - client cypher session state.. (Would be great for load balancing and
>> numerous other things.. yes I know this would be tough)
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by Antony Stubbs <an...@gmail.com>.
286 Portlet support has already been finished.
Cheers,
Tony.
On 25/02/2009, at 2:20 PM, C. Bergström wrote:
> Peter Thomas wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom@netsyncro.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi Everyone!
>>>
>>> A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate
>>> in the 08
>>> GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to see
>>> what
>>> others think could be useful projects for Wicket.
>>>
>>
>>
>> A few ideas:
>>
>> - proper comet support
>> - a comprehensive admin / debug console (jmx, view session size,
>> page maps,
>> html validator etc)
>> - portlet support (JSR 286)
>> - tool to migrate JSF apps to Wicket (heh heh)
>> - better IDE plugin
>>
>
> Good ideas Peter
>
> Dare I stir up trouble and add
>
> - client cypher session state.. (Would be great for load balancing
> and numerous other things.. yes I know this would be tough)
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by Antony Stubbs <an...@gmail.com>.
286 Portlet support has already been finished.
Cheers,
Tony.
On 25/02/2009, at 2:20 PM, C. Bergström wrote:
> Peter Thomas wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom@netsyncro.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi Everyone!
>>>
>>> A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate
>>> in the 08
>>> GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to see
>>> what
>>> others think could be useful projects for Wicket.
>>>
>>
>>
>> A few ideas:
>>
>> - proper comet support
>> - a comprehensive admin / debug console (jmx, view session size,
>> page maps,
>> html validator etc)
>> - portlet support (JSR 286)
>> - tool to migrate JSF apps to Wicket (heh heh)
>> - better IDE plugin
>>
>
> Good ideas Peter
>
> Dare I stir up trouble and add
>
> - client cypher session state.. (Would be great for load balancing
> and numerous other things.. yes I know this would be tough)
>
>
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by "C. Bergström" <cb...@netsyncro.com>.
Peter Thomas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, "C. Bergström" <cb...@netsyncro.com>wrote:
>
>
>> Hi Everyone!
>>
>> A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate in the 08
>> GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to see what
>> others think could be useful projects for Wicket.
>>
>
>
> A few ideas:
>
> - proper comet support
> - a comprehensive admin / debug console (jmx, view session size, page maps,
> html validator etc)
> - portlet support (JSR 286)
> - tool to migrate JSF apps to Wicket (heh heh)
> - better IDE plugin
>
Good ideas Peter
Dare I stir up trouble and add
- client cypher session state.. (Would be great for load balancing and
numerous other things.. yes I know this would be tough)
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by "C. Bergström" <cb...@netsyncro.com>.
Peter Thomas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, "C. Bergström" <cb...@netsyncro.com>wrote:
>
>
>> Hi Everyone!
>>
>> A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate in the 08
>> GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to see what
>> others think could be useful projects for Wicket.
>>
>
>
> A few ideas:
>
> - proper comet support
> - a comprehensive admin / debug console (jmx, view session size, page maps,
> html validator etc)
> - portlet support (JSR 286)
> - tool to migrate JSF apps to Wicket (heh heh)
> - better IDE plugin
>
Good ideas Peter
Dare I stir up trouble and add
- client cypher session state.. (Would be great for load balancing and
numerous other things.. yes I know this would be tough)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by Peter Thomas <pt...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, "C. Bergström" <cb...@netsyncro.com>wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone!
>
> A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate in the 08
> GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to see what
> others think could be useful projects for Wicket.
A few ideas:
- proper comet support
- a comprehensive admin / debug console (jmx, view session size, page maps,
html validator etc)
- portlet support (JSR 286)
- tool to migrate JSF apps to Wicket (heh heh)
- better IDE plugin
[Peter]
>
>
> Thanks
>
> ./Christopher
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by Johan Edstrom <jo...@opennms.org>.
Having done Gsoc for 2008 (Unrelated OSS project) I'd suggest
extremely well defined projects, extremely clear project management and
quite a few introductions for tasks expected, not to mention multiple
mentors (For picking up slack) defined targets and monitoring as if
this was a VC set of money you sat on and expected output from.
/je
On Feb 25, 2009, at 1:26 AM, C. Bergström wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone!
>
> A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate in
> the 08 GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to
> see what others think could be useful projects for Wicket.
>
> Thanks
>
> ./Christopher
Johan Edstrom
joed@opennms.org
They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by Johan Edstrom <jo...@opennms.org>.
Having done Gsoc for 2008 (Unrelated OSS project) I'd suggest
extremely well defined projects, extremely clear project management and
quite a few introductions for tasks expected, not to mention multiple
mentors (For picking up slack) defined targets and monitoring as if
this was a VC set of money you sat on and expected output from.
/je
On Feb 25, 2009, at 1:26 AM, C. Bergström wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone!
>
> A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate in
> the 08 GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to
> see what others think could be useful projects for Wicket.
>
> Thanks
>
> ./Christopher
Johan Edstrom
joed@opennms.org
They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
Re: GSoC ideas for 09
Posted by Marcelo Morales <ma...@gmail.com>.
You've got 86 unresolved enhancements and 32 feature requests on
issues.apache.org. The leaders might want to umbrella a couple of
related ones and have them coded on GSoC. Also, there might be a
couple of orphaned projects on wicketstuff and elsewhere that could
get into the main distribution. wicket-auth-roles appears lower
quality than the rest of wicket.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:26 AM, "C. Bergström"
<cb...@netsyncro.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone!
>
> A year ago I bugged dashorst about why Wicket didn't participate in the 08
> GSoC.. This year I've been brainstorming on ideas and want to see what
> others think could be useful projects for Wicket.
>
> Thanks
>
> ./Christopher
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Marcelo Morales
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org