You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Sérgio M. M. Ribeiro (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/10/18 16:33:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (VFS-676) VFS does not support several Zip file compression methods

Sérgio M. M. Ribeiro created VFS-676:
----------------------------------------

             Summary: VFS does not support several Zip file compression methods
                 Key: VFS-676
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-676
             Project: Commons VFS
          Issue Type: Improvement
    Affects Versions: 2.2, 2.2.1
            Reporter: Sérgio M. M. Ribeiro


VFS currently bases its ZipFileSystem implementation on the "java.util.zip" package, this makes it support *only* the +STORED+ and +DEFLATE+ compression methods.

If it were using *Apache Commons Compression*, it would support much more (check [https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-compress/zip.html#encryption)|https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-compress/zip.html#encryption);]. At the time this issue is being created the supported methods for version 1.18 are: STORED, DEFLATE, SHRINK, IMPLODE, BZIP2, DEFLATE64 (enhanced deflate).

 

It would be nice to have one of the following options:
 # Change the current implementation to use Apache Commons Compression (this would, most probably, make Apache Commons Compression a non-optional dependency);
 # Add an Apache Commons Compression based provider and have some (easy) way of letting the user decide which implementation to use.

 

The first option would make Apache Commons Compress a *non-optional* dependency while the second one could allow it to continue as optional.

Currently, if Apache Commons Compress is available, one has access to both Bzip2FileProvider and TarFileProvider - a strategy that could be used to decide which ZipFileSystem implementation to use.

 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)