You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@commons.apache.org by Roger Hoover <ro...@gmail.com> on 2009/04/24 06:45:44 UTC
Re: [SCXML] Javascript as expression language
Hi Ingmar,
Did this ever get released?
Thanks,
Roger
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Ingmar Kliche
> <in...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Roger,
> >
> > yes, we have implemented it and plan to provide it to the project quite
> > soon. But the licensing issue is a good point and should be clarified.
> > Technically the implementation needs some final cleanup and things like
> test
> > cases. If you can wait another couple of weeks (due to holiday season) it
> > should be available.
> >
> <snip/>
>
> Looking forward to it as well (that will reduce the min. JDK
> requirement for using Rhino I presume).
>
> -Rahul
>
>
>
> > Regards,
> > Ingmar.
> >
> > 2008/12/16 Roger Hoover <ro...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Has anyone implemented Javascript as an expression language in SCXML
> Common
> >> with Rhino? Would there be licensing issues with SCXML under Apache
> >> license
> >> and Rhino under MPL/GPL/LGPL triple license?
> >>
> >> If it can't be done as part of this project, how hard would it be to
> >> implement externally and do others have interest in it?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Roger
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
Re: [SCXML] Javascript as expression language
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Roger Hoover <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ingmar,
>
> Did this ever get released?
>
<snip/>
Not as part of Commons SCXML yet, which is the bit I'm more aware of.
-Rahul
> Thanks,
>
> Roger
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Ingmar Kliche
>> <in...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Roger,
>> >
>> > yes, we have implemented it and plan to provide it to the project quite
>> > soon. But the licensing issue is a good point and should be clarified.
>> > Technically the implementation needs some final cleanup and things like
>> test
>> > cases. If you can wait another couple of weeks (due to holiday season) it
>> > should be available.
>> >
>> <snip/>
>>
>> Looking forward to it as well (that will reduce the min. JDK
>> requirement for using Rhino I presume).
>>
>> -Rahul
>>
>>
>>
>> > Regards,
>> > Ingmar.
>> >
>> > 2008/12/16 Roger Hoover <ro...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Has anyone implemented Javascript as an expression language in SCXML
>> Common
>> >> with Rhino? Would there be licensing issues with SCXML under Apache
>> >> license
>> >> and Rhino under MPL/GPL/LGPL triple license?
>> >>
>> >> If it can't be done as part of this project, how hard would it be to
>> >> implement externally and do others have interest in it?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> Roger
>> >>
>> >
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [SCXML] Javascript as expression language
Posted by Roger Hoover <ro...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ingmar,
I'm not in a hurry but wanted to know if this was still likely to happen.
Thanks for the reply!
Roger
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Ingmar Kliche <ingmar.kliche@googlemail.com
> wrote:
> Hi Roger,
> you are right - this is still an open issue. Sorry for the "delay".
> Beginning from May (this year ;-) I will have a (part time) intern and I
> will put him on this issue first. So there is good hope. If you can wait
> for
> another few days? Sorry again.
>
> - Ingmar.
>
> 2009/4/24 Roger Hoover <ro...@gmail.com>
>
> > Hi Ingmar,
> >
> > Did this ever get released?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Roger
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Ingmar Kliche
> > > <in...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi Roger,
> > > >
> > > > yes, we have implemented it and plan to provide it to the project
> quite
> > > > soon. But the licensing issue is a good point and should be
> clarified.
> > > > Technically the implementation needs some final cleanup and things
> like
> > > test
> > > > cases. If you can wait another couple of weeks (due to holiday
> season)
> > it
> > > > should be available.
> > > >
> > > <snip/>
> > >
> > > Looking forward to it as well (that will reduce the min. JDK
> > > requirement for using Rhino I presume).
> > >
> > > -Rahul
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Ingmar.
> > > >
> > > > 2008/12/16 Roger Hoover <ro...@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> Has anyone implemented Javascript as an expression language in SCXML
> > > Common
> > > >> with Rhino? Would there be licensing issues with SCXML under Apache
> > > >> license
> > > >> and Rhino under MPL/GPL/LGPL triple license?
> > > >>
> > > >> If it can't be done as part of this project, how hard would it be to
> > > >> implement externally and do others have interest in it?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >>
> > > >> Roger
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [SCXML] Javascript as expression language
Posted by Ingmar Kliche <in...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Roger,
you are right - this is still an open issue. Sorry for the "delay".
Beginning from May (this year ;-) I will have a (part time) intern and I
will put him on this issue first. So there is good hope. If you can wait for
another few days? Sorry again.
- Ingmar.
2009/4/24 Roger Hoover <ro...@gmail.com>
> Hi Ingmar,
>
> Did this ever get released?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roger
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Ingmar Kliche
> > <in...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Roger,
> > >
> > > yes, we have implemented it and plan to provide it to the project quite
> > > soon. But the licensing issue is a good point and should be clarified.
> > > Technically the implementation needs some final cleanup and things like
> > test
> > > cases. If you can wait another couple of weeks (due to holiday season)
> it
> > > should be available.
> > >
> > <snip/>
> >
> > Looking forward to it as well (that will reduce the min. JDK
> > requirement for using Rhino I presume).
> >
> > -Rahul
> >
> >
> >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ingmar.
> > >
> > > 2008/12/16 Roger Hoover <ro...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Has anyone implemented Javascript as an expression language in SCXML
> > Common
> > >> with Rhino? Would there be licensing issues with SCXML under Apache
> > >> license
> > >> and Rhino under MPL/GPL/LGPL triple license?
> > >>
> > >> If it can't be done as part of this project, how hard would it be to
> > >> implement externally and do others have interest in it?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Roger
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>