You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2006/11/24 20:06:13 UTC
Voting a release in the podling list with IPMC binding votes, was: Re: Notification of a(nother) release vote for Tuscany
So, just to make sure I understand it now, even tough we might have three +1
IPMC binding votes in the podlign dev-list, we would still have to run a
voting thread on this list and wait for three +1 IPMC biding votes ?
On 11/22/06, robert burrell donkin <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/22/06, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes Jeremy, this is my understanding as well...
> > If we get the three IPMC +1 votes on Tuscany devlist, we could do
> something
> > simmilar to this thread :
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40incubator.apache.org/msg11681.html
>
> this example may be misleading
>
> that's for the acceptance of a new podling. the process for this case
> is lazy consensus. no IPMC vote is required at all. if any IPMC
> objects then they need to -1 and force a vote on the issue.
>
> release votes *always* require active approval which is why 3 IPMC
> votes are required
>
> note that there is a very vocal and quite sizable group of IPMCers who
> object to IPMC releases votes being held on podling lists
>
> FWIW i don't understand why given a quorum of three IPMCers in favour
> of a release there should be any problem passing a vote on the general
> list. the usual issue with releases is a lack of interested IPMCs not
> active obstruction...
>
> - robert
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
Re: Voting a release in the podling list with IPMC binding votes, was: Re: Notification of a(nother) release vote for Tuscany
Posted by Jeremy Hughes <hu...@apache.org>.
Apologies, wrong list.
On 11/30/06, Jeremy Hughes <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> FYI all budding Woden release managers ... a vote on general@incubator
> may be unnecessary ...
>
> On 11/29/06, Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> > On 11/24/06, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > So, just to make sure I understand it now, even tough we might have three +1
> > > IPMC binding votes in the podlign dev-list, we would still have to run a
> > > voting thread on this list and wait for three +1 IPMC biding votes ?
> >
> > No. You should just send a notice to general@incubator that you've
> > reached quorum on another list and include who voted, email thread
> > links, etc. You might want to let that email sit for 72 hours to let
> > other have a chance to review the release as well. But, you don't
> > *need* to get any more votes at that point; but the IPMC via the
> > general list does need to be informed about the release.
> >
> > HTH. -- justin
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Voting a release in the podling list with IPMC binding votes, was: Re: Notification of a(nother) release vote for Tuscany
Posted by Jeremy Hughes <hu...@apache.org>.
FYI all budding Woden release managers ... a vote on general@incubator
may be unnecessary ...
On 11/29/06, Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> On 11/24/06, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So, just to make sure I understand it now, even tough we might have three +1
> > IPMC binding votes in the podlign dev-list, we would still have to run a
> > voting thread on this list and wait for three +1 IPMC biding votes ?
>
> No. You should just send a notice to general@incubator that you've
> reached quorum on another list and include who voted, email thread
> links, etc. You might want to let that email sit for 72 hours to let
> other have a chance to review the release as well. But, you don't
> *need* to get any more votes at that point; but the IPMC via the
> general list does need to be informed about the release.
>
> HTH. -- justin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Fwd: Voting a release in the podling list with IPMC binding votes, was: Re: Notification of a(nother) release vote for Tuscany
Posted by Jeremy Hughes <hu...@apache.org>.
FYI all budding Woden release managers ... a vote on general@incubator
may be unnecessary ...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>
Date: Nov 29, 2006 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: Voting a release in the podling list with IPMC binding
votes, was: Re: Notification of a(nother) release vote for Tuscany
To: general@incubator.apache.org
On 11/24/06, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, just to make sure I understand it now, even tough we might have three +1
> IPMC binding votes in the podlign dev-list, we would still have to run a
> voting thread on this list and wait for three +1 IPMC biding votes ?
No. You should just send a notice to general@incubator that you've
reached quorum on another list and include who voted, email thread
links, etc. You might want to let that email sit for 72 hours to let
other have a chance to review the release as well. But, you don't
*need* to get any more votes at that point; but the IPMC via the
general list does need to be informed about the release.
HTH. -- justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Voting a release in the podling list with IPMC binding votes, was: Re: Notification of a(nother) release vote for Tuscany
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>.
On 11/24/06, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, just to make sure I understand it now, even tough we might have three +1
> IPMC binding votes in the podlign dev-list, we would still have to run a
> voting thread on this list and wait for three +1 IPMC biding votes ?
No. You should just send a notice to general@incubator that you've
reached quorum on another list and include who voted, email thread
links, etc. You might want to let that email sit for 72 hours to let
other have a chance to review the release as well. But, you don't
*need* to get any more votes at that point; but the IPMC via the
general list does need to be informed about the release.
HTH. -- justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org