You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Marco Martinez <mm...@paradigmatecnologico.com> on 2010/05/17 17:49:06 UTC
Re: Targeting two fields with the same query or one field gathering
contents from both ?
No, the equivalent for this will be:
- A: (the lazy fox) *OR* B: (the lazy fox)
- C: (the lazy fox)
Imagine the situation that you dont have in B 'the lazy fox', with the AND
you get 0 results although you have 'the lazy fox' in A and C
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2010/5/17 Xavier Schepler <xa...@sciences-po.fr>
> Hey,
>
> let's say I have :
>
> - a field named A with specific contents
>
> - a field named B with specific contents
>
> - a field named C witch contents only from A and B added with copyField.
>
> Are those queries equivalents in terms of performance :
>
> - A: (the lazy fox) AND B: (the lazy fox)
> - C: (the lazy fox)
>
> ??
>
> Thanks,
>
> Xavier
>
>
>
>
Re: Targeting two fields with the same query or one field gathering
contents from both ?
Posted by Xavier Schepler <xa...@sciences-po.fr>.
Le 17/05/2010 17:49, Marco Martinez a écrit :
> No, the equivalent for this will be:
>
> - A: (the lazy fox) *OR* B: (the lazy fox)
> - C: (the lazy fox)
>
>
> Imagine the situation that you dont have in B 'the lazy fox', with the AND
> you get 0 results although you have 'the lazy fox' in A and C
>
> Marco Martínez Bautista
> http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
> Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
> 28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
> Tel.: 91 352 59 42
>
>
> 2010/5/17 Xavier Schepler<xa...@sciences-po.fr>
>
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> let's say I have :
>>
>> - a field named A with specific contents
>>
>> - a field named B with specific contents
>>
>> - a field named C witch contents only from A and B added with copyField.
>>
>> Are those queries equivalents in terms of performance :
>>
>> - A: (the lazy fox) AND B: (the lazy fox)
>> - C: (the lazy fox)
>>
>> ??
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Xavier
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
yes you're right I figured it after posting.