You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by Cassie <do...@google.com> on 2008/08/01 06:48:05 UTC
Re: [jira] Created: (SHINDIG-481) Use unique shindig namespace for
values in gadgets.properties
+1 from me.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@hi5.com> wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2008, at 6:29 PM, Kevin Brown wrote:
>
> It makes sense to me, though since they're strings it'll mean a bit of
>> find
>> and replace work. If you want to take care of it, though, I don't see any
>> big issues with it.
>>
>>
> Thanks, this will help with our integration at hi5 quite a bit.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@hi5.com> wrote:
>>
>> What do people think about this proposal?
>>>
>>> It would involve modifying the names used in gadget.properties and @Named
>>> annotations.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 30, 2008, at 3:37 AM, Paul Lindner (JIRA) wrote:
>>>
>>> Use unique shindig namespace for values in gadgets.properties
>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Key: SHINDIG-481
>>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-481
>>>> Project: Shindig
>>>> Issue Type: Improvement
>>>> Components: Common Components (Java)
>>>> Reporter: Paul Lindner
>>>> Assignee: Paul Lindner
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> By overriding DefaultGuiceModule I was able to replace the properties
>>>> source with our common properties source.
>>>>
>>>> If this becomes common practice it would be preferable to namespace the
>>>> names in gadgets.properties by adding a 'shindig.' prefix.
>>>>
>>>> For example
>>>>
>>>> http.cache.negativeCacheTtl
>>>>
>>>> becomes
>>>>
>>>> shindig.http.cache.negativeCacheTtl=30000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>>> -
>>>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Paul Lindner
>>> plindner@hi5.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> Paul Lindner
> plindner@hi5.com
>
>
>
>