Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.5 Release Candidate 5 as hbase-0.20.5?

[Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>]

-1 

Mail to follow.

   - Andy



      

Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.5 Release Candidate 5 as hbase-0.20.5?

[Dave Latham <la...@davelink.net>]

+1

Ran it through a set of representative MR jobs that read/write to different
tables in a cluster we are preparing to migrate to.  Didn't hit any problems
or any of the issues we've had with earlier release candidates.

Dave

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:

> +1
>
> I ran YCSB 50/50 against a small cluster hosting the candidate
> overnight w/ 100 threads.  This morning I added mini scans on top of
> YCSB and then added concurrent sequential writing.
>
> The doc. looks fine.
>
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > The issue has something to do with having -ROOT- and .META. on the
> > same server which is a rare event given that the assignment function
> > will only do this if if finds the cluster is made of one server only
> > (On ec2, where the issue was found, using our ec2 scripts, this is a
> > more likely given how there can be a lag as servers come in after
> > master startup).
> >
> > I have been trying to reproduce and have not been having much luck.
> > I'm sure there is something in here and with more time, we'll narrow
> > in on the trigger but my thought, after talking with Andrew offline,
> > is to change his -1 to a +0, that this should not sink the current
> > release candidate, and that he we'll get it next time around in
> > 0.20.6.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> See my other mail today.
> >>
> >> If I have it wrong, please feel free to change my vote to 0.
> >>
> >> I will be out of touch for 24 hours+.
> >>
> >>   - Andy
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.5 Release Candidate 5 as hbase-0.20.5?

[Stack <st...@duboce.net>]

+1

I ran YCSB 50/50 against a small cluster hosting the candidate
overnight w/ 100 threads.  This morning I added mini scans on top of
YCSB and then added concurrent sequential writing.

The doc. looks fine.

St.Ack


On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> The issue has something to do with having -ROOT- and .META. on the
> same server which is a rare event given that the assignment function
> will only do this if if finds the cluster is made of one server only
> (On ec2, where the issue was found, using our ec2 scripts, this is a
> more likely given how there can be a lag as servers come in after
> master startup).
>
> I have been trying to reproduce and have not been having much luck.
> I'm sure there is something in here and with more time, we'll narrow
> in on the trigger but my thought, after talking with Andrew offline,
> is to change his -1 to a +0, that this should not sink the current
> release candidate, and that he we'll get it next time around in
> 0.20.6.
>
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
>> See my other mail today.
>>
>> If I have it wrong, please feel free to change my vote to 0.
>>
>> I will be out of touch for 24 hours+.
>>
>>   - Andy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.5 Release Candidate 5 as hbase-0.20.5?

[Stack <st...@duboce.net>]

The issue has something to do with having -ROOT- and .META. on the
same server which is a rare event given that the assignment function
will only do this if if finds the cluster is made of one server only
(On ec2, where the issue was found, using our ec2 scripts, this is a
more likely given how there can be a lag as servers come in after
master startup).

I have been trying to reproduce and have not been having much luck.
I'm sure there is something in here and with more time, we'll narrow
in on the trigger but my thought, after talking with Andrew offline,
is to change his -1 to a +0, that this should not sink the current
release candidate, and that he we'll get it next time around in
0.20.6.

St.Ack


On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> See my other mail today.
>
> If I have it wrong, please feel free to change my vote to 0.
>
> I will be out of touch for 24 hours+.
>
>   - Andy
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.5 Release Candidate 5 as hbase-0.20.5?

[Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>]

See my other mail today.

If I have it wrong, please feel free to change my vote to 0.

I will be out of touch for 24 hours+.

   - Andy