You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lens.apache.org by "amareshwarisr ." <am...@gmail.com> on 2015/05/13 06:56:41 UTC
Re: Move to Java 7?
I propose, we support compiling with java7 for some more time. Few reasons
1. Most of the production setup is still with java7.
2. Lens build with java8 has some issues. We are not sure we uncovered
all.
3. Many projects work with java7 and most of us have java7 in our
machines.
What do others think?
Thanks
Amareshwari
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Jaideep Dhok <ja...@inmobi.com>
wrote:
> That would be even better.
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan <
> sriksun@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jaideep,
> > Java7 EOL is already announced, can we consider Java 8 instead ?
> >
> > Regards
> > Srikanth Sundarrajan
> >
> > > Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:55:13 +0530
> > > Subject: Move to Java 7?
> > > From: jaideep.dhok@inmobi.com
> > > To: dev@lens.incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > > I was thinking we should move to Java 7 as the compiler version and
> start
> > > using niceties like try with resources. I think most devs are already
> > > using Java 7 to build and develop but the version in POM is still 1.6.
> > >
> > > Java 7 is already officially supported by Hadoop 2.x
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jaideep
> > >
> > > --
> > > _____________________________________________________________
> > > The information contained in this communication is intended solely for
> > the
> > > use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others
> > > authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally
> > privileged
> > > information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby
> > notified
> > > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in
> > reliance
> > > on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
> > > unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify
> > > us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your
> > > system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete
> > transmission
> > > of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in
> > its
> > > receipt.
> >
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________
> The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others
> authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged
> information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance
> on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your
> system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission
> of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its
> receipt.
>
Re: Move to Java 7?
Posted by "amareshwarisr ." <am...@gmail.com>.
Yes, Srikanth. Lens runs fine with java8 runtime. But it needs to be
documented in deployment guide.
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Srikanth Sundarrajan <sr...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> IMHO, As a bare minimum, we need to support LENS to run on Java8. Using
> java7 for compilation in the interim till we sort out issues with java 8
> should be largely acceptable.
>
> Regards
> Srikanth Sundarrajan
>
> > Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:26:41 +0530
> > Subject: Re: Move to Java 7?
> > From: amareshwari@gmail.com
> > To: dev@lens.incubator.apache.org
> >
> > I propose, we support compiling with java7 for some more time. Few
> reasons
> >
> > 1. Most of the production setup is still with java7.
> > 2. Lens build with java8 has some issues. We are not sure we uncovered
> > all.
> > 3. Many projects work with java7 and most of us have java7 in our
> > machines.
> >
> > What do others think?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Amareshwari
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Jaideep Dhok <ja...@inmobi.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > That would be even better.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan <
> > > sriksun@hotmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Jaideep,
> > > > Java7 EOL is already announced, can we consider Java 8 instead ?
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Srikanth Sundarrajan
> > > >
> > > > > Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:55:13 +0530
> > > > > Subject: Move to Java 7?
> > > > > From: jaideep.dhok@inmobi.com
> > > > > To: dev@lens.incubator.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > I was thinking we should move to Java 7 as the compiler version and
> > > start
> > > > > using niceties like try with resources. I think most devs are
> already
> > > > > using Java 7 to build and develop but the version in POM is still
> 1.6.
> > > > >
> > > > > Java 7 is already officially supported by Hadoop 2.x
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Jaideep
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > _____________________________________________________________
> > > > > The information contained in this communication is intended solely
> for
> > > > the
> > > > > use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others
> > > > > authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally
> > > > privileged
> > > > > information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby
> > > > notified
> > > > > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in
> > > > reliance
> > > > > on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may
> be
> > > > > unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
> > > notify
> > > > > us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from
> your
> > > > > system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete
> > > > transmission
> > > > > of the information contained in this communication nor for any
> delay in
> > > > its
> > > > > receipt.
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > _____________________________________________________________
> > > The information contained in this communication is intended solely for
> the
> > > use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others
> > > authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally
> privileged
> > > information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby
> notified
> > > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in
> reliance
> > > on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
> > > unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify
> > > us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your
> > > system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete
> transmission
> > > of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay
> in its
> > > receipt.
> > >
>
>
RE: Move to Java 7?
Posted by Srikanth Sundarrajan <sr...@hotmail.com>.
IMHO, As a bare minimum, we need to support LENS to run on Java8. Using java7 for compilation in the interim till we sort out issues with java 8 should be largely acceptable.
Regards
Srikanth Sundarrajan
> Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:26:41 +0530
> Subject: Re: Move to Java 7?
> From: amareshwari@gmail.com
> To: dev@lens.incubator.apache.org
>
> I propose, we support compiling with java7 for some more time. Few reasons
>
> 1. Most of the production setup is still with java7.
> 2. Lens build with java8 has some issues. We are not sure we uncovered
> all.
> 3. Many projects work with java7 and most of us have java7 in our
> machines.
>
> What do others think?
>
> Thanks
> Amareshwari
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Jaideep Dhok <ja...@inmobi.com>
> wrote:
>
> > That would be even better.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan <
> > sriksun@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jaideep,
> > > Java7 EOL is already announced, can we consider Java 8 instead ?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Srikanth Sundarrajan
> > >
> > > > Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:55:13 +0530
> > > > Subject: Move to Java 7?
> > > > From: jaideep.dhok@inmobi.com
> > > > To: dev@lens.incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > I was thinking we should move to Java 7 as the compiler version and
> > start
> > > > using niceties like try with resources. I think most devs are already
> > > > using Java 7 to build and develop but the version in POM is still 1.6.
> > > >
> > > > Java 7 is already officially supported by Hadoop 2.x
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jaideep
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > _____________________________________________________________
> > > > The information contained in this communication is intended solely for
> > > the
> > > > use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others
> > > > authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally
> > > privileged
> > > > information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby
> > > notified
> > > > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in
> > > reliance
> > > > on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
> > > > unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
> > notify
> > > > us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your
> > > > system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete
> > > transmission
> > > > of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in
> > > its
> > > > receipt.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > _____________________________________________________________
> > The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the
> > use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others
> > authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged
> > information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified
> > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance
> > on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
> > unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> > us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your
> > system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission
> > of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its
> > receipt.
> >