You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de> on 2017/12/30 18:14:34 UTC
Old Style Build Jobs
Hi,
based on the new Jenkinsfile based Builds I will delete step by step
older jobs for example:
https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-enforcer/
cause we have now as replacements..
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-enforcer/
Any objects about that?
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Old Style Build Jobs
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
On 9 February 2018 at 06:54, Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr> wrote:
> Le vendredi 9 février 2018, 02:16:10 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> > Thanks!
> > I will have a look for Wagon.
> thank you
>
> >
> > Do we deploy automatically SNAPSHOT or not?
> currently not: I'd like to do it, I think it's natural
> but Stephen, who masters the new Jenkins build configuration, is not
> positive
> on the idea
>
OMG it might be really complicated... :P
> and nobody really started a clean discussion on that
>
> > because of jdk10 issue for surefire, I currently have external projects
> > depending on those snapshot.
> to be concrete, currently, when I want to consume a SNAPSHOT after a
> release
> has been done, I have to do manually the "mvn deploy" from my computer
> and each time I did this, I can confirm that it was the first SNAPSHOT
> that was
> deployed (even if the release has been done a few weeks ago)
>
I'd like to have auto build of downstream projects as well...
changes of a shared lib should rebuild plugins depending on it etc...
>
> > IMHO might be good to have auto deploy so quick feedback from early
> > testers/adopters
> +1
>
> let's start the discussion: I'm convinced this is natural for a CI job to
> deploy SNAPSHOTs automatically to SNAPSHOT repository
> and after thinking at it seriously, I think the fear Stephen has is valid
> only
> on *triggering a build based on a new SNAPSHOT availability*, but not
> really
> on *deploying SNAPSHOTs as part of continuous build*
> the only question to me is how to code it precisely, to be sure the deploy
> happens only once (and not on each OS+JDK configuration), and as much as
> possible only if the build is fully successful (here, IIUC, the detection
> of
> "successful build" is currently not reliable)
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> >
> > On 8 February 2018 at 22:25, Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr>
> wrote:
> > > ok, I did the cleanup
> > >
> > > Tibor, I think there is cleanup to do on Surefire jobs: don't hesitate
> to
> > > do it
> > >
> > > I don't know for Wagon jobs
> > >
> > >
> > > The cleanup I didn't do is the cleanup on maven-master-release-*
> > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven%20Core%20ITs/
> > >
> > > I just disabled the jobs: if nobody objects, I'll delete the jobs and
> even
> > > the
> > > view in 1 week
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Hervé
> > >
> > > Le mercredi 24 janvier 2018, 07:41:32 CET Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> > > > Le mardi 23 janvier 2018, 20:57:42 CET Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
> > > > > >> 3.
> > > > > >> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-> >
> > > integration-test
> > >
> > > > > >> in
> > > > > >> g-m aven-3-embedded/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to keep this one, since it's a reference in embedded
> mode
> > > > > > (faster
> > > > > > execution)
> > > > >
> > > > > Our default Job for Maven Core [1] is running with embedded mode..
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]: https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven/
> > > >
> > > > ok, thanks for the info (I could have found myself...)
> > > >
> > > > then +1 to drop this job also
> > > >
> > > > and while at it
> > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-
> 3.x-jenkinsfile/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Hervé
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Re: Old Style Build Jobs
Posted by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr>.
Le vendredi 9 février 2018, 02:16:10 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> Thanks!
> I will have a look for Wagon.
thank you
>
> Do we deploy automatically SNAPSHOT or not?
currently not: I'd like to do it, I think it's natural
but Stephen, who masters the new Jenkins build configuration, is not positive
on the idea
and nobody really started a clean discussion on that
> because of jdk10 issue for surefire, I currently have external projects
> depending on those snapshot.
to be concrete, currently, when I want to consume a SNAPSHOT after a release
has been done, I have to do manually the "mvn deploy" from my computer
and each time I did this, I can confirm that it was the first SNAPSHOT that was
deployed (even if the release has been done a few weeks ago)
> IMHO might be good to have auto deploy so quick feedback from early
> testers/adopters
+1
let's start the discussion: I'm convinced this is natural for a CI job to
deploy SNAPSHOTs automatically to SNAPSHOT repository
and after thinking at it seriously, I think the fear Stephen has is valid only
on *triggering a build based on a new SNAPSHOT availability*, but not really
on *deploying SNAPSHOTs as part of continuous build*
the only question to me is how to code it precisely, to be sure the deploy
happens only once (and not on each OS+JDK configuration), and as much as
possible only if the build is fully successful (here, IIUC, the detection of
"successful build" is currently not reliable)
Regards,
Hervé
>
> On 8 February 2018 at 22:25, Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr> wrote:
> > ok, I did the cleanup
> >
> > Tibor, I think there is cleanup to do on Surefire jobs: don't hesitate to
> > do it
> >
> > I don't know for Wagon jobs
> >
> >
> > The cleanup I didn't do is the cleanup on maven-master-release-*
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven%20Core%20ITs/
> >
> > I just disabled the jobs: if nobody objects, I'll delete the jobs and even
> > the
> > view in 1 week
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hervé
> >
> > Le mercredi 24 janvier 2018, 07:41:32 CET Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> > > Le mardi 23 janvier 2018, 20:57:42 CET Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
> > > > >> 3.
> > > > >> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-> >
> > integration-test
> >
> > > > >> in
> > > > >> g-m aven-3-embedded/
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to keep this one, since it's a reference in embedded mode
> > > > > (faster
> > > > > execution)
> > > >
> > > > Our default Job for Maven Core [1] is running with embedded mode..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1]: https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven/
> > >
> > > ok, thanks for the info (I could have found myself...)
> > >
> > > then +1 to drop this job also
> > >
> > > and while at it
> > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.x-jenkinsfile/
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Hervé
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Old Style Build Jobs
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
Thanks!
I will have a look for Wagon.
Do we deploy automatically SNAPSHOT or not?
because of jdk10 issue for surefire, I currently have external projects
depending on those snapshot.
IMHO might be good to have auto deploy so quick feedback from early
testers/adopters
On 8 February 2018 at 22:25, Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr> wrote:
> ok, I did the cleanup
>
> Tibor, I think there is cleanup to do on Surefire jobs: don't hesitate to
> do it
>
> I don't know for Wagon jobs
>
>
> The cleanup I didn't do is the cleanup on maven-master-release-*
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven%20Core%20ITs/
>
> I just disabled the jobs: if nobody objects, I'll delete the jobs and even
> the
> view in 1 week
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mercredi 24 janvier 2018, 07:41:32 CET Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> > Le mardi 23 janvier 2018, 20:57:42 CET Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
> > > >> 3.
> > > >> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-
> integration-test
> > > >> in
> > > >> g-m aven-3-embedded/
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to keep this one, since it's a reference in embedded mode
> > > > (faster
> > > > execution)
> > >
> > > Our default Job for Maven Core [1] is running with embedded mode..
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]: https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven/
> >
> > ok, thanks for the info (I could have found myself...)
> >
> > then +1 to drop this job also
> >
> > and while at it
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.x-jenkinsfile/
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hervé
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Re: Old Style Build Jobs
Posted by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr>.
ok, I did the cleanup
Tibor, I think there is cleanup to do on Surefire jobs: don't hesitate to do it
I don't know for Wagon jobs
The cleanup I didn't do is the cleanup on maven-master-release-*
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven%20Core%20ITs/
I just disabled the jobs: if nobody objects, I'll delete the jobs and even the
view in 1 week
Regards,
Hervé
Le mercredi 24 janvier 2018, 07:41:32 CET Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> Le mardi 23 janvier 2018, 20:57:42 CET Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
> > >> 3.
> > >> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-test
> > >> in
> > >> g-m aven-3-embedded/
> > >
> > > I'd like to keep this one, since it's a reference in embedded mode
> > > (faster
> > > execution)
> >
> > Our default Job for Maven Core [1] is running with embedded mode..
> >
> >
> > [1]: https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven/
>
> ok, thanks for the info (I could have found myself...)
>
> then +1 to drop this job also
>
> and while at it
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.x-jenkinsfile/
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Old Style Build Jobs
Posted by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr>.
Le mardi 23 janvier 2018, 20:57:42 CET Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
> >> 3.
> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testin
> >> g-m aven-3-embedded/
> >
> > I'd like to keep this one, since it's a reference in embedded mode (faster
> > execution)
>
> Our default Job for Maven Core [1] is running with embedded mode..
>
>
> [1]: https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven/
>
ok, thanks for the info (I could have found myself...)
then +1 to drop this job also
and while at it
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.x-jenkinsfile/
Regards,
Hervé
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Old Style Build Jobs
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
Hi Hervé,
On 21/01/18 13:59, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Le samedi 20 janvier 2018, 23:23:04 CET Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
> great first removal: yes, let's work on next parts
>
>> so now the next parts:
>>
>> I would like to delete the following jobs on wednesday 24. january 2018
>> if no objections are coming up:
>>
>>
>> 1. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugin-testing/
>> 2.
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-resolver-ant-tasks/
> +1 on these 2
>
>> 3.
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-m
>> aven-3-embedded/
> I'd like to keep this one, since it's a reference in embedded mode (faster
> execution)
Our default Job for Maven Core [1] is running with embedded mode..
[1]: https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven/
>
>> 4.
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-it-maven-3-win/
> +1
>
>> 5. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/doxia-tools/
> -1 this one builds doxia-tools from svn (code not migrated to git)
>
>> 6. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/doxia-linkcheck/
> +1
>
>> 7. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/doxia-eclipse-editor/
> -1 like doxia-tools: code in svn
>
>> 8.
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-m
>> aven-3-embedded/
> +1
>
>> 9.
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-master-release-statu
>> s-test-plugins-windows/
>> 10.
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-master-release-statu
>> s-test-shared-windows/
> why not all the maven-master-release-status*? which test on components in git,
> then don't really test on latest code in git...
Yes removing them based on SVN usage..of course..
> For now, I'll remove the maven-master-release-status* from Maven view and only
> let them in Maven Core ITs (that will probably part of future cleanup...)
>
>> 11.
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-surefire/
>> 12.
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-surefire-windows/
> on these ones, I let Tibor decide if Maven-wip job is good enough to drop
> these manually crafted jobs (and if the answer is "no", we'll need to see
> why...)
>
>
> I propose to drop also
> 13. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-archetype-m3/
> 14. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-surefire-dev/
> (found while cleaning view)
> 15. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-shared_Jigsaw/
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>>
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Karl Heinz Marbaise
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Old Style Build Jobs
Posted by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr>.
Le samedi 20 janvier 2018, 23:23:04 CET Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
> Hi,
>
great first removal: yes, let's work on next parts
> so now the next parts:
>
> I would like to delete the following jobs on wednesday 24. january 2018
> if no objections are coming up:
>
>
> 1. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugin-testing/
> 2.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-resolver-ant-tasks/
+1 on these 2
> 3.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-m
> aven-3-embedded/
I'd like to keep this one, since it's a reference in embedded mode (faster
execution)
> 4.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-it-maven-3-win/
+1
> 5. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/doxia-tools/
-1 this one builds doxia-tools from svn (code not migrated to git)
> 6. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/doxia-linkcheck/
+1
> 7. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/doxia-eclipse-editor/
-1 like doxia-tools: code in svn
> 8.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-m
> aven-3-embedded/
+1
> 9.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-master-release-statu
> s-test-plugins-windows/
> 10.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-master-release-statu
> s-test-shared-windows/
why not all the maven-master-release-status*? which test on components in git,
then don't really test on latest code in git...
For now, I'll remove the maven-master-release-status* from Maven view and only
let them in Maven Core ITs (that will probably part of future cleanup...)
> 11.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-surefire/
> 12.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-surefire-windows/
on these ones, I let Tibor decide if Maven-wip job is good enough to drop
these manually crafted jobs (and if the answer is "no", we'll need to see
why...)
I propose to drop also
13. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-archetype-m3/
14. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-surefire-dev/
(found while cleaning view)
15. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-shared_Jigsaw/
Regards,
Hervé
>
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Old Style Build Jobs
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
Hi,
so now the next parts:
I would like to delete the following jobs on wednesday 24. january 2018
if no objections are coming up:
1. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugin-testing/
2.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-resolver-ant-tasks/
3.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-embedded/
4. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-it-maven-3-win/
5. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/doxia-tools/
6. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/doxia-linkcheck/
7. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/doxia-eclipse-editor/
8.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-embedded/
9.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-master-release-status-test-plugins-windows/
10.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-master-release-status-test-shared-windows/
11. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-surefire/
12.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-surefire-windows/
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Old Style Build Jobs
Posted by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr>.
Le vendredi 12 janvier 2018, 20:21:38 CET Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I think the following build jobs can be deleted as well:
>
> 1. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-2.2.x/
> 2. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.0.x/
> 3. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.x/
> 4. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-ant-tasks/
> 5. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-archetype-m2/
> 6.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-m
> aven-3/ 7.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-pipeline-test/ 8.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3/ 9.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3-windo
> ws/ 10.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.0.4/
> 11.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.0.5-w
> ith-maven-plugin/ 12.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.1.x-w
> ith-maven-plugin-jdk-1.8/ 13.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.1.x-w
> ith-maven-plugin-jdk-1.8_windows/ 14.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.2.1-w
> ith-maven-plugin-jdk-1.7/ 15.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-windows/
> 16. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-pipeline-test/
> 17. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-shared/ 18.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-shared-windows/ 19.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.2-release-status/
> 20.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.2-release-status-b
> uild/ 21.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.2-release-status-t
> est/ 22.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-m
> aven-3-solaris/ 23.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-m
> aven-3-osx/ 24.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-m
> aven-3-jdk-1.8/ 25.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-m
> aven-3-jdk-1.7/ 26.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-m
> aven-3-jdk-1.6-windows/ 27.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm-provider-svnjava
> / 28. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm/
> 29. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm-windows/
>
>
> I would delete the above jobs at Saturday 20. January of 2018...if no
> one has objections about it...
+1 from me
>
>
>
> A. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins/
> => I don't know why so many other projects are triggered by that Job?
> any idea about that?
this is the good old great Maven job that knows about SNAPSHOTs dependencies
then triggers even if code of plugin themselves did not change
This does not change anything about the conclusion: to be deleted since
plugins code evolves now in Git
> B. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-wagon-benchmarks/
> Is this needed? If yes ?
> C. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-wagon-jetty8/
> Any idea?
IIRC, these ones were Olivier Lamy's tentative Wagon improvements. But not
really worked on nowadays.
thanks for the cleanup: that's a complementary task to Git migration that I'm
happy not to lead :)
Regards,
Hervé
>
> D.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-wagon-jetty8-windows
> /
>
> Any feedback / information would be great..
>
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
> On 12/01/18 19:57, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > now I found another one which I have removed.
> >
> > The old build Job:
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-indexer-5.x/
> >
> > The new one:
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven-indexer/
> >
> > So I have deleted that job..
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Karl Heinz Marbaise
> >
> > On 30/12/17 19:34, Robert Scholte wrote:
> >> Yep, if you can confirm the jobs are covered by the TLP Jenkins
> >> script, then they can be removed.
> >> I don't think there's a reason to keep the historic statistics.
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Robert
> >>
> >> On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 19:14:34 +0100, Karl Heinz Marbaise
> >>
> >> <kh...@gmx.de> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> based on the new Jenkinsfile based Builds I will delete step by step
> >>> older jobs for example:
> >>>
> >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-enforcer/
> >>>
> >>> cause we have now as replacements..
> >>>
> >>> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-en
> >>> forcer/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Any objects about that?
> >>>
> >>> Kind regards
> >>> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Old Style Build Jobs
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
Hi,
so cleaned up Jenkins from the following list of Jobs..
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 12/01/18 20:21, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the following build jobs can be deleted as well:
>
> 1. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-2.2.x/
> 2. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.0.x/
> 3. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.x/
> 4. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-ant-tasks/
> 5. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-archetype-m2/
> 6.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3/
>
> 7. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-pipeline-test/
> 8. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3/
> 9.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3-windows/
>
> 10.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.0.4/
> 11.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.0.5-with-maven-plugin/
>
> 12.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.1.x-with-maven-plugin-jdk-1.8/
>
> 13.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.1.x-with-maven-plugin-jdk-1.8_windows/
>
> 14.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.2.1-with-maven-plugin-jdk-1.7/
>
> 15.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-windows/
> 16. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-pipeline-test/
> 17. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-shared/
> 18. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-shared-windows/
> 19.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.2-release-status/
> 20.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.2-release-status-build/
>
> 21.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.2-release-status-test/
>
> 22.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-solaris/
>
> 23.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-osx/
>
> 24.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.8/
>
> 25.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.7/
>
> 26.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.6-windows/
>
> 27.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm-provider-svnjava/
>
> 28. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm/
> 29. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm-windows/
>
>
> I would delete the above jobs at Saturday 20. January of 2018...if no
> one has objections about it...
>
>
>
> A. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins/
> => I don't know why so many other projects are triggered by that Job?
> any idea about that?
> B.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-wagon-benchmarks/
> Is this needed? If yes ?
> C. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-wagon-jetty8/
> Any idea?
>
> D.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-wagon-jetty8-windows/
>
>
> Any feedback / information would be great..
>
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
> On 12/01/18 19:57, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> now I found another one which I have removed.
>>
>> The old build Job:
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-indexer-5.x/
>>
>> The new one:
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven-indexer/
>>
>> So I have deleted that job..
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>>
>>
>> On 30/12/17 19:34, Robert Scholte wrote:
>>> Yep, if you can confirm the jobs are covered by the TLP Jenkins
>>> script, then they can be removed.
>>> I don't think there's a reason to keep the historic statistics.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Robert
>>>
>>> On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 19:14:34 +0100, Karl Heinz Marbaise
>>> <kh...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> based on the new Jenkinsfile based Builds I will delete step by step
>>>> older jobs for example:
>>>>
>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-enforcer/
>>>>
>>>> cause we have now as replacements..
>>>>
>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-enforcer/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any objects about that?
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards
>>>> Karl Heinz Marbaise
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Old Style Build Jobs
Posted by Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com>.
On Fri 12 Jan 2018 at 19:21, Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the following build jobs can be deleted as well:
>
> 1. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-2.2.x/
> 2. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.0.x/
> 3. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.x/
> 4. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-ant-tasks/
> 5. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-archetype-m2/
> 6.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3/
> 7. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-pipeline-test/
> 8. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3/
> 9.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3-windows/
> 10.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.0.4/
> 11.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.0.5-with-maven-plugin/
> 12.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.1.x-with-maven-plugin-jdk-1.8/
> 13.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.1.x-with-maven-plugin-jdk-1.8_windows/
> 14.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.2.1-with-maven-plugin-jdk-1.7/
> 15.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-windows/
> 16. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-pipeline-test/
> 17. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-shared/
> 18.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-shared-windows/
> 19.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.2-release-status/
> 20.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.2-release-status-build/
> 21.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.2-release-status-test/
> 22.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-solaris/
> 23.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-osx/
> 24.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.8/
> 25.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.7/
> 26.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.6-windows/
> 27.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm-provider-svnjava/
> 28. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm/
> 29. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm-windows/
>
>
> I would delete the above jobs at Saturday 20. January of 2018...if no
> one has objections about it...
>
+1 from me
>
>
> A. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins/
> => I don't know why so many other projects are triggered by that Job?
> any idea about that?
It’s *evil* job type so will pick up SNAPSHOT triggering.
> B.
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-wagon-benchmarks/
> Is this needed? If yes ?
I think if we want something like this we should set up a job for this by
using a specific branch with a custom Jenkinsfile (or a separate repo)
I’d say hold off on this until we figure out what it’s doing.
> C. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-wagon-jetty8/
> Any idea?
No clue!
>
> D.
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-wagon-jetty8-windows/
>
> Any feedback / information would be great..
>
Well the new jobs are on a matrix of OSes so “in theory” we shouldn’t need
a Windows specific job any more... but given we do t know about C above...
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
> On 12/01/18 19:57, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > now I found another one which I have removed.
> >
> > The old build Job:
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-indexer-5.x/
> >
> > The new one:
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven-indexer/
> >
> > So I have deleted that job..
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Karl Heinz Marbaise
> >
> >
> > On 30/12/17 19:34, Robert Scholte wrote:
> >> Yep, if you can confirm the jobs are covered by the TLP Jenkins
> >> script, then they can be removed.
> >> I don't think there's a reason to keep the historic statistics.
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Robert
> >>
> >> On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 19:14:34 +0100, Karl Heinz Marbaise
> >> <kh...@gmx.de> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> based on the new Jenkinsfile based Builds I will delete step by step
> >>> older jobs for example:
> >>>
> >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-enforcer/
> >>>
> >>> cause we have now as replacements..
> >>>
> >>>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-enforcer/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Any objects about that?
> >>>
> >>> Kind regards
> >>> Karl Heinz Marbaise
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
> --
Sent from my phone
Re: Old Style Build Jobs
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
Hi,
I think the following build jobs can be deleted as well:
1. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-2.2.x/
2. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.0.x/
3. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.x/
4. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-ant-tasks/
5. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-archetype-m2/
6.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3/
7. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-pipeline-test/
8. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3/
9.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3-windows/
10.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.0.4/
11.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.0.5-with-maven-plugin/
12.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.1.x-with-maven-plugin-jdk-1.8/
13.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.1.x-with-maven-plugin-jdk-1.8_windows/
14.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.2.1-with-maven-plugin-jdk-1.7/
15. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-windows/
16. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-pipeline-test/
17. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-shared/
18. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-shared-windows/
19.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.2-release-status/
20.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.2-release-status-build/
21.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.2-release-status-test/
22.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-solaris/
23.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-osx/
24.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.8/
25.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.7/
26.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.6-windows/
27.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm-provider-svnjava/
28. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm/
29. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm-windows/
I would delete the above jobs at Saturday 20. January of 2018...if no
one has objections about it...
A. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins/
=> I don't know why so many other projects are triggered by that Job?
any idea about that?
B. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-wagon-benchmarks/
Is this needed? If yes ?
C. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-wagon-jetty8/
Any idea?
D.
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-wagon-jetty8-windows/
Any feedback / information would be great..
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 12/01/18 19:57, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> now I found another one which I have removed.
>
> The old build Job:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-indexer-5.x/
>
> The new one:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven-indexer/
>
> So I have deleted that job..
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
>
> On 30/12/17 19:34, Robert Scholte wrote:
>> Yep, if you can confirm the jobs are covered by the TLP Jenkins
>> script, then they can be removed.
>> I don't think there's a reason to keep the historic statistics.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Robert
>>
>> On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 19:14:34 +0100, Karl Heinz Marbaise
>> <kh...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> based on the new Jenkinsfile based Builds I will delete step by step
>>> older jobs for example:
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-enforcer/
>>>
>>> cause we have now as replacements..
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-enforcer/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Any objects about that?
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Old Style Build Jobs
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
Hi,
now I found another one which I have removed.
The old build Job:
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-indexer-5.x/
The new one:
https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven-indexer/
So I have deleted that job..
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 30/12/17 19:34, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Yep, if you can confirm the jobs are covered by the TLP Jenkins script,
> then they can be removed.
> I don't think there's a reason to keep the historic statistics.
>
> +1
>
> Robert
>
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 19:14:34 +0100, Karl Heinz Marbaise
> <kh...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> based on the new Jenkinsfile based Builds I will delete step by step
>> older jobs for example:
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-enforcer/
>>
>> cause we have now as replacements..
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-enforcer/
>>
>>
>>
>> Any objects about that?
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Karl Heinz Marbaise
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Old Style Build Jobs
Posted by Robert Scholte <rf...@apache.org>.
Yep, if you can confirm the jobs are covered by the TLP Jenkins script,
then they can be removed.
I don't think there's a reason to keep the historic statistics.
+1
Robert
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 19:14:34 +0100, Karl Heinz Marbaise
<kh...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> based on the new Jenkinsfile based Builds I will delete step by step
> older jobs for example:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-enforcer/
>
> cause we have now as replacements..
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-enforcer/
>
>
> Any objects about that?
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org