You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@serf.apache.org by Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl> on 2016/08/29 09:59:50 UTC

[Vote] Apache Serf 1.3.9 up for signing/testing

The 1.3.9 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.

Please get the tarballs from
  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/serf
and add your signatures there.  I plan to try and release on September 1st
so please try and get your votes/signatures in place by August 31th.

I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache Serf 1.3.9 GA.

[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.

Thanks,
	Bert


RE: [Vote] Apache Serf 1.3.9 up for signing/testing

Posted by Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl>.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bert Huijben [mailto:bert@qqmail.nl]
> Sent: maandag 29 augustus 2016 12:00
> To: dev@serf.apache.org
> Subject: [Vote] Apache Serf 1.3.9 up for signing/testing
> 
> The 1.3.9 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> 
> Please get the tarballs from
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/serf
> and add your signatures there.  I plan to try and release on September 1st
> so please try and get your votes/signatures in place by August 31th.
> 
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache Serf 1.3.9 GA.
> 
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.

[x] +1: Good to go

Just for the mail archive :-)

	Bert



Re: [Vote] Apache Serf 1.3.9 up for signing/testing

Posted by Ivan Zhakov <iv...@visualsvn.com>.
On 31 August 2016 at 15:29, Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com [mailto:justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com] On
>> Behalf Of Justin Erenkrantz
>> Sent: woensdag 31 augustus 2016 14:04
>> To: Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl>
>> Cc: dev@serf.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [Vote] Apache Serf 1.3.9 up for signing/testing
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl> wrote:
>> > If you still want to add your signature, please commit them to
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/serf
>>
>> I don't know what the process for doing that is any more.  Any
>> pointers?  -- justin
>
>         Hi Justin,
>
> This is the first time we did this for serf, so I just used the method we used for Subversion for several years.
> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#tarball-signing
>
> The usual procedure is a checkout of https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/serf, which gets you the artifacts and .asc files
>
> I scripted the signing for myself by calling
> $ gpg -ba -o - "$file" >> "$file.asc"
> '-b' is for a detached signature
> '-a' is for an ascii signature
> '-o -' sends the output to stdout, which allows the forwarding with >>
>
> Committing the .asc files back stores them in the staging area... but I just copied them from there to the release area ^/release/serf. But PMC members can just add the keys to the .asc files there.
>
>
> We currently have 3 signatures, so we have everything we need for
> our first proper ASF release tomorrow, but of course it will be useful
> if more developers know how to provide the signatures.
>
Hi Bert,

I noticed that other ASF projects publish .asc files only with one
signature. See httpd-2.2.31.tar.gz.asc for example [1]. Also GPG
checks only first signature and I'm getting warning like below if .asc
file has multiple signatures:
[[
gpg: WARNING: multiple signatures detected.  Only the first will be checked.
]]

[1] https://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.2.31.tar.gz.asc


-- 
Ivan Zhakov

RE: [Vote] Apache Serf 1.3.9 up for signing/testing

Posted by Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl>.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com [mailto:justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Justin Erenkrantz
> Sent: woensdag 31 augustus 2016 14:04
> To: Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl>
> Cc: dev@serf.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Vote] Apache Serf 1.3.9 up for signing/testing
> 
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl> wrote:
> > If you still want to add your signature, please commit them to
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/serf
> 
> I don't know what the process for doing that is any more.  Any
> pointers?  -- justin

	Hi Justin,

This is the first time we did this for serf, so I just used the method we used for Subversion for several years.
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#tarball-signing

The usual procedure is a checkout of https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/serf, which gets you the artifacts and .asc files

I scripted the signing for myself by calling
$ gpg -ba -o - "$file" >> "$file.asc"
'-b' is for a detached signature
'-a' is for an ascii signature
'-o -' sends the output to stdout, which allows the forwarding with >>

Committing the .asc files back stores them in the staging area... but I just copied them from there to the release area ^/release/serf. But PMC members can just add the keys to the .asc files there.


We currently have 3 signatures, so we have everything we need for our first proper ASF release tomorrow, but of course it will be useful if more developers know how to provide the signatures.

	Bert


Re: [Vote] Apache Serf 1.3.9 up for signing/testing

Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl> wrote:
> If you still want to add your signature, please commit them to
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/serf

I don't know what the process for doing that is any more.  Any
pointers?  -- justin

RE: [Vote] Apache Serf 1.3.9 up for signing/testing

Posted by Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl>.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bert Huijben [mailto:bert@qqmail.nl]
> Sent: maandag 29 augustus 2016 12:00
> To: dev@serf.apache.org
> Subject: [Vote] Apache Serf 1.3.9 up for signing/testing
> 
> The 1.3.9 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> 
> Please get the tarballs from
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/serf
> and add your signatures there.  I plan to try and release on September 1st
> so please try and get your votes/signatures in place by August 31th.
> 
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache Serf 1.3.9 GA.
> 
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.

With 3 +1's, and no +0 nor -1 votes and a bit of additional input from
others I'm going forward with preparing a release tomorrow.

If you still want to add your signature, please commit them to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/serf

	Bert


Re: [Vote] Apache Serf 1.3.9 up for signing/testing

Posted by Ivan Zhakov <iv...@visualsvn.com>.
On 29 August 2016 at 12:59, Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl> wrote:
> The 1.3.9 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
>
> Please get the tarballs from
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/serf
> and add your signatures there.  I plan to try and release on September 1st
> so please try and get your votes/signatures in place by August 31th.
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache Serf 1.3.9 GA.
>
I'm +1 to release Apache Serf 1.3.9.

-- 
Ivan Zhakov

Re: [Vote] Apache Serf 1.3.9 up for signing/testing

Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl> wrote:
> The 1.3.9 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
>
> Please get the tarballs from
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/serf
> and add your signatures there.  I plan to try and release on September 1st
> so please try and get your votes/signatures in place by August 31th.
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache Serf 1.3.9 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.

+1 - tested with Ubuntu 14.04/x86_64.

Cheers.  -- justin

Re: [Vote] Apache Serf 1.3.9 up for signing/testing

Posted by Andreas Stieger <an...@gmx.de>.
On 29/08/16 11:59, Bert Huijben wrote:
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache Serf 1.3.9 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.

[x] +1: Good to go

Andreas