.svn directories considered harmful :-).

["Thomas A. Horsley" <to...@att.net>]

As a potential new user reading about subversion for the first time, I was
immediately struck by what an incredibly bad idea the .svn directories seem
to be. Wouldn't they be safer if I could do something like set an
environment variable named (perhaps) SNV_ROOT and then have the .svn
directories created under the SVN_ROOT directory tree instead of directly in
my working copy?

My work area is where I live all the time, where I fat finger commands,
where I run perl scripts to automatically edit all the files in the
directory tree, etc. With the .svn directories mixed in with my work area, I
have to constantly be on guard. With them off in a separate parallel
directory tree, I'm much less likely to do something stupid to them. Having
the .svn directories in my work area seems a lot like logging in as root all
the time :-).

Just 2 cents from the first impressions of someone who knows nothing about
subversion except what he read in the book the last couple of days.

--
>>==>> The *Best* political site <URL:http://www.vote-smart.org/> >>==+
      email: Tom.Horsley@worldnet.att.net icbm: Delray Beach, FL      |
<URL:http://home.att.net/~Tom.Horsley> Free Software and Politics <<==+


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org