Re: svn commit: r820918 [2/2] - in /incubator/aries/trunk: ./ jndi/ jndi/jndi-bundle/ jndi/jndi-bundle/src/ jndi/jndi-bundle/src/main/ jndi/jndi-bundle/src/main/java/ jndi/jndi-bundle/src/main/java/org/ jndi/jndi-bundle/src/main/java/org/apache/ jndi

["Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>]

I agree.

On Oct 6, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:

> I've updated the IBM contributed files so the (C) notice has been
> removed. I've added the Apache header to the top of .java files. It's
> in r822341.
>
> I noticed that the svn history was lost moving the JNDI code over to
> trunk. It would be nice to try to keep that (IMHO). I appreciate it
> means checking out the whole of aries/* instead of aries/trunk but at
> the moment that's not much overhead.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeremy
>
> 2009/10/3 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>:
>>
>> On Oct 2, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 2, 2009, at 8:56 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
>>>> If someone from IBM wants to remove them that's ok but it's not a
>>>> requirement.   Why do you think that's a requirement?  Just  
>>>> curious.
>>>
>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers
>>
>> Nothing escapes your eagle eye...
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>

Re: svn commit: r820918 [2/2] - in /incubator/aries/trunk: ./ jndi/ jndi/jndi-bundle/ jndi/jndi-bundle/src/ jndi/jndi-bundle/src/main/ jndi/jndi-bundle/src/main/java/ jndi/jndi-bundle/src/main/java/org/ jndi/jndi-bundle/src/main/java/org/apache/ jndi

[Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>]

Me too.
--kevan
On Oct 6, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:

> I agree.
>
> On Oct 6, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>
>> I've updated the IBM contributed files so the (C) notice has been
>> removed. I've added the Apache header to the top of .java files. It's
>> in r822341.
>>
>> I noticed that the svn history was lost moving the JNDI code over to
>> trunk. It would be nice to try to keep that (IMHO). I appreciate it
>> means checking out the whole of aries/* instead of aries/trunk but at
>> the moment that's not much overhead.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jeremy
>>
>> 2009/10/3 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>:
>>>
>>> On Oct 2, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 2, 2009, at 8:56 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If someone from IBM wants to remove them that's ok but it's not a
>>>>> requirement.   Why do you think that's a requirement?  Just  
>>>>> curious.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers
>>>
>>> Nothing escapes your eagle eye...
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>>
>