You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/07/26 15:27:57 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35838] -
Java NIO patch against Lucene 1.9
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35838>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35838
rengels@tylertechinc.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Java NIO patch against |Java NIO patch against
|Lucene 1.9 |Lucene 1.9
------- Additional Comments From rengels@tylertechinc.com 2005-07-26 15:27 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
I've attached an improved NioFile and caching mechanism. One of the problems
with the earlier implementation was that the cache size could grow enemorous
(since it was a certain percentage of all outstanding segements).
The attached cache is shared by all segments and has an upper bound.
As a note, your performance improvement numbers do not jive with what I have
seen. How many simultaneous threads are you using? What was the cache size?
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org