You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> on 2010/02/16 20:25:57 UTC
Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Hey,
I have been asked to release CouchDB 0.11.
In accordance with our documented release procedure, I am making a formal request for comments. The most important part of this process is that each developer checks the README, NEWS, and CHANGES files, updating them as necessary.
If you have any other comments, or objections, please also raise them now.
Thanks,
N
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
Awesome,
Coolness. My updates are in.
Paul
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> CHANGES are for developers, NEWS is for users. The rest is your call.
>
> On 16 Feb 2010, at 20:05, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> Awesome,
>>
>> Yay release party! Is there a rule of thumb for what goes in CHANGES
>> and what goes in NEWS? I'm going over the bullet points and trying to
>> figure out where to put a couple different things that are missing.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> I have been asked to release CouchDB 0.11.
>>>
>>> In accordance with our documented release procedure, I am making a formal request for comments. The most important part of this process is that each developer checks the README, NEWS, and CHANGES files, updating them as necessary.
>>>
>>> If you have any other comments, or objections, please also raise them now.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> N
>
>
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>.
CHANGES are for developers, NEWS is for users. The rest is your call.
On 16 Feb 2010, at 20:05, Paul Davis wrote:
> Awesome,
>
> Yay release party! Is there a rule of thumb for what goes in CHANGES
> and what goes in NEWS? I'm going over the bullet points and trying to
> figure out where to put a couple different things that are missing.
>
> Paul
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I have been asked to release CouchDB 0.11.
>>
>> In accordance with our documented release procedure, I am making a formal request for comments. The most important part of this process is that each developer checks the README, NEWS, and CHANGES files, updating them as necessary.
>>
>> If you have any other comments, or objections, please also raise them now.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> N
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
Awesome,
Yay release party! Is there a rule of thumb for what goes in CHANGES
and what goes in NEWS? I'm going over the bullet points and trying to
figure out where to put a couple different things that are missing.
Paul
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have been asked to release CouchDB 0.11.
>
> In accordance with our documented release procedure, I am making a formal request for comments. The most important part of this process is that each developer checks the README, NEWS, and CHANGES files, updating them as necessary.
>
> If you have any other comments, or objections, please also raise them now.
>
> Thanks,
>
> N
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 20 Feb 2010, at 10:38, Noah Slater wrote:
> Can the other committers please acknowledge that they have checked these files for changesets they are responsible for?
Ack.
Cheers
Jan
--
>
> Fixing these files is a significant source of friction for me when preparing the release, as any error spotted means a complete rebuild and test of the whole package.
>
> Thanks,
>
> On 19 Feb 2010, at 15:18, J Chris Anderson wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 19, 2010, at 5:33 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
>>
>>> hi guys,
>>>
>>> Both NEWS and CHANGES seem to be missing the replication by doc ids (ticket
>>> COUCHDB-631).
>>> Shouldn't it be mentioned there?
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for pointing that out. I've updated the files and backported.
>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 18 Feb 2010, at 13:34, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been asked to release CouchDB 0.11.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In accordance with our documented release procedure, I am making a
>>>> formal request for comments. The most important part of this process is that
>>>> each developer checks the README, NEWS, and CHANGES files, updating them as
>>>> necessary.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have any other comments, or objections, please also raise them
>>>> now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> N
>>>>>
>>>>> Commited my changes too and updated the site to add me to the
>>>>> committers. How is the site updated ? Anything to do or is it
>>>>> automatic ?
>>>>
>>>>> ssh people.apache.org "svn up /www/couchdb.apache.org"
>>>> ...
>>>> U /www/couchdb.apache.org/community/lists.html
>>>> U /www/couchdb.apache.org/community/committers.txt
>>>> U /www/couchdb.apache.org/community/committers.html
>>>> Updated to revision 911650.
>>>>
>>>> And then it takes about an hour to get updated and synched to all the
>>>> mirrors.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Jan
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Filipe David Manana,
>>> fdmanana@gmail.com
>>> PGP key - http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC569452B
>>>
>>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>>> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>>> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>>
>
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Adam Kocoloski <ko...@apache.org>.
On Feb 27, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:22 AM, J Chris Anderson <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2010, at 7:00 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
>>
>>> I would still like to see ticket 639 in 0.11.
>>>
>>
>> I'm reading 639 and it seems like a great patch. But it's a little bit big
>> and I can't tell for certain that there isn't something subtle I'm not
>> seeing. I think the best course of action would be to apply it just after
>> the 0.11 release, so it gets some field testing before it goes out in a
>> release.
>>
>> It's not a new feature so it is still a candidate for 0.11.1 / 1.0. I'd
>> just feel better about introducing a large patch to the code base if it has
>> time to get used in a few different settings before being baked into a
>> release.
>>
>
> True, it's a little bit big.
> In that case I don't mind having it in a 0.11.1 release.
>
> cheers
Sorry, I didn't get around to reviewing 639 till today, but it's in trunk now. Cheers,
Adam
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Filipe David Manana <fd...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:22 AM, J Chris Anderson <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 26, 2010, at 7:00 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
>
> > I would still like to see ticket 639 in 0.11.
> >
>
> I'm reading 639 and it seems like a great patch. But it's a little bit big
> and I can't tell for certain that there isn't something subtle I'm not
> seeing. I think the best course of action would be to apply it just after
> the 0.11 release, so it gets some field testing before it goes out in a
> release.
>
> It's not a new feature so it is still a candidate for 0.11.1 / 1.0. I'd
> just feel better about introducing a large patch to the code base if it has
> time to get used in a few different settings before being baked into a
> release.
>
True, it's a little bit big.
In that case I don't mind having it in a 0.11.1 release.
cheers
>
> Chris
>
> > Adam told me, via IRC, he will review the patch by the end of this week.
> >
> > I vote +1 on it.
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Nope, you can send payment to any email.
> >>
> >> As long as the recipient can click on the link in the email, they can
> >> deposit it into any account.
> >>
> >> On 26 Feb 2010, at 14:37, till wrote:
> >>
> >>> I always knew secretly open source worked like that. ;)
> >>>
> >>> Btw, I know it's not so subtle, but you need to include your paypal
> >> email... :D
> >>>
> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui86peQZ74s
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>> For the list's benefit, Randall sent me $2 via PayPal, suggesting I
> buy
> >> a candy bar.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks Randall, I may unofficially call this the Randall release.
> Kinda
> >> got a ring to it, that.
> >>>>
> >>>> If anyone else wants to sponsor the release, you know what to do.
> >>>>
> >>>> On 25 Feb 2010, at 20:25, Noah Slater wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Send $1 to nslater@tumbolia.org and I will cut it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 25 Feb 2010, at 20:13, Randall Leeds wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>> Cut it!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Feb 25, 2010 12:08 PM, "Paul Davis" <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So really all of the patches brought up in the last few hours are
> >> good
> >>>>>> candidates for 1.0.
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Filipe David Manana,
> > fdmanana@gmail.com
> > PGP key - http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC569452B
> >
> > "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
> > Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
> > That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>
>
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com
PGP key - http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC569452B
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by J Chris Anderson <jc...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 26, 2010, at 7:00 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> I would still like to see ticket 639 in 0.11.
>
I'm reading 639 and it seems like a great patch. But it's a little bit big and I can't tell for certain that there isn't something subtle I'm not seeing. I think the best course of action would be to apply it just after the 0.11 release, so it gets some field testing before it goes out in a release.
It's not a new feature so it is still a candidate for 0.11.1 / 1.0. I'd just feel better about introducing a large patch to the code base if it has time to get used in a few different settings before being baked into a release.
Chris
> Adam told me, via IRC, he will review the patch by the end of this week.
>
> I vote +1 on it.
>
> cheers
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>
>> Nope, you can send payment to any email.
>>
>> As long as the recipient can click on the link in the email, they can
>> deposit it into any account.
>>
>> On 26 Feb 2010, at 14:37, till wrote:
>>
>>> I always knew secretly open source worked like that. ;)
>>>
>>> Btw, I know it's not so subtle, but you need to include your paypal
>> email... :D
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui86peQZ74s
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>
>> wrote:
>>>> For the list's benefit, Randall sent me $2 via PayPal, suggesting I buy
>> a candy bar.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Randall, I may unofficially call this the Randall release. Kinda
>> got a ring to it, that.
>>>>
>>>> If anyone else wants to sponsor the release, you know what to do.
>>>>
>>>> On 25 Feb 2010, at 20:25, Noah Slater wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Send $1 to nslater@tumbolia.org and I will cut it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 25 Feb 2010, at 20:13, Randall Leeds wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> Cut it!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 25, 2010 12:08 PM, "Paul Davis" <pa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So really all of the patches brought up in the last few hours are
>> good
>>>>>> candidates for 1.0.
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Filipe David Manana,
> fdmanana@gmail.com
> PGP key - http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC569452B
>
> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Filipe David Manana <fd...@gmail.com>.
I would still like to see ticket 639 in 0.11.
Adam told me, via IRC, he will review the patch by the end of this week.
I vote +1 on it.
cheers
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> Nope, you can send payment to any email.
>
> As long as the recipient can click on the link in the email, they can
> deposit it into any account.
>
> On 26 Feb 2010, at 14:37, till wrote:
>
> > I always knew secretly open source worked like that. ;)
> >
> > Btw, I know it's not so subtle, but you need to include your paypal
> email... :D
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui86peQZ74s
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>
> wrote:
> >> For the list's benefit, Randall sent me $2 via PayPal, suggesting I buy
> a candy bar.
> >>
> >> Thanks Randall, I may unofficially call this the Randall release. Kinda
> got a ring to it, that.
> >>
> >> If anyone else wants to sponsor the release, you know what to do.
> >>
> >> On 25 Feb 2010, at 20:25, Noah Slater wrote:
> >>
> >>> Send $1 to nslater@tumbolia.org and I will cut it.
> >>>
> >>> On 25 Feb 2010, at 20:13, Randall Leeds wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>> Cut it!
> >>>>
> >>>> On Feb 25, 2010 12:08 PM, "Paul Davis" <pa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> So really all of the patches brought up in the last few hours are
> good
> >>>> candidates for 1.0.
> >>>> +1
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com
PGP key - http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC569452B
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>.
Nope, you can send payment to any email.
As long as the recipient can click on the link in the email, they can deposit it into any account.
On 26 Feb 2010, at 14:37, till wrote:
> I always knew secretly open source worked like that. ;)
>
> Btw, I know it's not so subtle, but you need to include your paypal email... :D
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui86peQZ74s
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>> For the list's benefit, Randall sent me $2 via PayPal, suggesting I buy a candy bar.
>>
>> Thanks Randall, I may unofficially call this the Randall release. Kinda got a ring to it, that.
>>
>> If anyone else wants to sponsor the release, you know what to do.
>>
>> On 25 Feb 2010, at 20:25, Noah Slater wrote:
>>
>>> Send $1 to nslater@tumbolia.org and I will cut it.
>>>
>>> On 25 Feb 2010, at 20:13, Randall Leeds wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>> Cut it!
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 25, 2010 12:08 PM, "Paul Davis" <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So really all of the patches brought up in the last few hours are good
>>>> candidates for 1.0.
>>>> +1
>>>
>>
>>
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by till <kl...@gmail.com>.
I always knew secretly open source worked like that. ;)
Btw, I know it's not so subtle, but you need to include your paypal email... :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui86peQZ74s
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> For the list's benefit, Randall sent me $2 via PayPal, suggesting I buy a candy bar.
>
> Thanks Randall, I may unofficially call this the Randall release. Kinda got a ring to it, that.
>
> If anyone else wants to sponsor the release, you know what to do.
>
> On 25 Feb 2010, at 20:25, Noah Slater wrote:
>
>> Send $1 to nslater@tumbolia.org and I will cut it.
>>
>> On 25 Feb 2010, at 20:13, Randall Leeds wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> Cut it!
>>>
>>> On Feb 25, 2010 12:08 PM, "Paul Davis" <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So really all of the patches brought up in the last few hours are good
>>> candidates for 1.0.
>>> +1
>>
>
>
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>.
For the list's benefit, Randall sent me $2 via PayPal, suggesting I buy a candy bar.
Thanks Randall, I may unofficially call this the Randall release. Kinda got a ring to it, that.
If anyone else wants to sponsor the release, you know what to do.
On 25 Feb 2010, at 20:25, Noah Slater wrote:
> Send $1 to nslater@tumbolia.org and I will cut it.
>
> On 25 Feb 2010, at 20:13, Randall Leeds wrote:
>
>> +1
>> Cut it!
>>
>> On Feb 25, 2010 12:08 PM, "Paul Davis" <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So really all of the patches brought up in the last few hours are good
>> candidates for 1.0.
>> +1
>
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>.
Send $1 to nslater@tumbolia.org and I will cut it.
On 25 Feb 2010, at 20:13, Randall Leeds wrote:
> +1
> Cut it!
>
> On Feb 25, 2010 12:08 PM, "Paul Davis" <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So really all of the patches brought up in the last few hours are good
> candidates for 1.0.
> +1
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>.
+1
Cut it!
On Feb 25, 2010 12:08 PM, "Paul Davis" <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So really all of the patches brought up in the last few hours are good
candidates for 1.0.
+1
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
> So really all of the patches brought up in the last few hours are good candidates for 1.0.
+1
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com>.
597 is a bug fix, so, yes, don't hold 0.11 up for it. I think it's a
slam dunk for 1.0, though.
B.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 25 Feb 2010, at 04:43, Robert Newson wrote:
>
>> I second this emotion. :)
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> See my last comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-597
>>>
>>> I would <3 <3 <3 to see this make it.
>
>
> There's a ton of patches I'd like to see in CouchDB, but we'll never release anything
> if don't make a cut somewhere. 0.11 has been in the making for 9 months now and
> really needs to get out there so we can find and fix all the bugs that users find so
> 1.0 becomes a grand release.
>
> If you are concerned that "yourfavouritepatch" doesn't make it into 1.0: After 0.11
> is released we'll only fix bugs in that branch and eventually cut 1.0 from it. If you
> think a new feature should be in 1.0 that is not in 0.11, call for a vote for that
> patch. Be prepared that it should be simple enough and should have tests and
> not break anything. If "yourfavouritepatch" is a bugfix, there's no need for a vote
> for a commit.
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
>
>
>
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by J Chris Anderson <jc...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 25, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On 25 Feb 2010, at 04:43, Robert Newson wrote:
>
>> I second this emotion. :)
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> See my last comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-597
>>>
>>> I would <3 <3 <3 to see this make it.
>
>
> There's a ton of patches I'd like to see in CouchDB, but we'll never release anything
> if don't make a cut somewhere. 0.11 has been in the making for 9 months now and
> really needs to get out there so we can find and fix all the bugs that users find so
> 1.0 becomes a grand release.
>
> If you are concerned that "yourfavouritepatch" doesn't make it into 1.0: After 0.11
> is released we'll only fix bugs in that branch and eventually cut 1.0 from it. If you
> think a new feature should be in 1.0 that is not in 0.11, call for a vote for that
> patch. Be prepared that it should be simple enough and should have tests and
> not break anything. If "yourfavouritepatch" is a bugfix, there's no need for a vote
> for a commit.
>
Agreed.
I'd further say that I consider the replicator to be the one place I'm happy to see enhancements introduced between 0.11 and 1.0. The replicator is decoupled from the rest of CouchDB, so changes here aren't likely to introduce instabilities.
I'd also be fine to see enhancements to Futon made between 0.11 and 1.0. Again, nothing here is likely to negatively impact active CouchDB users, or otherwise cause instabilities.
So really all of the patches brought up in the last few hours are good candidates for 1.0.
Chris
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
>
>
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 25 Feb 2010, at 04:43, Robert Newson wrote:
> I second this emotion. :)
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> See my last comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-597
>>
>> I would <3 <3 <3 to see this make it.
There's a ton of patches I'd like to see in CouchDB, but we'll never release anything
if don't make a cut somewhere. 0.11 has been in the making for 9 months now and
really needs to get out there so we can find and fix all the bugs that users find so
1.0 becomes a grand release.
If you are concerned that "yourfavouritepatch" doesn't make it into 1.0: After 0.11
is released we'll only fix bugs in that branch and eventually cut 1.0 from it. If you
think a new feature should be in 1.0 that is not in 0.11, call for a vote for that
patch. Be prepared that it should be simple enough and should have tests and
not break anything. If "yourfavouritepatch" is a bugfix, there's no need for a vote
for a commit.
Cheers
Jan
--
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com>.
I second this emotion. :)
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> See my last comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-597
>
> I would <3 <3 <3 to see this make it.
>
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Matt Goodall <ma...@gmail.com>.
On 25 February 2010 11:35, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>
> And I just this morning noticed a request from Matt Goodall about 0.11 Futon storage.
The Futon Storage issue, COUCHDB-668, is fixed in master/trunk.
The one I'm really concerned about now is COUCHDB-671 [1], "Futon
changes data when starting to edit", and, to a lesser degree,
COUCHDB-667 [2], "Futon implicit typing when adding/editing fields is
flawed", although the two issues are quite closely related.
- Matt
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-671
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-667
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Filipe David Manana <fd...@gmail.com>.
If not asking too much,
I would also like to see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-639in 0.11.
It's a follow up to the attachment compression feature and also fixes the
problem with push replication when docs have large attachments (ticket 163
related also).
cheers
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> And I just this morning noticed a request from Matt Goodall about 0.11
> Futon storage.
>
> On 25 Feb 2010, at 10:06, Randall Leeds wrote:
>
> > See my last comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-597
> >
> > I would <3 <3 <3 to see this make it.
>
>
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com
PGP key - http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC569452B
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>.
And I just this morning noticed a request from Matt Goodall about 0.11 Futon storage.
On 25 Feb 2010, at 10:06, Randall Leeds wrote:
> See my last comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-597
>
> I would <3 <3 <3 to see this make it.
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>.
See my last comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-597
I would <3 <3 <3 to see this make it.
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by J Chris Anderson <jc...@couch.io>.
On Feb 22, 2010, at 7:31 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 22 Feb 2010, at 03:38, J Chris Anderson wrote:
>
>> I've checked and added json2.js to the NEWS and CHANGES in trunk and 0.11
>>
>> Also it's nice to think about breaking changes as well when you are thinking of this. I've got a bunch of stuff written up and headed wikiward for 0.11, but for future reference, we should think of the breaking changes page as being in the same boat as news and changes.
>
> Agreed.
>
> I have added this as a new checkpoint for the release procedure.
I'm ready for 0.11 to happen. It's been long enough for comments, etc.
I know we've been finding and fixing bugs, but hopefully we've done the majority of that. The point of the feature freeze is to let us focus on finding and fixing bugs for 1.0, so we shouldn't let the possibility of a few stragglers hold us back.
So let's do this thing!
Chris
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>.
On 22 Feb 2010, at 03:38, J Chris Anderson wrote:
> I've checked and added json2.js to the NEWS and CHANGES in trunk and 0.11
>
> Also it's nice to think about breaking changes as well when you are thinking of this. I've got a bunch of stuff written up and headed wikiward for 0.11, but for future reference, we should think of the breaking changes page as being in the same boat as news and changes.
Agreed.
I have added this as a new checkpoint for the release procedure.
Thanks Chris.
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by J Chris Anderson <jc...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 21, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Jason Davies wrote:
> Hey Noah,
>
> On 20 Feb 2010, at 18:38, Noah Slater wrote:
>
>> Can the other committers please acknowledge that they have checked these files for changesets they are responsible for?
>
>
> I've checked and have nothing to add.
I've checked and added json2.js to the NEWS and CHANGES in trunk and 0.11
Also it's nice to think about breaking changes as well when you are thinking of this. I've got a bunch of stuff written up and headed wikiward for 0.11, but for future reference, we should think of the breaking changes page as being in the same boat as news and changes.
Chris
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Jason Davies <ja...@jasondavies.com>.
Hey Noah,
On 20 Feb 2010, at 18:38, Noah Slater wrote:
> Can the other committers please acknowledge that they have checked these files for changesets they are responsible for?
I've checked and have nothing to add.
Cheers,
--
Jason Davies
www.jasondavies.com
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
On Saturday, February 20, 2010, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> Can the other committers please acknowledge that they have checked these files for changesets they are responsible for?
>
> Fixing these files is a significant source of friction for me when preparing the release, as any error spotted means a complete rebuild and test of the whole package.
>
> Thanks,
ok for myself. benoit
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Mark Hammond <sk...@gmail.com>.
On 21/02/2010 5:38 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Can the other committers please acknowledge that they have checked
> these files for changesets they are responsible for?
I've nothing to add.
Cheers,
Mark
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org>.
Can the other committers please acknowledge that they have checked these files for changesets they are responsible for?
Fixing these files is a significant source of friction for me when preparing the release, as any error spotted means a complete rebuild and test of the whole package.
Thanks,
On 19 Feb 2010, at 15:18, J Chris Anderson wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 2010, at 5:33 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
>
>> hi guys,
>>
>> Both NEWS and CHANGES seem to be missing the replication by doc ids (ticket
>> COUCHDB-631).
>> Shouldn't it be mentioned there?
>>
>
> Thanks for pointing that out. I've updated the files and backported.
>
>> cheers
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 18 Feb 2010, at 13:34, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been asked to release CouchDB 0.11.
>>>>>
>>>>> In accordance with our documented release procedure, I am making a
>>> formal request for comments. The most important part of this process is that
>>> each developer checks the README, NEWS, and CHANGES files, updating them as
>>> necessary.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have any other comments, or objections, please also raise them
>>> now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> N
>>>>
>>>> Commited my changes too and updated the site to add me to the
>>>> committers. How is the site updated ? Anything to do or is it
>>>> automatic ?
>>>
>>>> ssh people.apache.org "svn up /www/couchdb.apache.org"
>>> ...
>>> U /www/couchdb.apache.org/community/lists.html
>>> U /www/couchdb.apache.org/community/committers.txt
>>> U /www/couchdb.apache.org/community/committers.html
>>> Updated to revision 911650.
>>>
>>> And then it takes about an hour to get updated and synched to all the
>>> mirrors.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Jan
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Filipe David Manana,
>> fdmanana@gmail.com
>> PGP key - http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC569452B
>>
>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by J Chris Anderson <jc...@couch.io>.
On Feb 19, 2010, at 5:33 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> hi guys,
>
> Both NEWS and CHANGES seem to be missing the replication by doc ids (ticket
> COUCHDB-631).
> Shouldn't it be mentioned there?
>
Thanks for pointing that out. I've updated the files and backported.
> cheers
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 18 Feb 2010, at 13:34, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to release CouchDB 0.11.
>>>>
>>>> In accordance with our documented release procedure, I am making a
>> formal request for comments. The most important part of this process is that
>> each developer checks the README, NEWS, and CHANGES files, updating them as
>> necessary.
>>>>
>>>> If you have any other comments, or objections, please also raise them
>> now.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> N
>>>
>>> Commited my changes too and updated the site to add me to the
>>> committers. How is the site updated ? Anything to do or is it
>>> automatic ?
>>
>>> ssh people.apache.org "svn up /www/couchdb.apache.org"
>> ...
>> U /www/couchdb.apache.org/community/lists.html
>> U /www/couchdb.apache.org/community/committers.txt
>> U /www/couchdb.apache.org/community/committers.html
>> Updated to revision 911650.
>>
>> And then it takes about an hour to get updated and synched to all the
>> mirrors.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jan
>> --
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Filipe David Manana,
> fdmanana@gmail.com
> PGP key - http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC569452B
>
> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Filipe David Manana <fd...@gmail.com>.
hi guys,
Both NEWS and CHANGES seem to be missing the replication by doc ids (ticket
COUCHDB-631).
Shouldn't it be mentioned there?
cheers
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 18 Feb 2010, at 13:34, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> I have been asked to release CouchDB 0.11.
> >>
> >> In accordance with our documented release procedure, I am making a
> formal request for comments. The most important part of this process is that
> each developer checks the README, NEWS, and CHANGES files, updating them as
> necessary.
> >>
> >> If you have any other comments, or objections, please also raise them
> now.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> N
> >
> > Commited my changes too and updated the site to add me to the
> > committers. How is the site updated ? Anything to do or is it
> > automatic ?
>
> > ssh people.apache.org "svn up /www/couchdb.apache.org"
> ...
> U /www/couchdb.apache.org/community/lists.html
> U /www/couchdb.apache.org/community/committers.txt
> U /www/couchdb.apache.org/community/committers.html
> Updated to revision 911650.
>
> And then it takes about an hour to get updated and synched to all the
> mirrors.
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
>
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com
PGP key - http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC569452B
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 18 Feb 2010, at 13:34, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I have been asked to release CouchDB 0.11.
>>
>> In accordance with our documented release procedure, I am making a formal request for comments. The most important part of this process is that each developer checks the README, NEWS, and CHANGES files, updating them as necessary.
>>
>> If you have any other comments, or objections, please also raise them now.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> N
>
> Commited my changes too and updated the site to add me to the
> committers. How is the site updated ? Anything to do or is it
> automatic ?
> ssh people.apache.org "svn up /www/couchdb.apache.org"
...
U /www/couchdb.apache.org/community/lists.html
U /www/couchdb.apache.org/community/committers.txt
U /www/couchdb.apache.org/community/committers.html
Updated to revision 911650.
And then it takes about an hour to get updated and synched to all the
mirrors.
Cheers
Jan
--
Re: Releasing 0.11, Request for Comments
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have been asked to release CouchDB 0.11.
>
> In accordance with our documented release procedure, I am making a formal request for comments. The most important part of this process is that each developer checks the README, NEWS, and CHANGES files, updating them as necessary.
>
> If you have any other comments, or objections, please also raise them now.
>
> Thanks,
>
> N
Commited my changes too and updated the site to add me to the
committers. How is the site updated ? Anything to do or is it
automatic ?
- benoît