You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Daniel Quinlan <qu...@pathname.com> on 2004/12/01 05:49:36 UTC
Re: svn commit: r109274 - /spamassassin/trunk/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/AutoWhitelist.pm /spamassassin/trunk/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm /spamassassin/trunk/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/EvalTests.pm
duncf@apache.org writes:
> bug 1670: Added some new tags for AWL status
Do we still need this? It's been requested once in 2 years.
Also, it's not bug 1670.... which bug is it?
> + _AWLCOUNT_ Number of messages on which AWL modicfication is based
typo
--
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
Re: svn commit: r109274 - /spamassassin/trunk/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/AutoWhitelist.pm /spamassassin/trunk/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm /spamassassin/trunk/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/EvalTests.pm
Posted by Duncan Findlay <du...@debian.org>.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:49:36PM -0800, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> duncf@apache.org writes:
>
> > bug 1670: Added some new tags for AWL status
>
> Do we still need this? It's been requested once in 2 years.
It's trivial. I think the more available tags, the better, but we do
need to organize the man page better as it gets more cluttered...
> Also, it's not bug 1670.... which bug is it?
1683, sorry.
> > + _AWLCOUNT_ Number of messages on which AWL modicfication is based
>
> typo
Fixed.
--
Duncan Findlay