You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Claus Ibsen (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/01/11 05:50:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (CAMEL-17446) Trigger start time for Quartz causes confusion with short trigger intervals
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-17446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Claus Ibsen updated CAMEL-17446:
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.15.0
> Trigger start time for Quartz causes confusion with short trigger intervals
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-17446
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-17446
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: camel-quartz
> Affects Versions: 3.13.0
> Reporter: Karen Lease
> Assignee: Karen Lease
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.15.0
>
>
> An issue reported on the users list shows that using trigger.repeatInterval=1200 causes the first 2 events to be fired sooner than expected after the scheduler is started.
> This is due to the delay between creating the Quartz Trigger and when the scheduler is started.
> Changing the log message to show the milliseconds in the trigger's next fire time would be helpful. In addition, it appears counter-intuitive that triggerStartDelay is ignored if positive, as shown in QuartzEndpoint.createTrigger() below:
> {code:java}
> if (getComponent().getScheduler().isStarted() || triggerStartDelay < 0) {
> triggerBuilder.startAt(new Date(System.currentTimeMillis() + triggerStartDelay));
> }{code}
> Is this intentional?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)