Re: patch for Search, POST-Script, etc...

[Randy Terbush <ra...@zyzzyva.com>]

> On Sun, 7 Apr 1996 sameer@c2.org wrote:
> 
> > I think the directive names could be a bit better done.
> >
> > I know it's a nit, but I think it's an important nit.
> 
> I'm kinda torn on this. One one side, I agree that the names are a bit
> lacking, asthetically, but on the other hand, they are the names that
> the CERN httpd uses (used?), so it makes some sense to use the same
> names...
> 
> > Script GET /cgi...
> > Script PUT /cgi...
> > Script POST /cgi...
> > Script DELETE
> >
> > 	(The second mirrors the DocumentError style of directive)
> 
> Hmm. I actually kind of like this. Hmm. Anyone else have an opinion?

I vote for asthetically pleasing. Documenting the CERN translation
would suffice.