You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Subhobrata Dey (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/01/28 01:41:40 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-2985) Allow different field names for unionAll() in Table API

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15120520#comment-15120520 ] 

Subhobrata Dey commented on FLINK-2985:
---------------------------------------

Hello,

I want to work on this issue. Can somebody kindly assign me this issue?

Thanks & regards,
Subhobrata

> Allow different field names for unionAll() in Table API
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-2985
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2985
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Table API
>            Reporter: Timo Walther
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The recently merged `unionAll` operator checks if the field names of the left and right side are equal. Actually, this is not necessary. The union operator in SQL checks only the types and uses the names of left side.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)