[Bug 6566] X-Ham-Report default wording ("has identified this incoming email as possible spam") is confusing and inaccurate

[bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org]

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6566

--- Comment #2 from Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si> 2011-05-05 01:01:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 4871
  --> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4871
Allow _YESNO_ to take arguments, replacing the"Yes"/"No" defaults

The attached patch extends macros _YESNO_ and _YESNOCAPS_ to take
optional arguments, replacing the default substitutions "Yes" and "No"
with user-supplied strings if specified. Parsing of arguments is
simple-minded, a comma may not appear within the first argument.

Updated docs now say:

=head1 TEMPLATE TAGS
[...]
 _YESNO_           "Yes" for spam, "No" for nonspam (=ham)
 _YESNO(spam_str,ham_str)_  returns the first argument ("Yes" if missing)
                   for spam, and the second argument ("No" if missing) for ham
 _YESNOCAPS_       "YES" for spam, "NO" for nonspam (=ham)
 _YESNOCAPS(spam_str,ham_str)_  same as _YESNO(...)_, but uppercased


The attached patch also modifies the default report template
to take advantage of the above.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.