You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@maven.apache.org by "Weston, Toby" <to...@Misys.com> on 2005/11/23 09:57:48 UTC
[M2] M2 Status?
Hi Folks,
Silly question probably but the Maven site talks about using M1 for critical
projects (http://maven.apache.org/maven1.html#m1-or-m2) as opposed to M2,
specifically it mentions M2 is a beta release? Is that still the case as the
download area seems to infer its non-beta/stable? Basically, what's the
status of Mega-Maven-2?
Cheers,
Toby
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [M2] M2 Status?
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com>.
site fixed.
On 11/24/05, Jason van Zyl <ja...@maven.org> wrote:
> Weston, Toby wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > Silly question probably but the Maven site talks about using M1 for critical
> > projects (http://maven.apache.org/maven1.html#m1-or-m2) as opposed to M2,
> > specifically it mentions M2 is a beta release? Is that still the case as the
> > download area seems to infer its non-beta/stable? Basically, what's the
> > status of Mega-Maven-2?
>
> Maven 2.0 has been release. We're still working on Mega-Maven :-)
>
> > Cheers,
> > Toby
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> jvz.
>
> Jason van Zyl
> jason at maven.org
> http://maven.apache.org
>
> People develop abstractions by generalizing from concrete examples.
> Every attempt to determine the correct abstraction on paper without
> actually developing a running system is doomed to failure. No one
> is that smart. A framework is a resuable design, so you develop it by
> looking at the things it is supposed to be a design of. The more examples
> you look at, the more general your framework will be.
>
> -- Ralph Johnson & Don Roberts, Patterns for Evolving Frameworks
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [M2] M2 Status?
Posted by Jason van Zyl <ja...@maven.org>.
Weston, Toby wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Silly question probably but the Maven site talks about using M1 for critical
> projects (http://maven.apache.org/maven1.html#m1-or-m2) as opposed to M2,
> specifically it mentions M2 is a beta release? Is that still the case as the
> download area seems to infer its non-beta/stable? Basically, what's the
> status of Mega-Maven-2?
Maven 2.0 has been release. We're still working on Mega-Maven :-)
> Cheers,
> Toby
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
>
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jason at maven.org
http://maven.apache.org
People develop abstractions by generalizing from concrete examples.
Every attempt to determine the correct abstraction on paper without
actually developing a running system is doomed to failure. No one
is that smart. A framework is a resuable design, so you develop it by
looking at the things it is supposed to be a design of. The more examples
you look at, the more general your framework will be.
-- Ralph Johnson & Don Roberts, Patterns for Evolving Frameworks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org