Re: AW: Struts vs. JADE (from IBM) - feature and usability comparison - n...

[SL...@aol.com]

Not to mention that they built the new Administration Console in struts... go 
figure...

Re: AW: Struts vs. JADE (from IBM) - feature and usability comparison - n...

[Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>]

I'm not familare with it either. I've collected references to MVC
frameworks here 

http://husted.com/about/struts/links.htm#mvc

but Jade hasn't come up. 

-- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
-- Custom Software ~ Technical Services.
-- Tel +1 716 737-3463
-- http://www.husted.com/about/struts/

> I've tried to find any information on Jade but haven't managed to do
> so. However, it may well be that Jade is based on an older version of
> Struts, modified to work with WebSphere 3.0x and onwards.

Re: AW: Struts vs. JADE (from IBM) - feature and usability comparison - n...

[Robert Claeson <r....@computer.org>]

SLBrand@aol.com wrote:

> Not to mention that they built the new Administration Console in 
> struts... go
> figure...

I figure IBM is a large company. Just because the guy who built the 
web-based admin tools for WebSphere 4 single-server edition (the "real" 
WAS 4 has a different admin interface) decided to use Struts for that 
task, it doesn't mean that IBM has "endorsed" Struts for all their work. 
  I've tried to find any information on Jade but haven't managed to do 
so. However, it may well be that Jade is based on an older version of 
Struts, modified to work with WebSphere 3.0x and onwards.

-- 
"I invented the term object-oriented, and I
  can tell you I didn't have C++ in mind."

                         -- Alan Kay