Re: [Templates] Re: Excellent article on Apache/mod_perl at eToys

[Drew Taylor <dr...@drewtaylor.com>]

What I found most interesting was the detail of the extensive caching which 
was implemented to survive the seasonal rush. I look forward to working on 
a project one day that is big enough to warrant such a system. All in all, 
a most excellent and informative read.

Thanks again for everything you've personally done for the community! I 
look forward to seeing those graphics. :-)

At 09:49 AM 10/19/01 -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>Thanks to all for the kind words.  This article actually went up a little
>bit before it was supposed to, and there should be a revision going up soon
>with some grammatical fixes and a set of graphics to illustrate parts of it.
>I'll post a follow-up when that happens in case anyone wants to go and look
>at the pretty pictures.
>
>While we're on the subject, thanks to everyone who contributed to the many
>open source projects that we used.  We couldn't have done it without you.

Drew Taylor                     JA[P|m_p|SQL]H
http://www.drewtaylor.com/      Just Another Perl|mod_perl|SQL Hacker
mailto:drew@drewtaylor.com      *** God bless America! ***
ICQ: 135298242

Re: [OT] Re: Excellent article on Apache/mod_perl at eToys

[Perrin Harkins <pe...@elem.com>]

> Wasn't this "seasonal rush" at least partly caused by the so-called toywar
> (www.toywar.com) between eToys.com (the online retailer) and etoy.com
> (the art group)?

There were a lot of DoS attacks (and some even uglier, nastier ones) in 1999
as a result of that.  Most of that was dealt with through standard access
control stuff, plus the throttling code that was mentioned in the article.

The 2000 rush, which we built this new system for, was real customer
traffic, although there's always some joker with a bot trying to buy all the
PlayStation 2 units.

- Perrin

[OT] Re: Excellent article on Apache/mod_perl at eToys

[Thomas Klausner <do...@zsi.at>]

Hi!

On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 09:59:18AM -0400, Drew Taylor wrote:
> What I found most interesting was the detail of the extensive caching which 
> was implemented to survive the seasonal rush.
Wasn't this "seasonal rush" at least partly caused by the so-called toywar
(www.toywar.com) between eToys.com (the online retailer) and etoy.com
(the art group)?

As far as I remember this incident, eToys.com sued etoy.com (who were
holding this domain since 1994) because of trademark delusion etc., which
caused one of the first distrubuted DOS attacks against etoys.com.

see:
http://rtmark.com/etoymain.html


-- 
D_OMM
O_xyderkes
M_echanen    http://domm.zsi.at
M_asteuei