You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@netbeans.apache.org by Jaroslav Tulach <ja...@gmail.com> on 2019/02/18 19:04:53 UTC
Re: Release Apache NetBeans parent pom 1.0
Dne pondělí 18. února 2019 16:55:52 CET, Ate Douma napsal(a):
> This *new* maven artifact is using Maven groupId: org.netbeans.maven.
> Which IMO can and should at least use the org.apache.netbeans prefix.
> There is no existing usage, yet, so *not* using the org.apache. prefix
> as expected seems weird and wrong to me.
As a strong proponent of compatibility, I am ready to defend existing co-
ordinates for existing artifacts.
However in this case I agree with Ate. Let's use org.apache.netbeans:parent:1
My voice isn't a vote. I just want to support Ate's argumentation in this
case: When in ASF behave like Apache!
-jt
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Release Apache NetBeans parent pom 1.0
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 19/02/2019 02.23, hanasaki@gmail.com wrote:
> Maybe consider A="netbeans-parent" In the absence of OSGI, "parent" is
> common and ambiguous across multiple projects. Example: I have been on
> projects that ended up with transitive dependencies of multiple
> "utility.jar" from different groups. While less likely with a parent,
> IMHO still a collision risk and [projectName]-parent does give context
> in debugging.
The Maven artifactId netbeans-parent is fine so this is not an
issue. Furthermore, this being a pom artifact which only is used by
Maven during a build, there is no ambiguity nor transitive dependency
problem.
>
> On 2/18/19 2:04 PM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
>> Dne pondělí 18. února 2019 16:55:52 CET, Ate Douma napsal(a):
>>> This *new* maven artifact is using Maven groupId: org.netbeans.maven.
>>> Which IMO can and should at least use the org.apache.netbeans prefix.
>>> There is no existing usage, yet, so *not* using the org.apache. prefix
>>> as expected seems weird and wrong to me.
>>
>> As a strong proponent of compatibility, I am ready to defend existing co-
>> ordinates for existing artifacts.
>>
>> However in this case I agree with Ate. Let's use
>> org.apache.netbeans:parent:1
>>
>> My voice isn't a vote. I just want to support Ate's argumentation in this
>> case: When in ASF behave like Apache!
>> -jt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>>
>> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Release Apache NetBeans parent pom 1.0
Posted by "hanasaki@gmail.com" <ha...@gmail.com>.
Maybe consider A="netbeans-parent" In the absence of OSGI, "parent" is
common and ambiguous across multiple projects. Example: I have been on
projects that ended up with transitive dependencies of multiple
"utility.jar" from different groups. While less likely with a parent,
IMHO still a collision risk and [projectName]-parent does give context
in debugging.
On 2/18/19 2:04 PM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
> Dne pondělí 18. února 2019 16:55:52 CET, Ate Douma napsal(a):
>> This *new* maven artifact is using Maven groupId: org.netbeans.maven.
>> Which IMO can and should at least use the org.apache.netbeans prefix.
>> There is no existing usage, yet, so *not* using the org.apache. prefix
>> as expected seems weird and wrong to me.
>
> As a strong proponent of compatibility, I am ready to defend existing co-
> ordinates for existing artifacts.
>
> However in this case I agree with Ate. Let's use org.apache.netbeans:parent:1
>
> My voice isn't a vote. I just want to support Ate's argumentation in this
> case: When in ASF behave like Apache!
> -jt
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>