You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Eric Gillespie <ep...@pretzelnet.org> on 2008/03/22 04:13:20 UTC

Re: FW: Differences in neon add_directory w/ copy vs. local add_directory w/ copy

Karl Fogel <kf...@red-bean.com> writes:

> > Is the "1" for "overwrite" the issue?  I also noticed that Svn 1.5
> > doesn't do things quite the same way.  Unfortunately, I was unable to
> > locate an issue report about this to determine whether it fixes this
> > problem or not.
> 
> Can you reproduce this difference in behavior with trunk code or with
> the recently-released beta of Subversion 1.5?  If you can, I think we
> have a bug...

Hm, this report is odd in light of
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2939

-- 
Eric Gillespie <*> epg@pretzelnet.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: FW: Differences in neon add_directory w/ copy vs. local add_directory w/ copy

Posted by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net>.
Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 9:31 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net> wrote:
>> Eric Gillespie wrote:
>>  > Karl Fogel <kf...@red-bean.com> writes:
>>  >
>>  >>> Is the "1" for "overwrite" the issue?  I also noticed that Svn 1.5
>>  >>> doesn't do things quite the same way.  Unfortunately, I was unable to
>>  >>> locate an issue report about this to determine whether it fixes this
>>  >>> problem or not.
>>  >> Can you reproduce this difference in behavior with trunk code or with
>>  >> the recently-released beta of Subversion 1.5?  If you can, I think we
>>  >> have a bug...
>>  >
>>  > Hm, this report is odd in light of
>>  > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2939
>>
>>  I wonder if this is related at all to
>>  http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1962#desc8 ?
> 
> Probably, but the working copy shouldn't send the foo.txt file as an add either!
> 
> (There might be 2 bugs there.)

Yeah.  As I indicated in that issue, there were so many options for where to 
start placing blame, I had to punt.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand


Re: FW: Differences in neon add_directory w/ copy vs. local add_directory w/ copy

Posted by Erik Huelsmann <eh...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 9:31 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net> wrote:
> Eric Gillespie wrote:
>  > Karl Fogel <kf...@red-bean.com> writes:
>  >
>  >>> Is the "1" for "overwrite" the issue?  I also noticed that Svn 1.5
>  >>> doesn't do things quite the same way.  Unfortunately, I was unable to
>  >>> locate an issue report about this to determine whether it fixes this
>  >>> problem or not.
>  >> Can you reproduce this difference in behavior with trunk code or with
>  >> the recently-released beta of Subversion 1.5?  If you can, I think we
>  >> have a bug...
>  >
>  > Hm, this report is odd in light of
>  > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2939
>
>  I wonder if this is related at all to
>  http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1962#desc8 ?

Probably, but the working copy shouldn't send the foo.txt file as an add either!

(There might be 2 bugs there.)

bye,

Erik.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: FW: Differences in neon add_directory w/ copy vs. local add_directory w/ copy

Posted by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net>.
Eric Gillespie wrote:
> Karl Fogel <kf...@red-bean.com> writes:
> 
>>> Is the "1" for "overwrite" the issue?  I also noticed that Svn 1.5
>>> doesn't do things quite the same way.  Unfortunately, I was unable to
>>> locate an issue report about this to determine whether it fixes this
>>> problem or not.
>> Can you reproduce this difference in behavior with trunk code or with
>> the recently-released beta of Subversion 1.5?  If you can, I think we
>> have a bug...
> 
> Hm, this report is odd in light of
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2939

I wonder if this is related at all to
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1962#desc8 ?

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand