Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Future of Log4j 1.x

[Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>]

These show up as two distinct threads In Mail on my MacBook Pro. 

FWIW, the PMC is aware of at least two distributions that already seem to fulfill the need of providing patched versions of Log4 1:

1. https://github.com/albfernandez/log4j/
2. https://search.maven.org/artifact/io.confluent/confluent-log4j (The source appears to be in a private repository).

Of course, both of these use different maven coordinates than Apache Log4j so users will have to ensure they exclude the Apache Log4j dependencies.

Ralph





> On Dec 30, 2021, at 5:23 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Christian>vote in this thread, which is, btw not meant for discussion but
> for voting.
> 
> We are on a [DISCUSS] thread (check the subject).
> 
> Ralph "created" [DISCUSS] thread by hitting "reply" and changing the
> subject.
> "reply" keeps message-id, so it might look like a single thread.
> 
> See both "[DISCUSS][VOTE] Future of Log4j 1.x" and "[VOTE] Future of Log4j
> 1.x"
> at https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@logging.apache.org
> 
> Vladimir