You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@ozone.apache.org by "Ivan Andika (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2024/03/16 04:00:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (HDDS-10532) Multiple OMs integration tests

Ivan Andika created HDDS-10532:
----------------------------------

             Summary: Multiple OMs integration tests
                 Key: HDDS-10532
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-10532
             Project: Apache Ozone
          Issue Type: Improvement
            Reporter: Ivan Andika
            Assignee: Ivan Andika


This comes from the discussion of multiple OMs support (sharing the same SCM + DN set): [https://github.com/apache/ozone/discussions/4803]

Our internal cluster has been using multiple OMs setup for quite a while and no issues are currently found.

However, I think it would be good to extend MiniOzoneCluster to allow multiple OMs and write some smoke tests to validate that there are no conflicts between similar operations in both OMs.

This also opens a way to test future multi-OM related features, such as:
 * Unified Ozone Filesystem
 * Multi-OM support for S3G

 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@ozone.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@ozone.apache.org