[jira] [Closed] (AMQ-6271) activemq-osgi defines wrong range for org.springframework.osgi...

["Timothy Bish (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Timothy Bish closed AMQ-6271.
-----------------------------
    Resolution: Duplicate

> activemq-osgi defines wrong range for org.springframework.osgi...
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-6271
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6271
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: OSGi/Karaf
>    Affects Versions: 5.14.0, 5.13.3
>            Reporter: Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>             Fix For: 5.14.0, 5.13.4
>
>
> The generated bundle manifest in activemq-osgi bundle defines wrong range for Spring OSGi packages:
> {noformat}
> org.springframework.osgi.context.support;resolution:=optional;version="[3,5)"
> {noformat}
> where the pom defines following 
> {noformat}
> org.springframework.osgi*;version="[1,4]";resolution:=optional
> {noformat}
> I think, the {{maven-bundle-plugin}} generates wrong version when the subpackages are defined in pom after the super-package, like this
> {noformat}
> org.springframework*;version="[3,5)";resolution:=optional,
> org.springframework.jms*;version="[3,5)";resolution:=optional,
> org.springframework.osgi*;version="[1,4]";resolution:=optional,
> org.springframework.transaction*;version="[3,5)";resolution:=optional,
> {noformat}
> In this case {{org.springframework.osgi*}} packages will have generated the {{[3,5)}} version because the super package {{org.springframework*}} is defined first. Bug in {{maven-bundle-plugin}} or a feature?
> Btw. why do we need the range {{\[1,4\]}} for {{org.springframework.osgi*}}? It was introduced by https://github.com/apache/activemq/commit/3a6d67e8f95320bea91b7c7106173c9b34773bc5#diff-d5b8d20ad29a25abf3fbd33c79dafc9e (AMQ-4727). Previously was {{\[1.2,1.3\]}} (eventually {{[1.2, 2)}} ) and it should be ok, because we have (and will have) no newer version of Spring DM



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)